La ligne du diable II

The possessing 976-EVIL phone line is back. This time, murderer Teacher must finish what he started.. whatever it is.

With visions, astral projection, a helpful out-of-town biker "romance" and more.. or less.

Sadly, this isn't gory or interesting enough to be something worth recommending. There's basically no plot aside from the crazy teacher killing people and being weirdly in love with the main actress. But nothing he does or happens further his agenda in that direction. So it feels very underwritten. Yet the ending wasn't at all what I expected, which was a nice surprise.

Debbie James is quite a charming actress, and it has more than a few very interesting visual effects and ideas. So it is not a total loss.

976-Evil 2 (1991) is a far better film than the first movie. The film-makers didn't try to be serious with the subject matter and the players seem to be enjoying themselves. Shot on the cheap, the sequel follows Spike and his attempts to stop the evil behind that darn 976-EVIL. He's still tooling around on his motorcycle looking like a rebel without a clue. But this time around he has one. It's up to him to stop the madness. A little worse for wear (Spike's sporting a five o'clock shadow that comes and goes) but he's all clad in black leather and looking to kick some demonic butt!

Like I said, a very entertaining movie. Unlike the first film the black humor works. The villain in this movie is real creepy and funny as well. The film's direction flows along at a reasonable pace (thanks to the ever reliable Jim Wynorski) and the blood flows. I'm glad they stopped after this one. I probably couldn't take another sequel.

Recommended.

B

x

This is a Darn Good Movie that I Would have never Expected to be so Good. I first got Interested in the Series upon Learning that the Guy who Plays the Infamous "Freddy" Directed Part One. I Was looking to rent the Original, but could only found the Sequel, and was left with no other Choice. I didn't Expect Much, and got much more than I Would have ever Thought.

What Makes this Movie such a Masterpiece is really hard to put into Words. I would say it is mostly the Originality and the Obvious effort put into the Script to try to do the best with a VERY low budget. In Addition; Very good Acting, Good Video and Sound Quality, Good Murders, and a Remarkable Sense of Suspense.

Why would someone Not like this movie? They lack a sense of love for Horror Movies and/or Put this Movie in with a bad Attitude (If you Say You'll Hate this Movie, you most Likely will). I can also say that This Movie is for a Certain group that not everyone is in, and other user comments prove this! Reading the Plot Summary and Viewing the Trailer should really help you Decide before renting.

I give this Film 10 out of 10.

People who enjoyed this movie might like: Puppet Master, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Friday the 13th, Child's Play, Scream 2, The Dead Next Door, Bloody Murder, Phantasm, The Dead hate the Living, Castle Freak, Bad Channels, House and Haunted Hill, and I Know what you did last summer. For more Recommendations, Check the other Movies I Have commented on by Clicking on my Name above this Comment Section.

I believe, we did not. The first part of this movie was far not very good (What do you expect of a film directed by Freddy Krueger?). But this is one of the worst horror movies I have ever seen. Rene Assa (Who is this?) gives the worst performance of a college chief, who fell in love with one of his pupils, then he started dialing this number 976-EVIL, and than started performing assorted Omen-like murders. This poor girl (pupil) stands his evil powers with (guess who?) Spike, an annoying biker who participated in the first part too. Special F/X are poor, the acting is horrible, directing by Jim Wynorski (that genius whose mind brought us "Ghoulies IV" a movie which is in no way better). I didn't see any point in the script, it seems to rely solely on cheap special effects and some disgusting dead scenes. This movie sucks!

Horror sequels are a curious breed. Often, they struggle to capture the essence of what made their predecessors successful, or they amplify the wrong elements in a misguided attempt to outdo the original. "976-Evil II" (1991) is one such film-a movie that exists in the shadow of its predecessor but ends up being a fascinatingly chaotic and campy ride. Directed by Jim Wynorski, a prolific filmmaker known for his exploitation films, this sequel dials into a horror subgenre that revels in its own absurdity, delivering a mixed bag of supernatural thrills, low-budget effects, and unintentional comedy.

