[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Robert Englund in 2001 Maniacs (2005)

User reviews

2001 Maniacs

128 reviews
4/10

There's always room for one more ... MANIAC!

The almighty Hershell Gordon-Lewis already promised us through a very catchy song that the South was going to rise again... and it did! Slightly more than forty years after the Godfather of Gore's terrific splatter-classic, energetic director Tim Sullivan gathered quite an impressive cast and updated Lewis' screenplay with new gory sickness and nowadays sleaze 'n swearing! I'm usually not this enthusiastic when it comes to remakes of classic horror films, but "2001 Maniacs" simply is a fun & unpretentious little movie that clearly intended to please horror fans first, rather than to hit big at the box office. The original story is preserved, as a whole bunch of young party animals on their way to the Southern beaches are detoured the peculiar little town of Pleasant Valley where they're given a warm reception as honoree guests to a local jubilee. The townsfolk, with one-eyed mayor Buckman in charge, all soon turn out to be deranged killers that are still very rancorous about the Southern Civil War casualties and, one by one, the Yankee tourists are butchered in very imaginative ways. Some of the killings are strangely similar to the ones in Lewis' original, some of them are completely new...but they ALL are utterly grotesque and exhilaratingly gross! Whenever there isn't any gore on display, we're treated to absurd dialogues, morbid jokes and – oh yeah – loads of naked flesh supplied by the most ravishing babes of nowadays horror flicks. Of course, purely talking cinema, this isn't much of good film because it totally lacks tension and it's tasteless, offensive and completely ridiculous. Personally I couldn't care less about this because A) you pretty much know what to expect here and B) it's a splendid throwback to the rancid 60's and 70's; the times when horror cinema didn't necessarily had to justify its exploitative tendencies. Robert Englund clearly hasn't had this much fun portraying a mad character than since the original "Nightmare on Elm Street" and Lin Shaye once again proves she's a sadly underrated but great actress that delivers no matter how silly her lines are. The younger cast members perform adequately and Sullivan's directing is fairly surefooted as well. Although the additional maniac in the title never really gets introduced, I suppose it relates to the little silent girl who dissects rats for fun. "2001 Maniacs" is one of the most entertaining horror films of the past couple of years and I recommend it highly!
  • Coventry
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • Permalink
6/10

Groovy.

2001 maniacs is essentially a grind house movie if you look at it. The story is the third most important part of the film, after gore and sex. That being said, i do not really mind that since i am a fan of gore myself.

The plot in the movie is not anything new, a bunch of teenagers gets into trouble with the supernatural. You have seen that several times if your a fan of horror. What makes this movie better than average is the fact that it's self avare of it. It doesn't try to be the shining or something like that, instead we get pure grind house fun. The camera is even outdated for the time, a pretty classic grind house team (since they were made on a shoestring budget).

Robert Englund is great as the main villain (As always), the main cast of teens are bad and the acting overall from them is stale and uninspiring. What makes this movie fun to watch is the interaction of the teens (Bad acting) with the townspeople (mostly good acting). The plot moves along with a decent speed so you are never bored with it, and the climax is pretty good.

Another thing that really make it feel like a grind house aside from the gore and the sex are the fact that it is not scared of taking the low road. It's rare to have such strong language in horror movies that are mainstream produced as this one has. "Boy, Negro, Chinaman (Sorry, Chinawoman) and such. Its a movie that doesn't care at all and is just out to entertain you.

Is it better than 2000 maniacs? No, it is. not Is it a bad movie? Yes it is, but it's also a pretty decent one. Once again, that is if you see this movie as a grind house movie, which it really isn't, but there are strong influence by the grind house cinema in it. The best part of this movie is the kills, that isn't anything strange since that's true 90% of the time when there is a body count. But there is also a pretty fun dark humor in this film that doesn't go unnoticed.
  • bewnhurr
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • Permalink
4/10

Tries to fit the tried and true horror mold but falls flat on it's face

  • Robert_duder
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • Permalink
4/10

Very disappointing

  • boondocksaint20
  • May 7, 2006
  • Permalink
7/10

This Is What The Monkees Meant By A "Pleasant Valley Sunday"...NOT!

