The Seductress

This movie would be better to watch and enjoy if there were not any stupid conversations wich are as senseless as the entire plot.It's another of those movies where the only thing that matters is sex scenes.I watched this movie on TV so I couldn't use a remote to wind it. Well, I could change the channel from time to time and so I did. Gabriela Hall and Shauna O'Brien could be seen in lots of soft-porn movies over last ten years so you can really get annoyed when you see them do "it" once again, not mentioning that both ladies (especially Gabi) have no idea of acting. Hall is sweet (as always), O'Brien is dangerous (as always) and they both are (or they think they are) seductive.Jarod Carey and Johnny Angelino-those two guys can do just one thing on a movie shot-take their clothes off and fake sex.Well, sex scenes are good, they almost show it all, I guess the best scenes are those three at the beginning when O'Brien has sex with her husbands whom she is about to kill. You can enjoy this movie if you have DVD player-just go to the scene you like the most.

There isn't much "tempting" about this flick, other than the usual nude display of two good looking B actresses, Gabriella Hall and former Playboy model, Shauna O'Brien. They are, by the way, the only real credits worth mentioning, as few others actually appear for any length of time in this movie. Other than some so-so male/female scenes, nothing else is worth mentioning. The plot is the usual humdrum nonsense - a police researcher (Hall) believes there is a black widow on the loose (O'Brien), killing off her rich newlywed husband, and then moving on to a new one. I find it hard to believe that there was a Summer Temptations 1, but if there was, it must have been better than this to get someone to make a sequel. There are much better B-movies (including many with the same actresses) to waste your time with.

First of all let me tell you that I'm not a pervert. Merely a regular guy that sees a movie cover and says, "WOW! I gotta see this." I was working (more like "helping" out) at a video store when I decided to rent this. The 2 ladies on the cover were HOT and in one picture on the back they were wearing bikinis and in a pool. WELL... NOT ONLY did that scene NOT appear in the movie, but the plot was STUPID!! Keep in mind, EVEN BY EROTIC STRAIGHT-TO-VIDEO standards. It's about a female serial killer that marries guys and kills them. For some reason this other woman is obsessed with newspaper articles about the serial chick. Well one day they happened to meet and... let me just get to the end. It turns out the 2 women were sisters!! No, not long lost sisters. Rather sisters both on the run for killing people when they were teens. Now for some reason they acted like they NEVER, EVER, EVER MET BEFORE IN THEIR LIVES!! What the FUDGE??!! Even as a porno this would make you say, "HUH!" There are other odd moments like the ending (which was totally rushed). YOU CALL THAT A POLICE STATION!! The serial chick, which also appears in Zorrita (where she looks somewhat hot), looks like a MAN who had a sex change in this one. The other woman is hot atleast. Oh and about that back cover. When I finally read it, it actually GAVE AWAY THE ENDING!! How odd?! The actual "shocking" ending these types of movies claim to have. Wonder why I didn't read it before. No wonder that pool picture was there. After I returned the movie someone told me I should have just rented porn. How true.

A not very exciting or stimulating film just a routine soft core erotica production. Although they may have many fans, I myself do not find Gabriella Hall or Shauna O'Brien all that attractive, especially Ms. O'Brien with her nearly malformed breasts. Does she think those phony breasts turn men on?