16 reviews
These sort of espionage stories are not favorites of mine unless done with a storyline that is not too convoluted, as is sometimes the case in these kind of spy thrillers. But if they're taut and suspenseful throughout, I can forgive too many complications. Fortunately, the cat-and-mouse game played here is understandable enough and crackles with suspense and tension.
MAN ON A STRING is a spy thriller based on the true-life adventures of a real counter-spy Boris Morros (dubbed Boris Mitrov here), played by ERNEST BORGNINE. While the plotting is far from simple, it's easy enough to enjoy the air of menace and danger that permeates the entire story without getting bogged down into the details of entrapment that always accompany these spy stories.
It moves at a brisk pace under the direction of Andre deToth (for awhile, he was a husband of Veronica Lake in the '40s), and all of it is filmed on locations in East and West Germany. KERWIN MATTHEWS is Borgnine's fellow spy assigned to guide him through the various activities, COLLEEN DEWHURST does well in her second film after a couple of TV roles, and GLENN CORBETT is excellent as a government agent.
It's rather talky for the first hour and then builds to a tense climax among the deserted buildings of East Germany when Mitrov's activities become known to the Russians, which leads to a shootout scene that caps the ending in a satisfying and suspenseful way.
Borgnine gives a solid performance and the film itself is well worth watching.
There's a narration that gives it an almost documentary approach, somewhat like another film produced by Louis De Rochemont, THE HOUSE ON 92nd STREET.
Summing up: Crisp, exciting spy thriller.
MAN ON A STRING is a spy thriller based on the true-life adventures of a real counter-spy Boris Morros (dubbed Boris Mitrov here), played by ERNEST BORGNINE. While the plotting is far from simple, it's easy enough to enjoy the air of menace and danger that permeates the entire story without getting bogged down into the details of entrapment that always accompany these spy stories.
It moves at a brisk pace under the direction of Andre deToth (for awhile, he was a husband of Veronica Lake in the '40s), and all of it is filmed on locations in East and West Germany. KERWIN MATTHEWS is Borgnine's fellow spy assigned to guide him through the various activities, COLLEEN DEWHURST does well in her second film after a couple of TV roles, and GLENN CORBETT is excellent as a government agent.
It's rather talky for the first hour and then builds to a tense climax among the deserted buildings of East Germany when Mitrov's activities become known to the Russians, which leads to a shootout scene that caps the ending in a satisfying and suspenseful way.
Borgnine gives a solid performance and the film itself is well worth watching.
There's a narration that gives it an almost documentary approach, somewhat like another film produced by Louis De Rochemont, THE HOUSE ON 92nd STREET.
Summing up: Crisp, exciting spy thriller.
Based on the real life story of Boris Morros who was a musician instead of a film producer, Man on a String comes at the tale end of the Cold War espionage thrillers where there was absolutely no doubt as to who the good guys and bad guys were on the screen.
I can understand the reason for renaming the lead character that Ernest Borgnine plays Boris Mitrov and changing his occupation even, for dramatic purposes to give the character more scope. But for the life of me was anyone fooled when the agency he worked for was renamed the Central Bureau of Intelligence?
Borris Morros has his own page on IMDb and you can see the rather astonishing list of film credits he had, working on the scoring of a whole lot of films, some of them classics like Stagecoach. His own life gives a lie to the notion that there were no Communists in Hollywood. The blunderbuss approach taken by the House Un-American Activities Committee is another issue altogether.
The Mitrov character we see here isn't exactly stealing the atomic secrets, in fact he's not really doing any spying at all so to speak. As the Russian agent says, all they're doing with him is buying his good name to gain entrée into other places.
Our own CIA knows that and turns him into a double agent where he does perform useful work in identifying Soviet agents here. In real life it wasn't quite as dramatic as shown in Man on a String.
One thing that is of interest is that Man on a String, made as it was in 1960 in the wake of Nikita Khruschev's boast about how he would bury America. That is their attitude, that victory for them was inevitable because Marx said that's how history was flowing. It's interesting to watch this film now in the light of the fall of the Soviet Union. And it fell because it's economy couldn't keep spending militarily and provide its citizens with basic necessities.