Plot Overview

"976-Evil II" follows the cursed phone line concept from the original film but takes it in an entirely different, and somewhat nonsensical, direction. The story centers around Robin (Debbie James), a college student who starts experiencing terrifying visions after answering a call from the demonic hotline. Enter Grubeck (Rene Assa), a sadistic college dean who gains the ability to astral project and commit murders thanks to the satanic power of the 976-evil hotline. As Robin teams up with Spike (Patrick O'Bryan), a returning character from the first film, they must confront Grubeck's ghostly rampage before he completes his sinister plans.

Aesthetics and Direction: Wynorski's direction is a testament to the "more is more" philosophy that dominated low-budget horror in the early 90s. The film is a hodgepodge of horror tropes, from possession and slasher elements to outlandish supernatural occurrences. The effects are a particular highlight (or lowlight, depending on your perspective)-with Grubeck's ability to astral project leading to a series of bizarre death scenes that feel more like a fever dream than a cohesive narrative.

One particularly memorable scene involves a victim being trapped inside a television, forced to live through a warped version of "It's a Wonderful Life" that ends in her brutal demise. It's moments like these where the film's absurdity reaches a peak, offering a glimpse into the kind of surreal horror that can only come from a director unafraid to push the boundaries of good taste.

Visually, "976-Evil II" is drenched in neon lighting, fog machines, and quick cuts, creating a disorienting atmosphere that mirrors the disjointed nature of the plot.

**Performances:** The acting in "976-Evil II" is a mixed bag, with some performances adding to the film's campy charm while others fall flat. Rene Assa as Grubeck chews the scenery with relish, delivering lines with a menacing glee that makes his character's descent into madness all the more entertaining. His performance is one of the film's saving graces, providing a villain who is both ridiculous and genuinely unsettling.

Debbie James, as the film's final girl, brings a certain vulnerability to Robin, though her character is often overshadowed by the over-the-top events surrounding her. Patrick O'Bryan reprises his role as Spike, but his character feels more like a plot device than a fully fleshed-out protagonist. He's the link to the original film, yet he spends most of the movie reacting to the insanity around him rather than driving the plot forward.

The tone is where the movie truly sets itself apart from its predecessor. While the original "976-Evil" (1988), directed by Robert Englund of Freddy Krueger fame, had a darker and more serious approach to its horror, the sequel veers into outright camp. This shift in tone makes "976-Evil II" feel less like a continuation and more like a parody of the original. The film's blend of horror and humor doesn't always work, leading to moments that are more confusing than scary. However, for fans of B-movies, this tonal inconsistency can be part of the film's appeal.

Cultural Impact and Legacy: In the grand scheme of horror cinema, "976-Evil II" is a footnote-an oddity that's more likely to be found in a midnight movie marathon than in any serious discussion of the genre. Yet, it's precisely this obscurity that gives the film its cult status. Like many low-budget horror sequels of its time, "976-Evil II" appeals to a niche audience who revel in its absurdity, its flaws, and its unapologetic embrace of the ridiculous.

The film also serves as a reminder of the creative risks taken by directors like Wynorski, who were willing to push the boundaries of what horror could be, even if the results were often more laughable than terrifying. In a way, "976-Evil II" is a celebration of the excesses of early 90s horror, a time when filmmakers were experimenting with new ideas, technologies, and ways to shock audiences-no matter how bizarre the outcome.

Conclusion: "976-Evil II" is not a good film by traditional standards. It's poorly paced, questionably acted, and the plot is a disjointed mess. But that's exactly what makes it such a fascinating watch. For fans of schlocky, so-bad-it's-good cinema, this sequel offers a treasure trove of outrageous moments and unintentional comedy that's hard to find in today's more polished horror fare.

If you're looking for a coherent, genuinely scary movie, "976-Evil II" will disappoint. But if you're in the mood for a surreal, campy trip through the wild world of early 90s horror, this film might just be your perfect midnight dial-in. Whether you love it or hate it, "976-Evil II" is a film that demands to be seen-if only to be believed.