[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
L'Enfer des marines (1964)

User reviews

L'Enfer des marines

9 reviews
5/10

As average as it gets

First, a note about the rankings. So far, this movie is at about 3/10 from IMDb viewers, even though this is clearly a perfect representation of an average film, an obvious 5/10, which we'll get into later.

In fact a plurality of voters rate it 5, but the next highest numbers are those who rated it 1 and 10, and maybe 2, which is clearly voting to change the statistics. I don't blame the 10 voters. They may really like it. It is an okay film, and they probably felt a need to counter what were votes for subversive purposes only. We know that many people on IMDb are in the movie business, or related to current directors, actors, etc, and have interests that aren't fair representations. Maybe someday, this will change. I can prove this, because older films, like this one, get lower rankings from these 1 and 2 voters, and newer movies get too many 9 and 10 rankings. When this is brought up, those voters will come up with obvious lies for the reasons why. Explanations that don't make a bit of sense when one is familiar with the films.

So lets be fair to this movie.

It's more of a gung ho war film than many people like, but not overly so. It's set in the Korean War, and the Koreans are the enemy. Those people brainwashed by MASH may not like it, but believe it or not, during the Korean War we actually had some Americans who were on our side, even nurses like the one in the film. That may hit some modern day people below the belt. Don't get me wrong. I had fun with the MASH TV series, too, I'm liberal, and anti war, and I won't be a gung ho camp follower. Still, there's a definite line between liberal and outright Treason and Treachory.

Jim Davis gets to be the main main here in a five man unit without an officer. They have an objective, and come across the nurse.

There aren't any over-dramatizations here. The people act very normal. It probably would have been a better movie if it wasn't for the goofy video of nurses as described by the group's malcontent. I understand why the director did it, but it was a bad call. It looked as silly in the twentieth century as it does today.

Other than that, the characters are very believable, except for the final gung ho self sacrifices that result in only two casualties.

So the good and bad balance each other out, with nothing spectacular, but nothing horrendous. Aside from the goofy "soft porn nurse" scene, it flows pretty well. 5/10 solid.
  • drystyx
  • Jun 23, 2011
  • Permalink
5/10

L Q Jones Korean War Low Low Budget Actioner

  • verbusen
  • Mar 14, 2009
  • Permalink
5/10

This isn't a Red Cross to them It's a Bullseye!

  • sol-kay
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • Permalink

Of all the war movies ever made, this was one of them

  • lemon_magic
  • Aug 11, 2011
  • Permalink
5/10

War film meets soft porn.

  • jt_3d
  • Jun 7, 2010
  • Permalink
2/10

Oh Korea

  • BandSAboutMovies
  • Mar 11, 2020
  • Permalink
4/10

Not bad but hardly too impressive either

Interested in watching a mediocre war movie? Well, you've come to the right place! Set in the Korean War, a platoon are assigned a task to take out a big gun. Along the way they bicker a lot and come into contact with a stranded nurse. Randomly, there are three segments where we see erotic recollections of the men, which was kind of bizarre. Overall, its not bad but hardly too impressive either.
  • Red-Barracuda
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • Permalink
2/10

It's not the cheapness of the budget that's the issue.

  • mark.waltz
  • Sep 16, 2024
  • Permalink
4/10

A War Film That Doesn't Quite Realize Its Potential

This film begins during the Korean War with an officer by the name of "Lieutenant Collins" (Joe Jenckes) being ordered to assemble a squad of soldiers to locate and destroy an enemy gun battery hidden somewhere along a mountain range. To that effect, he deliberately chooses a soldier by the name of "Sergeant Walsh" (Jim Davis) to be in his squad due to a grudge he has with him. That very afternoon, however, Lieutenant Collins is killed in action which subsequently leaves Sergeant Walsh in charge. Naturally, being a professional soldier, Sergeant Walsh continues on with the mission and its during this time that they come upon an American ambulance which has been temporarily put out of action due to enemy action. Not far from the ambulance is a female officer named "Lieutenant Laura Fleming" (Margo Woode) who has not only been knocked unconscious but also needs to be escorted back to her MASH unit and away from the front lines. The problem is that the enemy gun battery is still in operation and, if they don't eliminate it, an entire American convoy will pay the price. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this was an okay film, for the most part. Which suffered from the inclusion of certain semi-erotic scenes thrown in to simulate a soldier's memory of various events. It was all rather cheap and trashy--and totally unnecessary as the rest of the film was quite solid. Be that as it may, although I don't consider this particular picture to be that bad necessarily, the previously mentioned scenes certainly didn't help matters, and I have rated it accordingly. Slightly below average.
  • Uriah43
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.