Let this be a warning to you right off the bat, dear reader and horror fan: if you have the kind of 'political correctness' meter that sounds the alarm at fart jokes, you will want to stay VERY FAR AWAY from the likes of 2001 MANIACS. If you're a hardier horror buff who likes your flicks to follow the "Triple-B" Rule, (Babes, Boobs and Blood), then YEEEE-HAAAW, Bubba! Y'all jest struck GOLD! There's more swingin' jugs and spurtin' jugulars here than you'd find everywhere else, plus the 'bestest 'finger-lickin' good' barbecue this side of a Texas Chainsaw Family Reunion!

If you know your horror history, you know that 2001 MANIACS is the lovingly-rendered redo of the gore-tastic Herschell Gordon Lewis' signature grue-fest 2000 MANIACS, here given the full-tilt millennium 'makeover.'

The good-humored ghouls of Pleasant Valley, GA. (population: well - look at the title, genius!) are 'DIED-in-the-wool' Southerners who don't take too kindly to stray Yankees who trespass on their turf. It probably doesn't help that over 200 years ago, every inhabitant was slaughtered by Sherman's army as he and his men raped, razed and rip- snorted their way through to HOTLanta. So their vengeful, zombiefied ghosts return each year for a little payback. A fake detour sign misdirects unwitting travelers to Pleasant Valley, where every day is the celebration of the "Guts And Glory Jubilee", and the lost tourists are always the 'guests of honor' at the Jubilee barbecue...where they also do double-duty as THE MAIN COURSE!!! But in-between those two plot points, seduction and slaughter of every imaginable kind abounds.

This time, eight friends who are classmates from the same college are on their way to Daytona Beach for Spring Break...and all the babes, booze and beer they can handle! Thanks to a wayward short cut that gets them lost, and that rigged "detour" sign that points them right into the heart of Pleasant Valley, there's one element they can add to that list - BLOOD - as in their own!!!

Once the kids hit town, it would take a moron not to figure out that there is something unpleasantly weird about these grinning, welcoming, backwoods "hell-billys" (led by a gleefully demented Robert "Freddy Krueger" Englund.) But then for college students, none of these guys (or girls) are particularly the brightest light-bulbs in the pack.

What they are, are the soon-to-be 'entrées'...er, I mean 'guests of honor' welcomed to the Valley by the overly friendly Mayor Buckman (Englund), who are at first as charmed as they are freaked at this little backwater burg, where they seem to take dedication to the whole "Civil-War era reenactment" thing a little too seriously. Of course, they learn all too late...it's NOT an act.

Director Tim Sullivan, scripting here with co-writer Chris Kobin, knows that 'Ghouls Just Wanna Have Fun' - and that includes the audience. Those movie watchers who would be profoundly outraged and insulted by 2001 MANIACS probably wouldn't (and shouldn't) be renting or going out to see this anyway. For the rest of us...well, we know what we want and what we like to see in our horror films, and thankfully, Tim provides it in abundance! Not content to merely rehash the Lewis original, he surprises with hysterical references to other movies, while keeping the action going and the blood flowing! (Think of a couple of scenes here as DELIVERANCE by way of AIRPLANE!, and you get the tone of it!)

The death scenes, if not completely original in some ways, are still delivered with gruesome effectiveness, and there is a nice "Tales From The Crypt"-style ending to wrap it neatly with a pretty, dripping-red bow.

Oh, and BTW, did I mention that this is unofficially a 'musical'? That's right, gore-hounds! A couple of ZZ Top-types, (just with banjos and 'sharp-dressed men' for the 1700's) deliver some spicy song commentary on the action! But thankfully, the ditties are inserted in a way that is terrific and not tiresome.

All in all, for an evening of blood and boobs, you might think you can do better than 2001 MANIACS, but that's debatable. I know you can do worse! And I have - trust me.
  • cchase
  • Dec 4, 2008
  • Permalink
5/10

Inferior remake but so-so on its own

In the 2000s, it seemed a fad to take old cult horror movies and remake them. Sometimes it worked, most of the time it didn't. This one at least went out of its way to expand on the mythos of its predecessor

Should anyone be given the role of Mayor Buford, one should devour the scenery. Robert Englund, bless his heart, does just that, and in the most delightfully cheesy manner. The victims, downgraded from rational adults to a bunch of obnoxious college students, deserve no sympathy to the point that in the first five minutes, you just want all of them to die.

