Matilda

The main problem as I see with Matilda is that there is no sense of enchantment in what is clearly a most improbable tale. The film would have to be handled that way for any chance of success.

Matilda is a tale written in the 30s by Paul Gallico updated for the current 70s times. In it Clive Revill who is the only one in the cast to sense that this should be a fantasy in his performance tells the tale of how he came to America from Great Britain with a trained boxing kangaroo. The beast has a punch like Dempsey and no one can stand up to him.

Elliott Gould who sees possibilities here as an animal act agrees to be their agent. One night the real heavyweight champion who's had a few steps in the ring. Larry Pennell gets nailed and goes down for the count. The act is made.

It's also not pleasing to mobster Harry Guardino who controls Pennell. The best scenes in the film are some of his inept hitmen trying to carry out a contract on a kangaroo. Things are most pleasing to sportswriter Robert Mitchum who wants to take Guardino down.

In Lee Server's book on Robert Mitchum, actor/stuntman Gary Morgan who got into the kangaroo suit to play Matilda said that the producers actually tried to convince critics this was a real kangaroo. The littlest kid out there could see that wasn't the case and they roasted the film.

It sure didn't help trying to put over a lie like that. But there's more to it. I think that it might have worked with some special effects and an animated Matilda. Even with that though Matilda still would have had a long way to go to succeed as fantasy.

This film is bad, yes, but had the producers used a REAL KANGAROO, it would have killed the actor it was boxing with. I am an Australian and I have seen two seven foot tall male 'Roos fighting each other, it is not a pretty sight as the object is for one or the other to kill it's opponent,(this is there way of securing the herd of females) and there are incidents where someone has boxed a kangaroo, and been injured or killed, so when you see a kangaroo on TV or Film it is likely to be a female, or Animated, as it is a good idea not to injure actors (they might be annoyed at losing the ability to breath). There is a strange idea that Australian animals are cute and cuddly, that is false, many are dangerous (10 of the 12 most deadliest snakes live here)and most are just plain ugly (Koalas are as soft as steal wool). So if you come to Australia BE CAREFULL!!!

My brother took me to this back in the 70s, and I loved it. And only recently found it again. No, it's not Citizen Kane or Vertigo, but it is a fun little story similar to Gus the Kicking Mule and The Cat from Outer Space (which is the best of those cheap but fun Disney movies of that era). This is a fun, cute and very silly movie that actually has good acting and a very bad faked Kangaroo. If it's snowing on a Saturday or you are in lockdown, it's a fun romp to watch with the kids.

This film's problems are numerous and in your face from the get-go. Start with the ridiculous toupee worn by the British former champion who owns Matilda, the boxing kangaroo. Matilda is a guy in a fur suit. He looks less like a real kangaroo than I look like a blue whale. The script and dialogue are pure garbage. But Elliot Gould, who had just done Nashville, The Long Goodbye and A Bridge Too Far and was still considered a star, read the script and thought it was fine, which shows how bad his judgment was. This was the beginning of the end for his career, which was probably inevitable since he was always a talentless hack anyway. To say Gould embarrasses himself here would be an understatement.

I suppose this was intended as a kid's film, but I saw it when I was about 8 years old and I hated it then too. What a piece of crap.

There are many, many examples of wonderful classic Hollywood actors appearing in films that are total garbage....and you wonder why Clark Gable would star in "Parnell" or Gene Kelly in "Xanadu" or Cary Grant in "It All Came True". I don't know if they had agents who were out of their minds or the studios were holding loved ones captive in order to force the actors to make these dreck films...but in yet another example, somehow Robert Mitchum starred in "Matilda"...and you wonder WHY!

"Matilda" is the story of a boxing kangaroo...and this one dons boxing gloves and boxes people! Does this sound ludicrous? Of course! And, when you think about it, so was seeing Francis the Talking Mule playing football or Mr. Ed trying out for the L.A. Dodgers....but they really DID make these movies no matter how ludicrous the premises would seem!

When the story begins, an ex-boxer brings Bernie Bonnelli (Elliot Gould) his boxing kangaroo, Matilda, to meet him. Bernie is shocked that the animal can box and he teams up with a sports writer (Robert Mitchum) to sell the public on the boxing beast. Unfortunately for Bernie, the kangaroo knocks out a top boxer who is owned by the Mob...and they vow to get revenge. In addition to these folks, Ms. Smith is an animal rights advocate and she vows to stop the animal from entering the ring.

The way that Elliot Gould deals with the animal rights activist is just amazing....both stupid AND incredibly sexist. When she's in her hotel room showering, he breaks in to see her. When she comes out in a robe, he makes a few sexist remarks and grabs her...kissing her very soundly. Suddenly, she's under his spell and remains so throughout the film!! Talk about stupid and offensive!!! This is exactly the sort of writing you see through the movie--terrible beyond belief though the actors seem to try their best with an utterly ridiculous plot and less believable dialog.

But it's not all about stupid writing. The movie also suffers horribly from the Matilda costume. Obviously there's some guy inside the suit...and the creature is one of the creepiest animals I've ever seen in a movie. It's MORE creepy than the creatures in "Cats" or the title character in "Sonic the Hedgehog", that's for sure!

So is there any reason to see this? Well, if you like seeing actors like Gould and Mitchum committing career suicide, then by all means watch it! And, if you are a bad movie buff, it's also worth seeing. Otherwise....steer clear, as it's junk...and that's being charitable!!