Paul Lawrence is a working class man who dates Cara, sells shirts at a Sydney department store, and dreams of attending art school.Paul Lawrence is a working class man who dates Cara, sells shirts at a Sydney department store, and dreams of attending art school.Paul Lawrence is a working class man who dates Cara, sells shirts at a Sydney department store, and dreams of attending art school.
Sean Myers
- Paul Lawrence
- (as Sean McEuan)
Amber Rodgers
- Cara
- (as Julie Rodgers)
Elza Stenning
- Baroness Bronoski
- (as Elsa Jacoby)
John Rhall
- Blonde Waiter
- (uncredited)
Roger Ward
- Dancer at Party
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
'The Set' was made two years before Australian television led the world in its depiction of sex in the classic soap 'Number 96'. Clunky and clumsy though much of the film is, there is a freshness and immediacy about some of its scenes that is very taking. Hazel Phillips is the standout in a generally unexciting cast: she alone has the style and elegance to convince us that this is a genuinely 'groovy' set of people challenging the still stifling mores of Australia as it enters the 1970s. Although the film is regarded today, if at all, as an oddity, Hazel Phillips and a few of the other actors present a fascinatingly savvy commentary on a transitional period between prudery and permissiveness.
This is sort of an interesting movie, especially historically speaking: While it doesn't portray gay sex as it does heterosexual sex and the main character returns to heterosexuality at the end, that it does attempt to to portray a gay relationship does make it a ground-breaking movie and is worthy to watch for that alone.
However, there are numerous issues with the movie. The acting is decidedly low-key and the nudity seems to be in there just to attract interest from the straight crowd. There are also a couple of predatory gay characters.
Thus, if you're interested in the history of gay cinema, this is an interesting watch, but most people are better off just avoiding this movie.
However, there are numerous issues with the movie. The acting is decidedly low-key and the nudity seems to be in there just to attract interest from the straight crowd. There are also a couple of predatory gay characters.
Thus, if you're interested in the history of gay cinema, this is an interesting watch, but most people are better off just avoiding this movie.
I saw The Set on Easter Tuesday 1969 as a 14 year old with a couple of school friends. We went to the Star Theaterette in Melbourne Australia. It was the hottest film on at the time. After a 4-6 week season at The Trak cinema, The Set moved to The Star (a theaterette playing "adult" movies.... necessary after the introduction of TV took away the theatre's livelihood in running continuous sessions of newsreels & cartoons).....and that is where we watched, with wide eyes, the fast set of Sydney society vomit across the screen! My love for camp exploitation films was made!! The promise of nudity was what attracted us, especially that of of afternoon TV guru ,Hazel Phillips...but a combination of inept acting, bad writing, sleazy plot lines, protracted nude scenes, gay and straight love scenarios and most importantly promises of big city "adventures" waiting for us when we grew up that seared an irreplaceable place in our minds.
I can't be the only one...PLEASE~release this seminal Aussie introduction into camp/bad/inept/sexploitation/gay/soap opera cinema!!
I can't be the only one...PLEASE~release this seminal Aussie introduction into camp/bad/inept/sexploitation/gay/soap opera cinema!!
I wonder what "The Set" looks like now? I remember it vaguely and would be curious to see it again. It was pretty awful back in the seventies and strangely even a bit dated way back then. It was meant to be shocking. It was heavily promoted as having every sexual deviation imaginable, of course that was a time before the world finally worked out that being gay was just another life style choice. To be fair some of the actors are sexy and the movie as a whole was really no worse than a lot of other movies. The Set is a movie worthy of preservation. I wonder if we will ever see it again. I hope it has not been lost. Poor Sean M was an attractive actor and perhaps never lived this down, a bit unfair as he was not that bad. The script was a shocker.
What a schtinker.
Maybe back in the day, the film was shocking. Lots of bare boobies. One hairy chest A few bare bottoms.
As an historical gay themed film, it's interesting, but beyond that, it's pretty dull. The music and dancing look dated even for the Swingin' Seventies. The film has a lotta swinging going on, but for today's audience, it's more ho-hum than inflammatory.
The women's hairdos are interesting. Must have been a lot of VO-5 on the set.
The acting is on the lower end of so-so, and the cinematography was too. Movie makers have thankfully honed their skills since the making of The Set.
There are some really crude representations of the 'derelict lifestyle.' Like when Paul opens a can of beer for Tony, and tosses the tab from the can into the refrigerator. Tony just throws his on the floor. The ashtrays are humorously full of butts. Except for the ones on the floor around the fireplace.
The bathroom, however, is quite clean and tidy for a two-bachelor pad.
And then there are some quite mysterious scenes that could have been for another movie. Tony tossing a football around in the street with the neighborhood kids, and giving one of them a harmonica whose real significance fallen out of the script.
The whole film is an eye-roller. But maybe it's an interesting peek into the seventies for those who never experienced it.
Enjoy. But don't expect much. Though I suppose the intent was some sort of social redemption at the end, where ALMOST everyone is having a rollicking good time. .
Maybe back in the day, the film was shocking. Lots of bare boobies. One hairy chest A few bare bottoms.
As an historical gay themed film, it's interesting, but beyond that, it's pretty dull. The music and dancing look dated even for the Swingin' Seventies. The film has a lotta swinging going on, but for today's audience, it's more ho-hum than inflammatory.
The women's hairdos are interesting. Must have been a lot of VO-5 on the set.
The acting is on the lower end of so-so, and the cinematography was too. Movie makers have thankfully honed their skills since the making of The Set.
There are some really crude representations of the 'derelict lifestyle.' Like when Paul opens a can of beer for Tony, and tosses the tab from the can into the refrigerator. Tony just throws his on the floor. The ashtrays are humorously full of butts. Except for the ones on the floor around the fireplace.
The bathroom, however, is quite clean and tidy for a two-bachelor pad.
And then there are some quite mysterious scenes that could have been for another movie. Tony tossing a football around in the street with the neighborhood kids, and giving one of them a harmonica whose real significance fallen out of the script.
The whole film is an eye-roller. But maybe it's an interesting peek into the seventies for those who never experienced it.
Enjoy. But don't expect much. Though I suppose the intent was some sort of social redemption at the end, where ALMOST everyone is having a rollicking good time. .
Did you know
- TriviaOne three Australian feature films written by Australian actor Roger Ward who is more well known for acting than writing. They are [in order]: The Set (1970), Brothers (1982) and Flex Appeal (1984).
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Hidden History of Homosexual Australia (2005)
- SoundtracksThe Set (Unsophisticated Little Innocent)
Performed by The Flanagans
Written by Lolita Rivera and Sven Libaek
- How long is The Set?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 42 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content