The violence is admirable, only one of the death scenes is a callback to the original. Blood effects are standard 2005 slasher movie level but they're gruesome all the same. The writers got creative and they get props.

In this modernized version, minority victims are introduced, an African-American man and an Asian woman, both of whom are subject to racism. But this is expected as the antagonists, after all, are Civil War era Southerners. That said, this movie is in no short supply of Southern popular culture references, mostly to Gone with the Wind.

All in all, when comparing to the 1964 Herschell Gordon Lewis cult classic, 2001 Maniacs is simply a contemporary upgrade but watch it as a standalone, it's okay.
  • Galop_Inferno
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • Permalink
7/10

2001 Maniacs (2005)

  • jonahstewartvaughan
  • Jun 6, 2023
  • Permalink
3/10

Good but not perfect.

22 of 23 people found the following review helpful:

2001 Maniacs - A Great Remake!, February 20, 2006 By Steve67 "Steve500067" (Dallas, Texas United States) - See all my reviews

The film starts out like any other , basically a group of friends and fellow peers take a wrong detour and end up in strange southern town,where all the towns people are dressed as if they where stuck in a time-warp of the 1800s. Of course the travelers decide to stay the night with promises a grand celebration to be held shortly after. Sadly the group is unaware that they'll be the main course of the feast. It does'NT take long before members of group are separated and picked off one at a time by the townies, each ruling in a horrific, gore-tactic death; speaking of which , one of my favorite deaths probably have to be one of the first ones involving horses and the tearing of limbs. When the movie isn't focusing on the youngly's getting themselves killed, we're treated to an abundance of boobs and campy humor to keep the pace going. The original was slow paced and boring at times but that not the case here. When it all comes down to it, Maniacs kept its promise and delivers the goods, which should be enough to please us horror fans. Overall the promise of T&A and loads of gore were delivered. Added with the campy humor,Maniacs ends up as a fun and entertaining no-brainier,gore filled ride that horror fans should not miss. I say check it out!

Starring: Robert Englund, Lin Shaye, Giuseppe Andrews, Jay Gillespie. Director: Tim Sullivan.
  • Gunnar_Runar_Ingibjargarson
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • Permalink
7/10

Dancing and Games, and Best of All, a Mouth-Watering Barbecue

While traveling on vacation to Florida, the college friends Anderson Lee (Jay Gillespie), Cory Jones (Matthe Carey) and Nelson Elliot (Dylan Edrington) meet the gorgeous Joey (Marla Leigh Malcom) and Kat (Gina Marie Heekin) in a gas station traveling with their gay friend Ricky (Brian Gross) to the same location. Anderson gives his phone number to Joey in Florida. The teenagers decide to take a shortcut and they find a detour through an old road leading to the Southern town of Pleasant Valley. They are welcomed by the local Mayor Buckman (Robert Englund) as guests of honor together with Joey, Kat, Ricky and the Afro-American biker Malcolm (Mushond Lee) and his Chinese girlfriend Leah (Bianca Smith) and invited to stay for their Guts and Glory Jubilee with free lodging, meals and booze at Granny Boone's hotel, and dancing, games and a mouth-watering barbecue in the climax of the jubilee. The group accepts the invitation but sooner they find who will supply the meat for the feast.

"2001 Maniacs" is a movie with great potential of cult, having black humor, gorgeous actresses and an excellent twist in the end. I really liked this gore film a lot, and I laugh with the witty, funny and great lines, and many of them are quoted in IMDb. Robert England is amazing in the role of the revengeful southern mayor, giving a perfect touch of humor to his sadistic and friendly character. In the end, "those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it". My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "2001 Maníacos" ("2001 Maniacs")
  • claudio_carvalho
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • Permalink
5/10

Not Bad

  • gwnightscream
  • Aug 6, 2020
  • Permalink
8/10

"Over the top" is just scratching the surface...