Man on a String is a Cold War relic, but interesting viewing nonetheless.
I can understand the reason for renaming the lead character that Ernest Borgnine plays Boris Mitrov and changing his occupation even, for dramatic purposes to give the character more scope. But for the life of me was anyone fooled when the agency he worked for was renamed the Central Bureau of Intelligence?
Borris Morros has his own page on IMDb and you can see the rather astonishing list of film credits he had, working on the scoring of a whole lot of films, some of them classics like Stagecoach. His own life gives a lie to the notion that there were no Communists in Hollywood. The blunderbuss approach taken by the House Un-American Activities Committee is another issue altogether.
The Mitrov character we see here isn't exactly stealing the atomic secrets, in fact he's not really doing any spying at all so to speak. As the Russian agent says, all they're doing with him is buying his good name to gain entrée into other places.
Our own CIA knows that and turns him into a double agent where he does perform useful work in identifying Soviet agents here. In real life it wasn't quite as dramatic as shown in Man on a String.
One thing that is of interest is that Man on a String, made as it was in 1960 in the wake of Nikita Khruschev's boast about how he would bury America. That is their attitude, that victory for them was inevitable because Marx said that's how history was flowing. It's interesting to watch this film now in the light of the fall of the Soviet Union. And it fell because it's economy couldn't keep spending militarily and provide its citizens with basic necessities.
Man on a String is a Cold War relic, but interesting viewing nonetheless.
- bkoganbing
- May 18, 2007
- Permalink
- bsmith5552
- Jul 22, 2019
- Permalink
"Man on a String" stars the great Ernest Borgnine ("The Wild Bunch") as Boris Mitrov, a character inspired by the real-life Borris Morros. Boris is a Russian-born American citizen running a film studio who is essentially blackmailed into becoming a counter-spy. This will see him travel to both Berlin and Moscow to gather information for the amusingly dubbed "C. B. I." (the "Central Bureau of Intelligence"!).
"Man on a String" is largely notable for taking a documentary-style approach, complete with narration, by both Clete Roberts ("The Swinger") and Borgnine himself. The Roberts narration mostly tells us things we can already see for ourselves, while Borgnines' voice-over is more interesting as he observes the progress of his homeland and its citizens decades later. Overall, the film is generally entertaining, although it's largely dialogue and performance driven, only working in some action and suspense during the finale. But this finale is quite good, as we see the unarmed Boris running for his life and we wonder *how* he can possibly get out of a life-or-death situation.
Borgnine is thoroughly engaging here, and is ably supported by fantasy star Kerwin Mathews ("The 7th Voyage of Sinbad") here wearing a suit and tie as Boris' "assistant" at the studio. The excellent supporting cast also includes Colleen Dewhurst ("The Dead Zone"), Alexander Scourby ("The Big Heat"), Glenn Corbett ("Chisum"), Russian-born character actor Vladimir Sokoloff ("The Magnificent Seven"), who's endearing as Boris' father, and Ed Prentiss ('Trackdown').
Partly working as a travelogue, the globe-hopping also helps to make this espionage thriller decent entertainment, and in fact the film employed four different cinematographers for its four main settings. The efficient direction is courtesy of Hungarian-born Andre De Toth, who made his mark as a filmmaker with such efforts as the original "House of Wax" and the film noir classic "Crime Wave".
Seven out of 10.
"Man on a String" is largely notable for taking a documentary-style approach, complete with narration, by both Clete Roberts ("The Swinger") and Borgnine himself. The Roberts narration mostly tells us things we can already see for ourselves, while Borgnines' voice-over is more interesting as he observes the progress of his homeland and its citizens decades later. Overall, the film is generally entertaining, although it's largely dialogue and performance driven, only working in some action and suspense during the finale. But this finale is quite good, as we see the unarmed Boris running for his life and we wonder *how* he can possibly get out of a life-or-death situation.
Borgnine is thoroughly engaging here, and is ably supported by fantasy star Kerwin Mathews ("The 7th Voyage of Sinbad") here wearing a suit and tie as Boris' "assistant" at the studio. The excellent supporting cast also includes Colleen Dewhurst ("The Dead Zone"), Alexander Scourby ("The Big Heat"), Glenn Corbett ("Chisum"), Russian-born character actor Vladimir Sokoloff ("The Magnificent Seven"), who's endearing as Boris' father, and Ed Prentiss ('Trackdown').
