[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Eerie, Indiana (1998)

User reviews

Eerie, Indiana

7 reviews

They tried, they almost succeeded

I have to admit: Eerie, Indiana, The Other Dimension did better than I expected. But the series lacked the seriousness of the other show. More than anything, the adventures of Mitchell and Stanley seemed purely for the chance to do continuous gags, than an actual plot. And the kids just weren't as believable - they unfortunately did not have the grasp of their characters that Omri Katz and Justin Shenkarow had.

The show was also rushed out at a time when FOX already had at least one show of this nature. Two at once was pure overload.

I feel I must also mention that the books written for the series at times had more detail and plot than the show itself, another reason to its failure.

It tried. And you had to admire the effort. But the original Eerie, Indiana was creepier, better written, and better acted.
  • Sparrow_in_flight
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • Permalink
5/10

This feels like the deformed twin of the original show

I don't know, I never really watched much of it, but when I was a kid and we didn't have a PC or internet at home, I'd accidentally watch a few episodes of this on TV, but it always felt short compared to the original one.

Like, it tried to do the exact same thing, but it just didn't work out. It has that feeling, like a parallel dimension where everything is kinda the same yet a bit different.

I could never identify with the characters and they looked very weird and unlikable, and I even felt regret they aren't showing the original version, but this one instead.

On the other hand, I've rewatched the original show twice or thrice already and I still enjoy it as an adult. Too bad it didn't get more seasons.

If you want to watch this so bad, go ahead, but mark my words, as soon as you see a few episodes, you will realize this is a waste of time and the original is better.
  • tianlansha
  • Oct 5, 2019
  • Permalink
2/10

Truly awful but one singular gem

This is a terrible show, not worth reviewing. The worst of the worst was "I'm Okay, You're Really Weird," which goes against the theme of Eerie, Indiana with a message that one needs to grow up by giving up all childish things. This is essentially a children's show. What are they thinking?

And on top of that, it feels like they were making fun of a villain who is established as brain damaged, with a metal plate in his head that picks up radio stations.

On the other hand, the one good episode is "Perfect" which should play well with the child audience. It features the older sister more prominently and has a good message. Even has a nice "Twilight Zone" vibe.

But generally speaking, this is a pale shadow of the original series, underwrites all the grownups and fails to flesh out the townspeople as they are more cartoonish than the originals, making it hard to take any of this seriously --even as a children's show.
  • tlyoung88
  • Feb 26, 2021
  • Permalink
1/10

Waste of time and money

Whether it was a cheap production or not, those monies could have been used for something much better. I'm going to give credit for trying to continue on the original Eerie Indiana (1991), but there is nothing that captured me with this version. Just as in movie sequels. If the sequel does not have any actors from the first movie, it wont be the same! If you watched the original Eerie Indiana and fell in love with those characters then the actors that played them will stay as the "real" characters, if you know what I mean. Seeing those actors as Mitchell and Stanley makes me wanna cry. It just looks like a parody on Marshall and Simon! And how can I say this without being rude... Mitchell and Stanley isn't the most "manly" names either... it's all a parody! I'm sorry but this version did not work at all for me! Omri, Justin, Jason... everyone from Eerie (1991) only gets sorely missed watching this version. It's so so so so sad that the show was canceled, but if ever making a remake... I doubt I would like it. If ever making a "sequel" kinda thing it would need to have the same actors... just an older version...

Over and out!
  • LittleNiniel
  • Nov 5, 2006
  • Permalink

Not As Good As The Original...

As with so many things in recent years that have come out of the archive and remade for a modern audience, Eerie Indiana: The Other Dimension does not have the charm of the original. Why this is really unknown because it looks and feels the same as the original (apart from the cast) but... well I don't know. I think it just wants to be an updated Goosebumps really using the Eerie Indiana template but doesn't pull it off.

One of the episodes, I presume the first in the run to set the series up, uses archive footage of the original series to try and explain (not very well it has to be said) that the wierdness of Indiana has spilled over into a new dimension. It should have worked. Just the way it was done ruined everything. The rest of the series was really a load of tosh in hindsight, nothing really memorable about it.

I'm not saying that it shouldn't have happened but it was just so detached from the first run in a few regards that, well, it sealed its own fate really. Or maybe I just grew up instead. Still at least it launched Daniel Clark's acting career so some good came out of it after all :¬D
  • neiljones1981
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • Permalink

Not Quite Orwell, but Insightful Comment on Media's Transformation of Society

  • hawked-off
  • Jan 1, 2017
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.