At a museum in Mexico City arrives a perfectly preserved mummy. It is a vampire that died years ago and who returns to life in search of his lost love Angelique. Unfortunately for him, the y... Read allAt a museum in Mexico City arrives a perfectly preserved mummy. It is a vampire that died years ago and who returns to life in search of his lost love Angelique. Unfortunately for him, the young woman has met and fallen in love with a doctor who supplies her with the blood she ne... Read allAt a museum in Mexico City arrives a perfectly preserved mummy. It is a vampire that died years ago and who returns to life in search of his lost love Angelique. Unfortunately for him, the young woman has met and fallen in love with a doctor who supplies her with the blood she needs to resist the vampire attacks.
- Man in Bar
- (as Gerardo Moreno)
- Policeman
- (as Carlos Gonzalez)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaA TV movie made for the USA network.
The pacing is weirdly soft, often to the point that it feels like the playback speed was reduced by ten percent or so. That pacing sometimes impacts the comedic timing in turn, or falsely heightens Cross' monologuing as Vlad into chewing of scenery; alternatively, some moments are boisterous or silly to an extent that feels out of character with what is otherwise a weirdly soft tone. Case in point, for as clever as the mix of horror and comedy is here, the movie took about forty-five minutes (nearly half the runtime) to earn its first laugh. In a similar manner, where the picture embraces abject horror vibes (the first time especially), something feels indescribably off; it's not just that Taplitz has difficulty bringing the horror to bear, but also that the fundamental arrangement of elements - camera, makeup, lighting, music, acting - is swirled together incongruously. Fine as Szarabajka is generally his acting is also the least consistent; I adore d'Abo, but she struggles somewhat to make the monstrous side of Angelique more than just a caricature. And there are some scenes, particularly in the back end, where tonal issues culminate in a slurry of the two composite genres that can't seem to figure out at all what it wanted to be in the moment.
The practical effects and special makeup are outstanding, and the sets; I appreciate Dana Kaproff's original music that complements the gently shifting mood. There are select times when Taplitz's direction, Peter Fernberger's cinematography, and every other element comes together for a shot of brilliance, and I'm stunned at how great it all looks for a brief moment. I'll note that it's a minor joy to see Glenn Shadix here (Otto in 'Beetlejuice'), and I wish he had a bigger part. By and large I think this is enjoyable, with a lot of points in its favor including the root ideas for the plot and scenes, and the cast. It's so regrettable that 'Nightlife' very distinctly has trouble discovering its ideal form, and for as earnestly as everyone tries, nothing comes out quite right. The comedy is rarely more than lightly amusing; the horror never strikes with the potency we'd hope, and the balance between the two facets comes across as kind of cockeyed, like a framed photo that never hangs on the wall the way it's supposed to. It's worth checking out on its own merits, and it's definitely suggested most highly for those who are fans of d'Abo, Cross, or someone else involved. It's difficult to give a more robust recommendation, though, for as sadly middling as the end result is. It's evident all on hand had fun making it, and I'm glad for those who get more out of 'Nightlife' than I do; I wish I could feel the same way.
- I_Ailurophile
- Dec 27, 2023
- Permalink