Those already familiar with the original will know what they've gotten themselves into as our main characters follow a bogus Detour sign—just after narrowly avoiding Justin and Professor Mambo, character favorites from CABIN FEVER who are trying to hitch a ride—and arrive in the town of Pleasant Valley, whose residents are hard at work preparing for their weekend "Guts and Glory Jubilee." Soon the Confederate knife fodder arrive with Yankee good looks and are declared "guests of honor" by the one-eyed Mayor Buckman, played pitch-perfect by everybody's favorite sadist, Robert (Freddy Krueger) Englund. But what else can you expect when there's a population of, you guessed it, 2001…maniacs, that is! What follows, surprisingly given our times and political climate, is refreshingly vulgar, completely un-PC and, much like the original, an expected excuse for extremely sadistic humor and gore. Where the first film now seems boring and slow, the new version is upbeat and well-paced. Happily and sadly, the first and only fully clothed female victim to get tied up and quartered by horses is the film's only waste of T in a movie overflowing with T&A. Many viewers may be offended by the black humor and straight-up racist jokes that pepper the film's dialogue, but those of you can rest assured that everyone gets their due by the end. It'll be interesting to see how the red states will react to such a searing and scabrous document of the South. Englund seems to imbue Mayor Buckman with a well-judged imitation of President Bush, and even the lives of his two sons in the film appear to closely ape those of the Bush daughters.

Longtime Lewis fans will be ecstatic that much, if not all, of his score from the original has been transferred to the new film by way of musical narrators Johnny Legend and his strumming sidekick Scott Spiegel. Somewhat in the vein of THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY, these musical country bumpkins pop up from time to time, like Sullivan's version of a Greek Chorus, hinting at the dangers to soon befall our ethnically and morally diverse blue state victims. "The South will rise again!" The supporting cast is stocked with many fine new actors and veterans of the genre. Fans will enjoy the cool seething evil of Giuseppe Andrews (Fever's Deputy Winston) as he kills Yankee belles with kindness, and Lin Shaye (fast on her way to becoming a middle-aged scream queen after her role in the haunting DEAD END), who stars as Granny Boone, the murderous matriarch of Pleasant Valley. One day, this fine actress will hopefully be cast in a role that capitalizes on her real-life beauty and sassy charm; in the meantime, she here has a ball pushing the envelope, as when she sucks the red gore off a spear protruding from the gullet of a hapless victim! Newcomer Jay Gillespie evokes a REAL GENIUS or TOP GUN-era Val Kilmer with stern good looks and a thrill for the action around him. The rest of the MANIACS cast seem to be having fun with the bloody lowbrow horror and are in on the joke, all ready to "take one for the team" and die in a less-than-flattering manner. As each member is dispatched, you can tell they were having a great time taking it to the next level. This is a movie where "over the top" is just scratching the surface. Just ask Peaches, the Southern belle who wears a "retainer" that would make the shark in JAWS envious when she "services" a good ol' boy! (He doesn't last long.) By the third reel, characters are walking around town all alone for no good reason, so we know they aren't going to end up much better than their missing brethren. Then Sullivan and crew punch up the action a bit with a scene that doesn't necessarily match the vibe of everything we've seen thus far, but has a maggot-worthy moment that makes up for the switch in tone. If you're looking to get scared, this is not exactly the right film, but if you're familiar with Lewis and his brand of goremongering, you'll squirm, screech and then writhe with laughter. 2001 MANIACS has all the elements of a good time yet still raises a dialogue among viewers that not many have had the balls to address in horror, or film-making in general, since the '70s.
  • horrorfan921
  • Feb 20, 2006
  • Permalink
6/10

not bad

  • aotemanmi
  • Feb 1, 2022
  • Permalink

2001 maniacs:a flesh odyssey

People who do not know the first movie ("Two thousand maniacs" Hershell Gordon Lewis 1964) may have a look.The others should not bother.The first movie was not only Old Dixie's revenge:it was also a spoof on Vincente MInnelli's "Brigadoon",a bloody one.It filled its quota of horror -for the time it was daring ,since we have seen worse- and ,more interesting,black humor.

What does the remake offer? A boring lecture -so boring the students are snoring- on the Civil War in case the audience would not be aware of how horrible that war was (was/is there a war which isn't ?I'd like to know);a party where the students are on the menu,nothing new under the sun;and lots and lots of sex,much more sex than in the Lewis version;one should note that the "heroes" are younger: in 1964,the victims ,if my memory serves me well,were already working,one of them was a schoolteacher.
  • dbdumonteil
  • Nov 23, 2007
  • Permalink
3/10

Just another forgettable horror film trying to be cute

I'm really sick of this type of horror film---slick and glossy and trying so hard to be cute and witty.This is just another waste of time in a horror fan's quest to find the good horror films.These people ripped off HG Lewis and still managed to make a lame movie.

