Indian Territory

Gene produced this entry, while Columbia distributed. I mention this because the programmer includes stock footage from Columbia that I'm sure they made available to Gene. It wasn't uncommon for budget productions to use stock footage for expensive scenes, and I'm sure shrewd businessman Autry did it in an entirely legal manner.

Anyhow, the movie is a better-than-average entry, with some unusual touches— for example, a longer run-time (70-minutes); Gene loses out more than usual; he shares good guy chores with Kirby Grant; and no buffoonery from Buttram in an unusual straight role. The plot's a fairly standard one where Gene helps pacify hostile Apaches and stop gun-running from an ex-Austrian nobleman and his half-Apache hit-man. There're lots of flying fists, but not much hard-riding or fast-shooting. There's also lots of striking desert scenery, along with a really good sing-along "Chatanooga…". Gail Davis doesn't get much screen time, but makes the most of what she has. All in all, I thought the programmer was an entertaining effort, breaking some of the standard matinée conventions.

A "7" on the matinée scale.

I watched the movie Arizona from 1940, starring Jean Arthur and William Holden.

A scene in the movie had a cattle herd being stampeded by Indians. William Holden had the cowboys turn the herd against the Indians. Later, the cattle were herded through the town.

In the movie, Indian Territory 1950, the same scenario was used by Gene Autry, to turn the stampeding herd into the charging Indians. He, also, convinced the owner of the herd to drive the herd through town.

Because I saw the movies on back-to-back days, it became clear to me the scenes used were exactly the same in each movie. Even the scene, of the Indian camp, before the stampede, were the same.

Is it possible that Autry "stole" the scenes from Arizona and used the same footage in his movie, Indian Territory? I saw nothing in the credits of Indian Territory, referencing the use of clips from the movie, Arizona.

In a sense, I agree with the previous reviewer. James Griffith is horribly miscast as an Indian. He's too tall, and too old to be classified as a "kid" (with a die-job and the proper makeup, Dick Jones would have been much better in the role). That said, this is one of the best Autry films, mainly due to the added action (outlaws actually get shot and die, instead of roped or getting their gun shot out of their hand). Most of Autry's movies were horribly benign, but this one is not. Even James Griffith gives us his best, even if he is miscast. Gene does some fine singing in this one, notably Chattanoogie Shoeshine Boy. Green Acres alum Pat Buttram is on hand, along with lovely Gail Davis. A good one.

One challenge which these "singing cowboy" movies face is how the music fits in. In this case, I would say "tolerably." I also expect some comic relief, which Pat Buttram adequately provides here. Sorry, but James Griffith does not meet my expectation of an "old west" character. The storyline has Gene helping investigate Indian raids on a supply route. It's clarified that this is contrary to Indian conduct and that these renegades are led by a man who's half-white, working for a caucasian Austrian. Simultaneously, a cattleman and his daughter encounter difficulties settling in the area. When it comes to top-notch Autry movies, however, this is NOT an example.

I like all of Gene's movies.

But this one has a glaring historical error.

He sings "Chattanooga Shoeshine Boy" which was published in 1950.

Problem is, the setting of this movie is set sometime in the 1870's, 80 years before the song was written.

Oh well, a minor detail .

I suppose the writers paid little attention to accuracy when it came to Gene's singing and his tendency to interrupt the story line to entertain us with some music.

But as a former history teacher and historical buff, it is disconcerting to me to watch this play out in a movie as I try to enjoy it.

At any rate I will continue to enjoy Autry's westerns.