IMDb RATING
6.7/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
A girl named Alice falls down a rabbit-hole and wanders into the strange Wonderland.A girl named Alice falls down a rabbit-hole and wanders into the strange Wonderland.A girl named Alice falls down a rabbit-hole and wanders into the strange Wonderland.
Jo Maxwell Muller
- Alice's Sister
- (as Jo Maxwell-Muller)
Michael Redgrave
- Caterpillar
- (as Sir Michael Redgrave)
Anthony Trent
- Fish Footman
- (as Tony Trent)
- …
Wilfrid Lawson
- Dormouse
- (as Wilfred Lawson)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured review
Probably will remain in my top 3 Alice in Wonderland film adaptations (it only covers the first book), just below Svankmajer's wonderfully surreal stop-motion version, titled Alice, and I'm somewhat ambivalent about whether I prefer the Disney version or not-it's nicely colored and the characters are more similar to the drawings In Carroll's book, but it has the goofiness of a Disney film, of course. This adaptation is quite faithful to the original book, though a few scenarios might have been removed for time or were altered in some way, but most of the dialogue remains the same.
I was expecting it to feel more like a big studio production, and while the production values were quite good, it's not reminiscent of a Hollywood film or the British equivalent. It has the aura of a B&W art film-and the girl playing Alice (makes me think of a French New Wave heroine), who never smiles, often scowls, is rather sullen, often avoids eye contact or talks while not even looking at the character she's speaking to, and is clearly older than 7 (I believe that was the stated age of Alice in the book). Though she's a bit sassy in the book and not a push over or anything, her behavior seems altered quite a bit based off my, admittedly somewhat time-eroded, memories of Alice and Wonderland. The other change is, while the film is quite faithful in terms of the scenes adapted, the actors are all humans with no attempts to dress them up as the curious assortment of talking animals, odd creatures, and flat card-like men and women found in the book.
The choice of sitar music, with occasional accompaniment, by Ravi Shankar (and someone else I hadn't heard of on oboe) was an interesting and surprisingly fitting choice. I always imagined Canterbury prog or some old folk music with flutes.
In some sense I think it has a more dream-like continuity than the book, because the whimsical passages of Carroll lend's the novel a more structured and deliberate quality, compared to the way the scenes flow and our edited in this version.
I was expecting it to feel more like a big studio production, and while the production values were quite good, it's not reminiscent of a Hollywood film or the British equivalent. It has the aura of a B&W art film-and the girl playing Alice (makes me think of a French New Wave heroine), who never smiles, often scowls, is rather sullen, often avoids eye contact or talks while not even looking at the character she's speaking to, and is clearly older than 7 (I believe that was the stated age of Alice in the book). Though she's a bit sassy in the book and not a push over or anything, her behavior seems altered quite a bit based off my, admittedly somewhat time-eroded, memories of Alice and Wonderland. The other change is, while the film is quite faithful in terms of the scenes adapted, the actors are all humans with no attempts to dress them up as the curious assortment of talking animals, odd creatures, and flat card-like men and women found in the book.
The choice of sitar music, with occasional accompaniment, by Ravi Shankar (and someone else I hadn't heard of on oboe) was an interesting and surprisingly fitting choice. I always imagined Canterbury prog or some old folk music with flutes.
In some sense I think it has a more dream-like continuity than the book, because the whimsical passages of Carroll lend's the novel a more structured and deliberate quality, compared to the way the scenes flow and our edited in this version.
- CantileverCaribou
- Feb 27, 2018
- Permalink
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaWriter, Producer, and Director Jonathan Miller explained that the reason that none of the actors or actresses (even those playing non-human characters) wore costumes aside from Victorian period dress, was that he thought it was ridiculous to get big name stars to play parts (as he did in this movie and MGM had done in Alice au pays des merveilles (1933)) and then cover them up in big costume animal heads so they were unrecognizable.
- GoofsIn the scenes with the Mock Turtle, his legs are crossed in all the long shots, but in close-up shots, his legs are in a completely different position; without there being enough time to have changed them from one shot and another.
- Crazy creditsThe "cast in order of appearance" is slightly incorrect. The cast lists the Mock Turtle (Sir John Gielgud), the Gryphon (Malcolm Muggeridge) and the Executioner (David Battley) in that order. In fact the Executioner appears first in the scenes with the King and Queen of Hearts, and then the Gryphon appears in order to take Alice to the Mock Turtle, who appears last.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Worlds of Fantasy: The Child Within (2008)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Alice Harikalar Diyarında
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 12 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content