A group of college kids head to Daytona on spring break and get detoured through a small southern town and are the guests to the town BBQ.You can pretty much figure out the rest from there.Lots of rubber heads spewing watery looking blood and body parts here and there.The usual standard crap film stuff.A silly almost nonexistent plot and sub-par acting and no suspense at all makes this film lame as a wet noodle.Even the few bare breasts thrown in couldn't save this movie.Robert Englund does a decent enough job with the silly lines he was given but all the other folks in this film were pretty rotten actors.The writing was awful as well---just a bunch of catchphrases and lines meant to sound cool strung together in one scene after another.

I really hate horror movie directors that keep churning out these kinds of cutesy witless horror movies full of dim-bulb teens just standing around waiting to get killed in some supposedly new horrible way.

I've seen enough dead teens to last a lifetime.It's time for horror film directors to move on down the road to something else.
  • mrush
  • May 5, 2006
  • Permalink
1/10

Craappyy...

  • solidsnake_971
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • Permalink

The south will disappear!!!

  • Esken
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • Permalink
7/10

More of that Southern hospitality...

HG Lewis' gore classic Two Thousand Maniacs isn't the obvious choice for the remake treatment, but surprisingly enough it got one - and it's pretty damn good! Actually, I'd say that this film is more of a sequel than a remake, as it takes in the same basic plot idea as the sixties splatterfest, but other than that the film is mostly new. And besides, the Godfather of Gore did promise us that the South was going to rise again. The film takes in many of Lewis' trademarks; from over the top silly gore, to a great streak of black humour. The Southern swing has been retained too, and we get treated to all manner of weird Redneck traits - best of all being the pair of minstrels that pop up every now and again to sing us a song! As mentioned, the basic plot remains the same and follows a bunch of young kids who end up in the strange town of Pleasant Valley after taking several detours. They arrive just as the town is about to take up it's Jubilee celebrations, and believe it or not; the teenagers become the guests of honour! However, they end up being offered more than just free beer...

The fact that the film features the questionable talents of a bunch of young actors will no doubt annoy fans of the original, as it could easily be taken that the film is taking in too many of modern horror's traits. However, I disagree; the young cast do well in their respective roles, and the characters are generally quite easy to like. It's the older cast members that really make the movie stand out, however, and it's obvious that Robert Englund had a good time playing the central role he has in this film. He is joined by prolific actress Lin Shaye, who also does well as his opposite number. Obviously, the most important thing about this film is the gore - and in true HG Lewis fashion, it's amazingly over the top! We've got acid, limb-tearing, eye popping, a nasty little scene involving metal teeth and more! The gore is hard to take seriously...and HG fans will know why that's a good thing. It has to be said that the film is a little messy, but it doesn't matter because it's a constant stream of entertainment. If we're not witnessing a bloody death scene, there's always plenty of naked chicks and Southern 'hospitality' on hand to keep the film fun. Overall, I recommend this film.
  • The_Void
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • Permalink
5/10

