13 reviews
This minor sci-fi thriller from the Gardner-Levy stable is typical of the breed:lots and lots of repetitious talk from a few stereotyped characters enmeshed in a predictable, well-used plot, strung together with a bit of stock footage, one or two days of location shooting in some uninteresting scrub-land, and a tiny slice of special effects work. And it's all filmed in a totally routine manner, using tedious close-up after close-up to enable a quick sale to TV.
Give all that, this entry is not too bad. In fact, after a slow start, it becomes moderately suspenseful. The director has contrived some atmosphere and tension, despite the constraints of his very moderate budget. The players, especially the attractive Miss Crowley, come across well (partly thanks to Jack MacKenzie's fine cinematography). And while the screenplay offers more than its fair share of standing-still dialogue, there's still just enough action to satisfy not-too-critical fans.
Give all that, this entry is not too bad. In fact, after a slow start, it becomes moderately suspenseful. The director has contrived some atmosphere and tension, despite the constraints of his very moderate budget. The players, especially the attractive Miss Crowley, come across well (partly thanks to Jack MacKenzie's fine cinematography). And while the screenplay offers more than its fair share of standing-still dialogue, there's still just enough action to satisfy not-too-critical fans.
- JohnHowardReid
- Nov 29, 2006
- Permalink
This was actually a well made movie with good production values, nice location filming and some good acting but it totally loses it's momentum in the script department. You will think you are watching a jungle exploration flick with a lot of bickering for most of the film. There a a few scattered special effects here and there but most of the 'action' takes place at the end with a very abrupt ending that demonstrates the poor scriptwork.
Not bad by any means but definitely a 'B minus' flick.
The are actually some other 50's sci-if you should see before this one: First Man into Space - Caltiki the Immortal Monster (goriest 50's sci-fi yet) - Space Master X-7(in widescreen 2:35 if you can find it!) - Night the World Exploded
Not bad by any means but definitely a 'B minus' flick.
The are actually some other 50's sci-if you should see before this one: First Man into Space - Caltiki the Immortal Monster (goriest 50's sci-fi yet) - Space Master X-7(in widescreen 2:35 if you can find it!) - Night the World Exploded
- captainapache
- Dec 13, 2005
- Permalink
This movie has virtually disappeared from the face of the Earth. Of those who saw it on late night TV in the 1960's, who can forget the look of terror frozen on the scientist who had been"absorbed" by the radioactive crystalline goo? You who are too young to remember, it will seem like nothing. But for those vintage enough to remember, that scene must be seared in the back of your eye sockets.
And how did a satellite crash through a jungle, skid hard enough to leave a scorched gouge, and then somehow wedge itself down into the bottom of a cave anyway?
You are in for a real treat. This classic can now be found on the Internet Archive (www.Archive.org). Please remember to tip your waitress . . .
https://archive.org/details/TheFlameBarrier1958_20170708
And how did a satellite crash through a jungle, skid hard enough to leave a scorched gouge, and then somehow wedge itself down into the bottom of a cave anyway?
You are in for a real treat. This classic can now be found on the Internet Archive (www.Archive.org). Please remember to tip your waitress . . .
https://archive.org/details/TheFlameBarrier1958_20170708
This film was first released in 1958 to fill the bottom half of a double bill with the much superior RETURN OF DRACULA. I have an original poster for this double bill hanging in my living room. I first saw this film as a kid on T.V. in the mid sixties. It was frequently shown on "Supernatural Theater." It was one of my favorites when I was a kid. However, viewing the film as an adult, without eyes dimmed by nostalgia, THE FLAME BARRIER is just what it is; a quickly made thriller to back up a much superior film to fill a "shock" double bill.
