Cruel, and utterly effective, Peter Foldes' experimentation with computer animation employs a bold speechless narrative to draw attention to the grave effects of consumerism. Who needs ethic... Read allCruel, and utterly effective, Peter Foldes' experimentation with computer animation employs a bold speechless narrative to draw attention to the grave effects of consumerism. Who needs ethics when everything is within arm's reach?Cruel, and utterly effective, Peter Foldes' experimentation with computer animation employs a bold speechless narrative to draw attention to the grave effects of consumerism. Who needs ethics when everything is within arm's reach?
- Director
- Nominated for 1 Oscar
- 2 wins & 2 nominations total
Featured reviews
I see I took this film a little bit more light-hearted than some of the other reviewers it seems. I used to always to see this movie in the tv guide on the Starz Encore network. I always wanted to watch it because I was just so curious about what this film was but I never could watch it because it always aired only on sundays at 5 am, it was always that day and time. Finally curiousity drove me so insane I *gasp* tried to figure out how to program my vcr, when I failed miserably I just started taping at 3 am and hoped for the best. I didn't get to watch what I had taped until I got home from school the next day and boy was it worth pretty much wasting a blank tape! This film totally blew my mind, I've always loved those weird indy foreign cartoons, especially the 70's ones. This movie not only had some of the most visually pleasing effects, it also had some of the best music I've ever heard. The overall tone of the film did seem to be an attempt to point out how wrong and selfish gluttony is and that last scene pretty much showed just how wrong he thought it really is, but the music, effects, and overall mood and atmosphere the film puts you in is too amazing and totally drowns out whatever political message this creator wanted to get out. Even the simplest things in this film, like the chewing and walking scenes just totally blow you away and burn in your memory for life. This is an all around wonderful film, a must see for any animation fan.
This short, produced by the National Film Board of Canada, was nominated for an Academy Award. Once you've seen it, you'll see why. Not easily forgotten, although you may wish to. The choice of animation styles was made, I suspect, deliberately, in order to keep viewers off-balance. It's a perfect choice. A thought-provoking, extremely unsettling look at hunger in many forms. If you are easily disturbed or offended, this probably isn't for you. Otherwise, highly recommended.
I wasn't sure until the end if this might not have been better called 'Appetite". It's a very early computer generated animation that depicts just how easy it makes it for us, as human beings, to embrace a convenience society in which all sense of proportion is compromised. The imagery here isn't my favourite style of presentation, but as we see the original character morph into the end product, it's about as allegorical as you can get to the expansion of a societal need to take, and to take more and then to keep on taking - at the expense of ourselves and others or both. It becomes a grotesque travesty of humanity or perhaps a validation of what we want from it? There's something almost Dickensian about the conclusion and it's quite a thought provoking ten minutes that fifty years on might prove a little more providential than any of us might like!
10kamerad
I just have to express my love for this film. When we look at most computer animated films, even non animation buffs can tell you that what you are looking at has been generated by computer. Not so with "Hunger". There is none of that plastic shine usually associated with computer animation, and the images are two-dimensional. It looks at first like regular animation, but strange things happen. There is a moment right at the end that is one of the creepiest things I've ever seen in film. When the innocent looking children suddenly grow huge fangs and devour our "hero", we can see early uses of "morphing". True it is nowhere as smooth as later examples, but I think in Hunger's case, it works beautifully. The "primitiveness" of the film only adds to its effect. The way the lines break apart and form new ones is crude, yes, but at the some time it looks almost as if the drawing have a life of their own. They move with a strange fluidity. Of course another reason I love the film is simply because it is very profound and is addressing issues that are usually ignored in computer animation in favor of fancy tricks
There are many experiments in the history of computer animation that either age phenomenally well or poorly. One of the better ones to show the endless possibilities of the medium is Peter Foldes' Hunger, all the way back from 1974.
Made as a satirical fable on the consequences of greed and gluttony, the film is essentially an entire rise and fall story of a simple man. Given that the whole film is told through metaphorical images without any lines of dialogue, it allows the viewers to fill in the blanks themselves. That being said, the grotesque character designs and props give off the ugliness of the real world so well that we can definitely relate to it, art or otherwise. The amount of different formations Foldes and the crew get to play with in bulging this man from skinny to obese never stops, and the key frame process they used back then allows for a frighteningly smooth flow from one shot to the next.
However, for all of the film's intents, the one thing that may be a make or break for some viewers is the music. While the modernized 70s experimental score does fit the tone pretty well, it might be a little too horrific for some people, and it's easy to see why this haunted so many animation fans for years, especially from Canada. Also, perhaps the pacing does get a little dragged out at points, and it does take a while for some of the film's messages to finally come across.
That being said, the film is made for the arthouse crowd, so it's still worth checking out for curiosity sake. As a social commentary, Hunter is quite surreal, but as an experimental piece of art, it's even better.
Made as a satirical fable on the consequences of greed and gluttony, the film is essentially an entire rise and fall story of a simple man. Given that the whole film is told through metaphorical images without any lines of dialogue, it allows the viewers to fill in the blanks themselves. That being said, the grotesque character designs and props give off the ugliness of the real world so well that we can definitely relate to it, art or otherwise. The amount of different formations Foldes and the crew get to play with in bulging this man from skinny to obese never stops, and the key frame process they used back then allows for a frighteningly smooth flow from one shot to the next.
However, for all of the film's intents, the one thing that may be a make or break for some viewers is the music. While the modernized 70s experimental score does fit the tone pretty well, it might be a little too horrific for some people, and it's easy to see why this haunted so many animation fans for years, especially from Canada. Also, perhaps the pacing does get a little dragged out at points, and it does take a while for some of the film's messages to finally come across.
That being said, the film is made for the arthouse crowd, so it's still worth checking out for curiosity sake. As a social commentary, Hunter is quite surreal, but as an experimental piece of art, it's even better.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is the first computer-animated film to be nominated for an Academy Award.
- ConnectionsEdited into International Festival of Animation (1977)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Голод
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content