A Southern Guilty Pleasure

I bet Herschell Gordon Lewis, having just completed work on his second gore epic Two Thousand Maniacs, never once imagined that in roughly forty years his brainchild would be re-filmed and remade again. Instead of "the South will rise again, " it should be Herschell Gordon Lewis will rise again. Anyway, this film, like the original, has the happy town of Pleasant Valley as its setting: a town that magically reappears every 100 years on the anniversary of its destruction by Union soldiers during the Civil War only to have its hillbilly celebration of maiming, garroting, shivving, castrating, squeezing, quartering, barbecuing, decapitating, and so on of Yankee motorists in the nearby vicinity. Just like in the original, though much more bloodier and believable, nothing here is really frightening. Every gory scene is more like a punchline to a distasteful joke. Also, just like in the original, the South comes off looking like some barbaric civilization that is ages behind the more industrial North. The Southern stereotypes fly in this one though seem not to have the edge in the original film. What this film does have that the original does not are way better actors, lots and lots and lots of sexy women in lots and lots and lots of sexual situations, generous doses of humour(almost all of which were INTENDED), and a tongue firmly planted in cheek mood. Robert Englund plays Mayor Buckman to the hilt, even wearing an eye patch with the Confederate flag on it no less. Englund shows me here, as he has in other non-Freddy roles, that he is a versatile actor with a wide range. His Buckman has charm, grace, and dementia. Lin Shaye does an equally credible job playing Granny Boone(not to my knowledge in original). Everyone else is more than adequate working with this stuff. Johnny Legend and Scott Spiegel had me rolling as two wandering minstrels singing atrocious blue grass tunes with the most inane lyrics. And let's not forget the girls. The film has a bevy of beauties with a free and easy approach to being in front of the camera. Standouts(knockouts might be more appropriate) include Gina Marie Heeken, Bianca Smith, Wendy Kremer, and sultry Christa Campbell as the milk maid. Director Tim Sullivan knows exactly what he wants and goes right for it in this film. No high art here, just an appreciative group of filmmakers remaking a film I too would never have dreamt of being remade. The odd thing is that this film is far more watchable then the original. It has so much more going for it than the original - which does have some charms - don't get me wrong. Sullivan knows his audience and goes with the proverbial flow. He doesn't stray away from the shocking nor the easy, distasteful laugh(like when the black Yankee is presented as "dark" meat as just one example).
  • BaronBl00d
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • Permalink
6/10

Demented cannibal comedy

2001 MANIACS is a cheesy B-movie remake of a cult H. G. Wells gore film of the 1960s entitled 2000 MANIACS. This is a low budget production, packed to the brim with rubbery gore effects and a hammy turn from A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET star Robert Englund, and yet despite (or maybe because of) all this it turns out to be a surprisingly enjoyable little movie.

I think the film works because the tone is just right. There's a ton of black comedy here, some of it blacker than black (like when the black guy turns up in the southern town asking where black guys hang around, and the locals point him to the nearest lynching tree). The story is relatively fast-paced, and you can be sure that there will be a grisly murder just around the next corner.

The acting is less impressive, and some of the characters are just a little TOO over the top (yes, even in a film like this) but yet it somehow hangs together. It's clear that Englund is having a ball as the demented town mayor and there are cameos from Peter Stormare and Eli Roth as the story progresses. None of it is scary or disturbing, but it is funny in places and it's certainly miles better than the amateurish original.
  • Leofwine_draca
  • Nov 20, 2014
  • Permalink
1/10

Shocking

  • peter-ramshaw-1
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • Permalink
7/10

Yeeeeee hawwwww!!!!

There is no denying that cult director H. G. Lewis was a huge influence on the horror genre with his gratuitous gore-fests of the 60s, but there is also no avoiding the fact that, for the most part, his films were shoddily produced, poorly acted efforts that relied on their graphic violence and T&A to draw in the crowds—definitely something of an acquired taste.

This remake of Lewis' best film, 2000 Maniacs, isn't exactly a work of art either, but, in the spirit of the original, it is enjoyably daft, extremely bloody, and features plenty of attractive women in various states of undress.

Sticking fairly close to the premise of Lewis' movie, 2001 Maniacs sees a group of fun loving students who, whilst travelling South for spring break, stumble upon the town of Pleasant Valley, where they are invited by the mayor to be guests of honour at the annual celebrations. Unfortunately, the people of Pleasant Valley are actually revenge hungry ghosts who were slaughtered by the Yankees during the American Civil War, and who plan to kill the new arrivals and serve them up at their Jubilee Bar-B-Q.

The film's cast is headed by old Freddy himself, genre great Robert Englund, who has a marvellous time hamming it up as one-eyed Yankee-hating Mayor Buckman, leader of the spooky townsfolk, and he is ably supported by the always reliable Lin Shaye, as Granny Boone, whose job it is to prepare the guests for dinner—by having them killed, gutted and roasted on a spit!

Also playing memorable members of the vengeful dead are Cabin Fever's Giuseppe Andrews as psycho Southern gent Harper Alexander, Ryan Fleming as Hucklebilly (a killer hick with a particularly peculiar voice), and Wendy Kremer as the slutty metal-fang wearing bitch Peaches.

As far as the victims are concerned, it's the stunning Gina Marie Heekin and the gorgeous Marla Malcolm that impressed me the most. Ugly they ain't!