Partly working as a travelogue, the globe-hopping also helps to make this espionage thriller decent entertainment, and in fact the film employed four different cinematographers for its four main settings. The efficient direction is courtesy of Hungarian-born Andre De Toth, who made his mark as a filmmaker with such efforts as the original "House of Wax" and the film noir classic "Crime Wave".
Seven out of 10.
- Hey_Sweden
- May 23, 2022
- Permalink
- Poseidon-3
- Aug 15, 2007
- Permalink
There are Things that Highlight this Low-Budget Spy Drama based on a True Account.
Ernest Borgnine in a Rather Restrained Performance that doesn't quite Capture the Suspense and Intrigue Needed to Fully Flesh Out the Super-Serious Story.
But it has some Intrigue with Agents on Both Sides Everywhere except Under the Bed.
Gadgets Galore Proliferate Scenes with Tape Recorders, Cameras, and a Myriad of Privacy Penetrating Hardware Showcased Regularly Through this Detailed Drama.
It Depicts the Soviets in Full Force Plotting Their way to World Domination.
The Second Half Kicks-In after a Slow and Talky Start.
There are Interesting Plot Devices as Director De Toth Builds Suspense with Odd Scenes of Behind the Scenes at KGB.
Above Average and Definitely Worth a Watch for Anyone Attracted to Cold-War Espionage Films.
And this was Before the James Bond Films made all of this Big-Box-Office.
Ernest Borgnine in a Rather Restrained Performance that doesn't quite Capture the Suspense and Intrigue Needed to Fully Flesh Out the Super-Serious Story.
But it has some Intrigue with Agents on Both Sides Everywhere except Under the Bed.
Gadgets Galore Proliferate Scenes with Tape Recorders, Cameras, and a Myriad of Privacy Penetrating Hardware Showcased Regularly Through this Detailed Drama.
It Depicts the Soviets in Full Force Plotting Their way to World Domination.
The Second Half Kicks-In after a Slow and Talky Start.
There are Interesting Plot Devices as Director De Toth Builds Suspense with Odd Scenes of Behind the Scenes at KGB.
Above Average and Definitely Worth a Watch for Anyone Attracted to Cold-War Espionage Films.
And this was Before the James Bond Films made all of this Big-Box-Office.
- LeonLouisRicci
- Sep 6, 2021
- Permalink
This is a decent Cold War film about a Russian film director working in the United States. While he is not a Communist, his "friends" are and while he tells himself he isn't working for them, he has accepted favors and naively thinks it will all somehow work out. However, when he is confronted by the CBI(?) (a fictional US government agency), he realizes he's become a Communist stooge and agrees to help the US in a counter-espionage mission behind the Iron Curtain.
While the film is a decent enough time-passer and the last 1/3 of the film is pretty exciting, it has one giant problem and a few small ones. Oddly, they decided to cast Ernest Borgnine as the Russian Director yet he never even sounds the least bit Russian and you can STILL detect his New York accent. This makes the entire film seem rather cheesy and very tough to believe. Had they recast the film and perhaps punched up the first 1/3, it could have been an exciting spy yarn. Oddly, just a few years later, Borgnine was cast as a Russian in ICE STATION ZEBRA and he was able to do a decent Russian accent! Additionally, when Borgnine's character went to Moscow, it looked like a bad travelogue with all the stock footage inserted rather haphazzardly into the movie. As it is, it's just passable entertainment and a mildly interesting curio of the Cold War.
By the way, don't get the idea I hate Cold War films--I am a history teacher and naturally love a good espionage film and could recommend several good ones such as I MARRIED A COMMUNIST and ASSIGNMENT Paris.
