Daughter of Darkness

I recently bought this film for my girlfriend who had fond memories of watching it as a teenager. Being a made for TV film it does have some rather low production values, and some of the scripting is a little wooden.

However, there is no denying that it has a certain atmosphere that you don't find in many films. Perhaps it had something to do with the location (the bulk of the film is set within Bucharest in Romania) or perhaps it is the combination of the set and the subject matter.

Whatever the cause, the dreamy, sinister atmosphere of the film does make it worth watching...so long as you don't expect too much from it.

If you like vampire films and haven't watched this yet then I can recommend it, a good film also for anyone wanting to catch a flavour of Eastern Europe and some of Romania's seedy little area's.

A disappointing addition to the vampire film which definitely lacks bite when dealing with its subject - now, this may not be surprising considering the TV-movie format, but it is a bit of a surprise when the director is none other than Stuart Gordon, the gentleman renowned for his two on-the-edge additions to 1980s horror cinema, RE-ANIMATOR and FROM BEYOND. Gordon here displays little of the vitality or skill he brought to his most famous movies and instead acts like more of a journeyman director, happy to pick up his paycheque with minimal effort. Not that the film is entirely bad - sure, the Romanian setting is nice and there are some arty tracking shots and good cinematography to give the movie a Euro feel. But the script is mundane and the story, which starts off so well, soon falls by the wayside.

The first hour of the film consists of the plot set-up, with nothing being explained too fully. Thus, we have a sense of mystery and a fairly close realism building up a little tension here and there. Unfortunately once the major plot twist is revealed and the vampires come to light (as it were), the film falls to pieces and becomes yet another clichéd bad guys vs. good guys fight to the finish, displaying little in the way of logic or surprises. The effects are minimal and the vampires largely lacking in interest, a typically boring group of Gothic types. The only difference is that they suck blood through their tongues rather than with fangs, although why exactly the lore was rewritten is unexplained as it isn't used for anything other than novelty value. The violence is mostly offscreen and the only thing to recommend in the film are some fairly good makeups used for the finale.

Acting wise, there are no great surprises here and nothing to make you sit up in your seat. Mia Sara (LEGEND) portrays yet another young, fragile heroine in a matter-of-fact way and her acting is neither particularly good or particularly bad, just so-so. It is good to see Anthony Perkins (EDGE OF SANITY) employing another of his sinister characters - complete with black eyeliner - but he seems mostly wasted in an ambivalent part. Robert Reynolds is forgettable and uninteresting as the evil vampire villain, although Dezso Garas is surprisingly good as the kind-hearted taxi driver with a dark secret. DAUGHTER OF DARKNESS is only worth watching if it's a quiet night and you're looking for some easy viewing before you go to bed.

One does not ask a lot of this kind of film, but this film failed to provide even a little for me...

The characters felt (to put it kindly) unreal even for a horror film! I never felt scared at all during the entire movie, and the choice of music made me want to sue for emotional suffering...

Ah, TV movies. There are some surprisingly great ones in the world amid many lackluster brethren, but either way they earned a definite reputation over time thanks to a long, predominant history of mixed bags, to say nothing of regular fare from the likes of the Sci-Fi Channel (now SyFy) and Lifetime. The production values in 'Daughter of darkness' show its roots and its age, and the film also comes off as astoundingly direct, even more than we usually expect of television features. This isn't to say it can't be worthwhile, but the company it keeps is as notable as its primary stars. Recognizing no small measure of ham-handedness accompanying the straightforward slant, I'm still think this is pretty fun - only, perhaps less than essential.

It needs to be said that plot development is almost painfully swift, and constructed with a logic that is pure Movie Magic. Every Romanian that protagonist Katherine meets happens to speak English; the U. S. ambassador is unbelievably accessible; every person Katherine speaks to, even random passers-by, are bewilderingly willing to listen and help. Some of this has meaningful (and predictable) basis in the narrative, and none of it is out of the ordinary for the medium, yet the incidence is never not striking. Given the nature of 'Daughter of darkness' as suggested, the cast have certain limits on what they're able to accomplish, not least as enthusiastic editing joins with the forthright angle of the TV-approved writing and direction to maintain a brisk pace and chop scenes up into relatively minute snippets. Alongside that momentum, the movie oscillates all too quickly between tones as the plot progresses. And to that point, while the flavor of filmmaker Stuart Gordon and his collaborators is seen in the swell effects, dream sequences, the most gnarly character designs, and other active genre elements, it's safe to say this is a far cry from the likes of 'Re-animator' and 'From beyond,' and one wonders how Gordon became involved with the production.

There are plentiful reasonable hang-ups one should have about this picture, to be sure - including the fact that to achieve their goals, all the antagonists would have had to do was bide their time and play nice, and a major aspect of the protagonist's character doesn't come into play until the climax. Just because it's flawed doesn't mean it's not entertaining, though, or (modestly) deserving. While overly curt, and overcooked, on paper the narrative is engaging, and compelling; would that it had more opportunity to manifest, breathe, and resolve of its own accord. The ensemble make the most of what they have to work with: Mia Sara is a fine leading lady, for example, and Dezso Garas is an unlikely highlight as he realizes cab driver Max with delightful personality. Just as Hungary is a fine stand-in for Romania with choice filming locations, the production design and art direction are commendable. The costume design is maybe a little curious, but excellent on the face of it, as well as hair and makeup work. Even though I disagree with some of the choices made, or think they don't come off entirely well, at large 'Daughter of darkness' is well made from a technical standpoint.

This isn't outright bad, not by any means. It is, however, defined by those same problems that we see as common to made-for-TV movies. Plain-faced, gauche, and rushed, 'Daughter of darkness' sometimes rides a line of testing suspension of disbelief just on account of those faults. Even so, it wants only to tell a tale of supernatural horror, and is solid enough as it does so. More mindful care outside the restrictions of small screen production would have gone a long way to change the end result of what this represents, but it's nevertheless enjoyable in its own right. This 1990 feature may not be especially remarkable, and there's no need to go out of your way for it - but if you happen to come across 'Daughter of darkness,' it's not a bad way to spend 90 minutes.

It's been many years since I've seen this movie. I would love to watch it again. It's good for anyone who likes the Vampire lore. The acting is pretty good, and Mia Sara and Anthony Perkins are great! This movie shows another side to vampires.