Le justicier de l'Arizona

Miss Mexico at only 16 years old? Why hasn't this been brought up? Maybe no Oscars, but we'll worth mentioning...😊

Apparently Metro Goldwyn Mayer, while giving the movie a theatrical release overseas, sent this western directly to television in North America. It's pretty easy to see why MGM wasn't totally confident that the movie would attract domestic audiences. The script is the main problem. The story is made up of many elements and plot turns you will have seen in countless westerns before; I bet even audiences in 1967 found the story clichéd. Not only that, the script insults the audience by taking more than half of the movie to set everything up; there's no reason why it should have taken so long for this creaky story to define everything. Also, that first half of the movie is pretty dull, with almost no action or anything else that might be considered lively. The second half of the movie is a bit more energetic, but it's too little and too late. Why the present owners of the movie thought it was worth a DVD release through their on demand video line, I cannot say.

This film begins with a young woman named "Anisa Domingo" (Ana Martin) witnessing the cold-blooded murder of her parents by a ruthless rancher by the name of "Clay Sutton" (Lyle Bettger) and his henchmen. Not knowing what else to do, she seeks help from an old family friend named "Ben Wyatt" (Robert Taylor), who has a reputation for being an extremely fast gunfighter. Given that Anisa's father saved his life during the Mexican Rebellion, Ben feels obligated to help her find those responsible and bring them to justice. The main problem, however, is the fact that the local town marshal, "Will Parker" (Mort Mills), is working for Clay Sutton and doesn't particularly care for Ben Wyatt anyway. Complicating matters even further is the fact that an aspiring gunman named "Lee Sutton" (Chad Everett) has developed an attachment to Anisa, but considering that Clay Sutton is his brother, things may become even more difficult for all concerned. Now, rather than revealing more, I'll just say that, although it had a fairly standard Western feel, this was still an enjoyable movie, largely due to the strong performance by Robert Taylor. Similarly, I also liked the performance of John Davis Chandler as the gunfighter "Sundance" as well. On the other hand, I must admit that I thought Chad Everett was miscast in his role and, along with the rather formulaic plot, I found it difficult to rate this movie any higher than I have. Slightly above average.

Robert Taylor aged more strangely than any of the stars. From the beautiful young man that ravished Garbo in "Camille", he emerged from World War 2 ravished himself. I don't know a lot about him, but I suspect his war experiences had a major emotional effect on him that really showed in his face. Not only did he look worn, he also became far more interesting as an actor. Here he is 56, in the last two years of his life, and his craggy face and striking blue eyes portray a world-weariness that carries tragic weight. He is that often seen Western character, the famous gunfighter tired of killing. I believe Clint Eastwood must have based his character in "Unforgiven" on Taylor's performance here. Taylor makes this fairly ordinary Western extraordinary.

Obviously a former TV product but eventually put on the big screen, as were DUEL and THE KILLERS (1964), because above average stuff. This typical early sixties western seems to belong to those which were some kind of transition between the John Ford and Han Hathaway era ( forties and fifties) and the new age, the Sam Pecinpah's or Monte Hellman's ones), and not like the Andrew McLaglen's films, made in the sixties and early seventies, and still in the fifties atmosphere. So, this very one could be compared to THE LAST CHALLENGE, with also Chad Everett and co starring this time Glenn Ford, also for MGM, another plot showing the end of the old west and old timers, but in a more interesting and bitter, darker way than this one. Here, Chad Everett is somewhere also the lead character's "sidekick ", but I expected more. That's my own opinion folks, that remains a good western, made by a director who, after a goood start - NIGHT PASSAGE - lost his way thru Disney garbage stuff, before resuming with this one.