Of course, the other 'stars' of the film—the gore effects by the K.N.B. EFX Group—are also something special to behold: there is a juicy 'quartering' (dismemberment via four horses), several decapitations, an emasculation, a nasty impalement (up the butt and out the mouth), and several crushings (one of which is quite literally eye-popping!).

Just like Herschell G. Lewis' 2000 Maniacs, director Tim Sullivan's 2001 Maniacs is a shamelessly silly, wickedly un-PC, unabashedly gory, tongue-in-cheek trash horror flick, made for an audience at ease with on-screen blood 'n' guts and au fait with the splatter genre. In short: it's fun!
  • BA_Harrison
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • Permalink
1/10

Re-makes vs. Sequels

OK Where to start with this one? When are these directors going to learn that if you want to earn some money by "piggybacking" off of a previously proved successful film such as Herschell Gordon Lewis' "Two Thousand Maniacs" that's fine but don't insult the fans by using only a handful of the original character names yet creating an entirely different movie! This movie definitely does not skimp in the gore department, it has some very good acting, and Robert England cast in the lead to boot makes for a potentially good film but true fans of the original film, which let's face it is what the majority of the audience who will attend a film with such a title will consist of, will be sorely disappointed at the blatant disregard for the original storyline! Instead of being promoted as a re-make, films like this should be promoted as sequels,that is if the director is so void of original ideas that he or she feels that they must rip-off someone else's original idea instead of coming up with one of their own. The "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" and "Black Christmas" remakes are also guilty of this offense...this is why these remakes flop. I have yet to see a "remake" that truly does justice to the original product outside of 80's remakes like "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" or "The Blob"...save yourselves the embarrassment and degradation and the snubbing of the fans and just call it a sequel instead of trying to create your own franchise. The other aspect of this film that I did not care for was the director's inexplicable need to add certain elements to the story in a tacky, crude and downright politically incorrect attempt to 'modernize' the story. I personally do not find it humorous to hear tacky "Watermellon" jokes applied to African Americans and I found the addition of the gay character and his subsequent death to be in EXTREMELY poor taste!
  • alanmora
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • Permalink
8/10

Good times!

I saw "2001 Manacs" last night at a midnight screening at the Fantasia Festival and I really enjoyed it ... so did the 300-400 other people in the theater with me. Tim Sullivan and Christa Campbell introduced the movie and held a Q&A session after (I had to leave, it was 2am) but I'm sure they were pleased with the audience response. It was great to see Robert Englund again, he always does a great psycho. The movie was funny and gory ... sure the plot wasn't Oscar caliber, but anyone looking for that is going to the wrong movie. If you want to see a good horror movie, the real 'guts & glory' kind, this is the movie for you. I feel confident in recommending this movie and plan on picking up the DVD (especially since the version that was screened hasn't gone to the ratings board yet, so the DVD will probably be the only place to see this exact version).
  • ravyn_jensen
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • Permalink
6/10

Quality Gore Effects

There are some movies that are b grade and terrible , then there are those movies that are b grade and not to bad. This movie is not to bad! You are not going to get some deep dark tale here but more a movie that doesn't take itself too seriously. Guys and girls end up in a funky redneck town after taking a detour only to find that the inhabitants aren't as friendly as they appear. One by one they are brutally murdered. The actors all in all are pretty good. I have to admit the only reason i got this was for some gore filled moments to chuckle at and the movie didn't disappoint. Nice old school gore effects done without computers (except the last scene maybe)... Get it for a laugh...
  • Baloomboshamanaka
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • Permalink
1/10

Wow, I can't believe this movie was even made.

Such a bad movie. OK, OK they had Robert Englund which is good, I mean he known for the Nightmare On Elm Street movies and people know him. But my goodness. The actors were bad and so was the general plot. And also, must there be something about sex every few lines. Like with the girl cousins and how almost everything was so sexual no matter what it was. And how convenient that all the girls there happened to be beautiful, bleach blonde, hussy's. Plus the deaths were so violent and gruesome and disgusting!!! Don't get me wrong, a good bloody death can be scary but those scenes were just ridiculous!!! I am going to bring this up again....the acting was TERRIBLE. Who ever made the casting and thought to them selves "wow, what good up coming actors" should NEVER cast again.....EVER. So, in my opinion skip this movie.
  • kaybelle
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.