While the film is a decent enough time-passer and the last 1/3 of the film is pretty exciting, it has one giant problem and a few small ones. Oddly, they decided to cast Ernest Borgnine as the Russian Director yet he never even sounds the least bit Russian and you can STILL detect his New York accent. This makes the entire film seem rather cheesy and very tough to believe. Had they recast the film and perhaps punched up the first 1/3, it could have been an exciting spy yarn. Oddly, just a few years later, Borgnine was cast as a Russian in ICE STATION ZEBRA and he was able to do a decent Russian accent! Additionally, when Borgnine's character went to Moscow, it looked like a bad travelogue with all the stock footage inserted rather haphazzardly into the movie. As it is, it's just passable entertainment and a mildly interesting curio of the Cold War.
By the way, don't get the idea I hate Cold War films--I am a history teacher and naturally love a good espionage film and could recommend several good ones such as I MARRIED A COMMUNIST and ASSIGNMENT Paris.
- planktonrules
- Aug 26, 2007
- Permalink
Had no idea if I was going to enjoy this film from 1960, but I had a good idea that Ernest Borgniine, ( Boris Mitrov) would put his heart and soul into his role and he did just that through out the entire film. This was a true story concerning a man who was called Borris Morras, and in this picture was called Boris Mitrov a double agent between the United States and Russia during the Cold War Era. Boris Mitrov is a successful Hollywood producer who was born in Russia and got himself involved with Russian Spys who were willing to bring his father and brothers back from Russia to his home in Los Angeles. However, Boris Mitrov is being watched by our Government Agents and they decided to enlist Boris to become a double agent for the United States in order to be cleared of the charges for espionage against the U.S. There is plenty of suspense and this story takes many twists and turns.
André De Toth's Man on a String is a well made film despite its modest budget. The story is based on a real person and is mostly believeable, except perhaps for some of the derring-do in the finale, which I doubt happened. It conveys the tense vibe of the Cold War before the Berlin Wall was erected. The careful and meticulous espionage here, and the manipulation of individuals on both sides, is convincing. The photography is excellent and I didn't mind at all the many process shots of Moscow, as filming on location there was not possible for this subject matter ! Ernest Borgnine gives a fine performance.
- PaulusLoZebra
- Jun 27, 2025
- Permalink
Ernest Borgnine, now almost 90 years of age and still acting for Hollywood, went in 1960 to Berlin to play the main character called Boris Mitrov in an east - west drama of director André de Thoth called Man On The String. He is the man on the (black and white) run for cover through east Berlin before the great Wall was built and Kennedy named himself a Berliner. Borgnine has learned in Moscow the names of American spies in the states; he memorizes them and is picked up by a friendly helper next to the American sector and is taken in a nice Mercedes sedan car back to Uncle Sams sector where he spills the beans. Not much later Billy Wilder went to Berlin as well an made a great comedy about Coca Cola and the rest of the world. De Thoth picture isn't funny at all and actually the time before and after the making of the big Wall was not to laugh at. So director de Thoth decided to play the semi documentary card and one must say he succeeded in giving an impression of the area around the Brandenburg Gate and the nowhere land that is today called again Pariser Platz. So the artwork he took straight from the streets and ruins of cause of the western sectors. 15 years after the war quite some parts of West Berlin still looked pretty far from nowadays and were well to use as action areas suggesting the Hollywood staff had permission to film beyond the American sector right in the middle of East Berlin.
Borgnine is an unusual type of spy and he decorates the scenes in the Moscow offices of the soviet secret service fairly well. Of cause he is not Paul Newman who is also a spy memorizing a secret formula in the Torn Curtain of Mr. Hitchcock a little later but not a bad alternative.
The area next to the reborn American embassy and also not far from the Russian embassy was in the meantime nicely swept and one would need skilled optical and digital works to bring back an image of the invisible iron curtain of 1960. Spy games of the old fashion type are presently not fashionable, spy games star no more Borgnine but Redford and Pitt and are placed in the near east in colour and scope. I am beginning to like Borgnine in his black suit tumbling over the ruins of Berlin and showing his life long gap between teeth.
Borgnine is an unusual type of spy and he decorates the scenes in the Moscow offices of the soviet secret service fairly well. Of cause he is not Paul Newman who is also a spy memorizing a secret formula in the Torn Curtain of Mr. Hitchcock a little later but not a bad alternative.