On the plus side: I will admit the film does have a few good shocks. One character suddenly burns to death and turns into a skeleton (for reasons that that are never adequately explained) and the shot of the dead scientist body embedded in protoplasmic mass are pretty effective. The cast is good and the direction involving enough that you forget half the film consists of the cast cutting through brush. However, the script has the feel of having been written very quickly. The film wraps up leaving the viewer with more loose ends than an old dish rag. When the explorers find the satellite and protoplasmic mass, they also find the monkey that was sent up in satellite still alive. Why did the protoplasmic mass not devour it or destroy it with its radiation when the monkey was in the satellite with it? As the previous reviewer here pointed out, this blob stays in one place and much of the plot depends on this. Yet, before the cast even encounters the blob, they encounter charred skeletons, a blood soaked Indian village, and then there is the Indian guide who was never near the blob encased satellite, who suffers from radiation burns and then mysteriously burns up down to a skeleton. Perhaps the satellite brought something else back with it that the adventurers didn't encounter? Perhaps more likely this film was rushed into production before the writers had time for a re-write to tie up all the loose ends.
On the plus side: I will admit the film does have a few good shocks. One character suddenly burns to death and turns into a skeleton (for reasons that that are never adequately explained) and the shot of the dead scientist body embedded in protoplasmic mass are pretty effective. The cast is good and the direction involving enough that you forget half the film consists of the cast cutting through brush. However, the script has the feel of having been written very quickly. The film wraps up leaving the viewer with more loose ends than an old dish rag. When the explorers find the satellite and protoplasmic mass, they also find the monkey that was sent up in satellite still alive. Why did the protoplasmic mass not devour it or destroy it with its radiation when the monkey was in the satellite with it? As the previous reviewer here pointed out, this blob stays in one place and much of the plot depends on this. Yet, before the cast even encounters the blob, they encounter charred skeletons, a blood soaked Indian village, and then there is the Indian guide who was never near the blob encased satellite, who suffers from radiation burns and then mysteriously burns up down to a skeleton. Perhaps the satellite brought something else back with it that the adventurers didn't encounter? Perhaps more likely this film was rushed into production before the writers had time for a re-write to tie up all the loose ends.
- youroldpaljim
- Nov 6, 2001
- Permalink
The search for a crashed satellite in the jungles of MesoAmerica finds instead a gelatinous existential threat from beyond "The Flame Barrier". The film opens with a nonsensical prologue that carefully explains how a rocket is going to attempt to penetrate the mysterious (and titular) flame barrier, which surrounds our planet at an altitude of 200 miles. The flame barrier is sci-fi pseudoscience at its worst but fortunately has nothing to do with the story and is never again mentioned. The film is a fusion of sound-set jungle adventure (the first ¾) and space monster in a cave sthick (1/4) and is surprisingly entertaining (consider its leaden pace, remarkably silly-looking monster and nearly incoherent plot). Considering the material they had to work with, the three leads (Arthur Franz, Kathleen Crowley, Robert Brown) are pretty good and there are some good lines "Excuse the cockroaches. Fortunately they don't bite...everything else does". As cheapie sci-fi horrors go, the pointlessly entitled "The Flame Barrier" is watchable and slightly memorable (especially the head sticking out of the blob). Crowley and Brown deserve credit for their casual and competent handling of the chimpanzee.
- jamesrupert2014
- Oct 12, 2019
- Permalink
Some time ago, a rocket ship hit the "flame barrier" at the edge of outer space. Now, Kathleen Crowley has shown up in Central America. She wants jungle guides Arthur Franz and his brother, Robert Brown, to take her into the jungle, where she hopes to find either her husband, or his corpse.
It's a fairly standard, cheap jungle picture, with people trying to look like Meso-American Indians instead of Black jungle natives, with a tinge of pseudo-scientific nonsense at the end. The script doesn't try to hard, although the performers are good, and there are one or two decent comedy put-downs early on. Miss Crowley, who appeared in several scifi movies at this point in her career, is an attractive blonde, with a voice a bit like Angie Dickinson.
The movie tries to gain from strength by its genre-crossing plot, but winds up simply looking like it has a really dumb monster plot tacked onto its end.
It's a fairly standard, cheap jungle picture, with people trying to look like Meso-American Indians instead of Black jungle natives, with a tinge of pseudo-scientific nonsense at the end. The script doesn't try to hard, although the performers are good, and there are one or two decent comedy put-downs early on. Miss Crowley, who appeared in several scifi movies at this point in her career, is an attractive blonde, with a voice a bit like Angie Dickinson.
