The journey of 19th-century frontiersman Ephraim MacIver and the adventures, stories, and homosexual relationships he had with other men in the American wilderness.The journey of 19th-century frontiersman Ephraim MacIver and the adventures, stories, and homosexual relationships he had with other men in the American wilderness.The journey of 19th-century frontiersman Ephraim MacIver and the adventures, stories, and homosexual relationships he had with other men in the American wilderness.
Richard Hoyt
- Indian Guru
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
Was told to watch this because it's a classic and important piece of gay cinema. Some cowboys fall in love, one of them spends some time with some offensive Native American stereotypes. One closeted guy gets outed at the end, I was only sort of still following the movie at that point, I was so bored. I was able to sit through it but my GOD what a boring slog! This thing could've been about 20 minutes but was long and drawn out with not much happening. Plenty of eye candy, though, I guess. Pretty soft core. I'm a gay man myself, so I can understand the significance of having a movie like this back in the 70s, but just because it was important doesn't make it good. Not entertaining.
Filmed in 1970 from Richard AMORY's 1966 pulp novel of the same title, it is the story of a young man searching for love and happiness in the American West of the 1870's, coming to accept his homosexuality and through that self-acceptance becoming the man he was born to be.
Thirty years on it is painfully obvious that the Native Americans are played by European-Americans with bad make-up and for the more mature actors, gym-buffed bodies. The scenery is real, however, and the acting, if not up to "A" standards is no worse than the acting in most "B" pictures. However, whatever its faults, this film tells it's story with an honesty not found in American films until the late 1980's. I strongly recommend it for students of Gay Studies.
There is full-frontal male nudity and the film is erotic. It is not, however, pornographic. (It does not have an all-male cast.) While not rated by the MPAA, I would give it an "R".
Released in VHS in 1994 by Something Weird Video, it is available in both colour and black and white. If you are buying, insist on the colour version.
Early in the summer of 2000 this film was not in the IMDb to-day it is listed with only a director's credit. A "people" search for the actors credited on the box comes-up with only one name match, Jon EVANS. If he is the same man, I do not yet know.
Thirty years on it is painfully obvious that the Native Americans are played by European-Americans with bad make-up and for the more mature actors, gym-buffed bodies. The scenery is real, however, and the acting, if not up to "A" standards is no worse than the acting in most "B" pictures. However, whatever its faults, this film tells it's story with an honesty not found in American films until the late 1980's. I strongly recommend it for students of Gay Studies.
There is full-frontal male nudity and the film is erotic. It is not, however, pornographic. (It does not have an all-male cast.) While not rated by the MPAA, I would give it an "R".
Released in VHS in 1994 by Something Weird Video, it is available in both colour and black and white. If you are buying, insist on the colour version.
Early in the summer of 2000 this film was not in the IMDb to-day it is listed with only a director's credit. A "people" search for the actors credited on the box comes-up with only one name match, Jon EVANS. If he is the same man, I do not yet know.
This film is available. I got a copy and enjoyed it. I suggest you read the book (it is available again)and then watch the movie. Some of the actions in the movie are explained in the book so it makes better sense. If you watch this movie understanding when it was made and the attitude toward gay books and movies, it is amazing it was made at all. The story tells of love and learning between several men and shows the problems the characters had in the story still exist today. The acting is a little stilted and the filming was not great; however, it is a classic which will go down in movie history as ground breaking. I hope you can get a copy to watch.
This takes place in the American West of the 1870s. A young man named Ephiram (Morgan Royce) is in the wilderness fleeing a vicious male lover. He runs into Indians and hunky Cyrus Wheelwright (John Iverson). He begins to realize he's gay but has trouble coming to grips with it because of his ex. Can Cyrus and some Indian mystics help Ephiram realize that being gay is not bad?
For its time this was groundbreaking. It's probably the first gay coming of age story caught on film. It was shot in color but I unfortunately saw it in black & white on an old VHS tape. Still the cinematography was beautiful. It looks good in b&w--I can only imagine how color would look. The script is interesting--some of the talks about men loving men are fascinating (for its time). There's also a beautiful fireside talk between Ephram and Cyrus leading to a tender kiss. There is male nudity (including frontal) but nothing explicit. The two sex scenes show absolutely nothing that could be considered hard core. Still, the MPAA seems to have issues with male nudity so they would probably slap it with an NC-17. The cast themselves are all handsome men with nice bodies. Surprisingly even the acting is good--especially by Iverson. The only debit is Royce. He is beautiful--but can't act. The poor guy DOES try but it's no go. Because of that I can only give this a 9. Still well worth catching. Try to see it in color--I'm sure it must be beautiful.
For its time this was groundbreaking. It's probably the first gay coming of age story caught on film. It was shot in color but I unfortunately saw it in black & white on an old VHS tape. Still the cinematography was beautiful. It looks good in b&w--I can only imagine how color would look. The script is interesting--some of the talks about men loving men are fascinating (for its time). There's also a beautiful fireside talk between Ephram and Cyrus leading to a tender kiss. There is male nudity (including frontal) but nothing explicit. The two sex scenes show absolutely nothing that could be considered hard core. Still, the MPAA seems to have issues with male nudity so they would probably slap it with an NC-17. The cast themselves are all handsome men with nice bodies. Surprisingly even the acting is good--especially by Iverson. The only debit is Royce. He is beautiful--but can't act. The poor guy DOES try but it's no go. Because of that I can only give this a 9. Still well worth catching. Try to see it in color--I'm sure it must be beautiful.
Did you know
- TriviaScott Hanson (a.k.a. Skylar Robbins) and Joe Tiffenbach were respectively hired as director and cinematographer on the project after the producer was so impressed with their first short film The Closet (1969) that he released it in his own theatre chain. But a few days before they were nearly done filming, they were fired from the set. As the outdoor scenes were mostly complete, the film was edited without the missing footage, and finished by the editor Andrew Herbert (credited as sole director) and the producer.
- ConnectionsEdited into Twisted Sex Vol. 23 (2007)
Details
- Runtime1 hour 19 minutes
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content