The area next to the reborn American embassy and also not far from the Russian embassy was in the meantime nicely swept and one would need skilled optical and digital works to bring back an image of the invisible iron curtain of 1960. Spy games of the old fashion type are presently not fashionable, spy games star no more Borgnine but Redford and Pitt and are placed in the near east in colour and scope. I am beginning to like Borgnine in his black suit tumbling over the ruins of Berlin and showing his life long gap between teeth.
- luckysilien
- Mar 16, 2004
- Permalink
I saw also directed by André De Toth "The Mongols" (1961)I mongoli (original title) with the one and only Jack Palance, a movie I liked when I was a teenager. Here in "Man on a String" we have the one and only Ernest Borgnine, another excellent actor, who delighted me in many films, especially in "Emperor of the North" (1973), with the great Lee Marvin, "The Wild Bunch" (1969), "All Quiet on the Western Front" (1979). I've seen him also in the excellent "Marty" (1955), with which he won the Oscar. Here he plays another complex role, in fact, a double role... All the other actors are very good, Kerwin Mathews probably in his best role, Colleen Dewhurst, very good too, etc. all of them. Just watch and judge for yourself!
- RodrigAndrisan
- Jun 30, 2020
- Permalink
- mark.waltz
- Dec 10, 2024
- Permalink
Ernest Borgnine is the "Man on a String" spy who is persuaded to work for the Central Bureau of Intelligence (which is supposed to be the CIA, of course). He is a movie producer, and is relocated to Berlin, to be close to the Communist enemies. The actors read their lines like they're bored to death. Mr. Borgnine sets the tone - his dialog is mostly, monotone, soft-spoken, and emotionless. Maybe this is how you are supposed to play a Russian spy? A narration relentlessly punctuates the drama with a mostly, monotone, soft-spoken, and emotionless off-screen explanation of the unfolding on-screen events.
It also makes sure we viewers know Communists are very bad people.
Kerwin Mathews plays the friend and partner spy. He has more expression, and tries to liven Borgnine and the others up; but they doggedly resist. Mr. Mathews' performance is not bad, and I wondered, in his scenes with Borgnine, if Mathews was wondering: what happened to the great actor from "Marty" and "From Here to Eternity"?
*** Man on a String (1960) Andre De Toth ~ Ernest Borgnine, Kerwin Mathews, Colleen Dewhurst
It also makes sure we viewers know Communists are very bad people.
Kerwin Mathews plays the friend and partner spy. He has more expression, and tries to liven Borgnine and the others up; but they doggedly resist. Mr. Mathews' performance is not bad, and I wondered, in his scenes with Borgnine, if Mathews was wondering: what happened to the great actor from "Marty" and "From Here to Eternity"?
*** Man on a String (1960) Andre De Toth ~ Ernest Borgnine, Kerwin Mathews, Colleen Dewhurst
- wes-connors
- Aug 13, 2007
- Permalink
Well, that's not an authentic red scare period film, as were BIG JIM MC LAIN, INVASION USA, WHIP HAND, and so many US propaganda films that spread during the fifties. It speaks of the war between Western authorities and Behind the iron Curtain forces, the "evil" ones, but in a smart, sensitive, and brilliant way. It is purely espionage, spy scheme, as there were so many in the sixties, and even after. Ernest Borgnine is excellent in this ambivalent role, for whom the audiences of this era, who were more used to be on the good American side, for once, could feel a bit discomfortable with such an unusual lead character. Solid Andre De Toth directing.
- searchanddestroy-1
- Jan 12, 2023
- Permalink
As a Russian emigrant having made a career in Hollywood with excellent international contacts, he is practically coerced by CIA to serve America by accepting to play a role as a double agent, with a mission to by his contacts find out as much as possible about what is going on in the Kremlin, he accepts the task reluctantly for his father's sake who was recently helped out of Russia, and by his excellent way of cultivating contacts he is successful, but nevertheless he has a narrow escape when he finally unvoidably is compromised. What makes the film and story interesting and sustained is the fact that it all happened in reality. Borgnine makes an unusual but excellent perfomance completely out of his normal range, and the thriller is fascinating in its authenticity to say the least.