The movie tries to gain from strength by its genre-crossing plot, but winds up simply looking like it has a really dumb monster plot tacked onto its end.
- hwg1957-102-265704
- Dec 17, 2022
- Permalink
- kevinolzak
- Apr 1, 2019
- Permalink
Like "Monster of Green Hell", much of this movie is taken up with a long African safari. The three principal characters argue, struggle and search mainly for a reason to continue. Natives provide it several times just as the party is ready to turn back. The acting is good and the continuing ambivalent relationship between the rich woman and the safari leader continues to warm up. There is no real special effects until they reach the location they sought after. The final scene is the only one that qualifies as science fiction. A good movie but light on science fiction.
- dstillman-89383
- May 15, 2019
- Permalink
- mark.waltz
- Jan 19, 2021
- Permalink
Blob movies became suddenly quite fashionable in the late fifties; this lesser-known entry offers a few unique twists. Unlike the slipping, sliding blobs of other films, this one doesn't move, apparently content to remain stationary while digesting its first two victims, a space ship and its single human occupant. It does, however, have the ability to project a forcefield which instantly disintegrates any would-be rescuers who come too close. Anyway, this film is professionally made and acted, and has its share of suspenseful sequences. And the image of the man encased in the protoplasm, his face frozen in an agonized silent scream, is a horrific one.
A satellite goes through THE FLAME BARRIER, causing it to crash into the jungles of Mexico. Carol Dahlmann (Kathleen Crowley) hires a man (Arthur Franz) and his brother to help her find her missing husband, who had gone searching for the fallen craft.
Setting out on their journey, the trio encounter many perils, including Mexican hyenas (!), and the usual big-snake-on-a-tree-limb that appears in all jungle movies of this type. They also encounter a tribe of Hollywood "Indians" in matching wigs. Said "natives" quickly come in handy as baggage carriers.
Meanwhile, Ms. Dahlmann's hair remains soft and manageable, despite the tropical heat. Wasn't there a satellite out here somewhere? And, what about the Hollywood "Indians" that keep melting all over the place?
This movie is a short, yet seemingly endless jungle adventure disguised as a sci-fi epic. It saves all of its real action for the final few minutes. The ultimate revelation is fairly novel, but it's hardly worth enduring the first 90% of this movie to get to it...
Setting out on their journey, the trio encounter many perils, including Mexican hyenas (!), and the usual big-snake-on-a-tree-limb that appears in all jungle movies of this type. They also encounter a tribe of Hollywood "Indians" in matching wigs. Said "natives" quickly come in handy as baggage carriers.
Meanwhile, Ms. Dahlmann's hair remains soft and manageable, despite the tropical heat. Wasn't there a satellite out here somewhere? And, what about the Hollywood "Indians" that keep melting all over the place?
This movie is a short, yet seemingly endless jungle adventure disguised as a sci-fi epic. It saves all of its real action for the final few minutes. The ultimate revelation is fairly novel, but it's hardly worth enduring the first 90% of this movie to get to it...
One of my sci-fi/horror/fantasy reviews written 50 years ago: Directed by Paul Landres; Produced by Arthur Gardner and Jules Levy, for United Artists. Screenplay by Pat Fielder and George Worthing Yates; Photography by Jack MacKenzie; Edited by Jerry Young; Music by Gerald Fried; Makeup by Dick Smith. Starring: Arthur Franz, Kathleen Crowley, Robert Brown, Vince Padula, Kaz Oran, Larry Duran and Rodd Redwing.
Tense and original science-fiction adventure wherein scientists stave off the threat of an impenetrable electronic barrier which expands its radius periodically and inexorably, surrounding a gooey blob monster which returned from space after an early rocket launch.
Tense and original science-fiction adventure wherein scientists stave off the threat of an impenetrable electronic barrier which expands its radius periodically and inexorably, surrounding a gooey blob monster which returned from space after an early rocket launch.