IMDb RATING
6.6/10
251
YOUR RATING
An actor is recalled to active duty with the Army's C.I.D. to find the thief who stole historical jewels in occupied Germany and the trail leads to the boyfriend of a young debutante from Be... Read allAn actor is recalled to active duty with the Army's C.I.D. to find the thief who stole historical jewels in occupied Germany and the trail leads to the boyfriend of a young debutante from Bel Air.An actor is recalled to active duty with the Army's C.I.D. to find the thief who stole historical jewels in occupied Germany and the trail leads to the boyfriend of a young debutante from Bel Air.
- Nominated for 1 Oscar
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
Dee J. Thompson
- Mary Jane Frobisher
- (as D.J. Thompson)
George M. Carleton
- Mr. Grant
- (as George Carleton)
Edna Holland
- Mrs. Grant
- (as Edna M. Holland)
Featured reviews
Collie Lang (Robert Montgomery) is an aspiring actor - though he seems a bit old to just be aspiring. Maybe the war delayed his plans? This is never explained. His mother is an accomplished attorney. She must have been practicing in the roaring 20s - what a trailblazer. But I digress.
The beginning of the film shows Collie appearing on a movie set dressed in kilts and speaking his lines that include the title - "once more my darling" while focusing on a set technician who looks like a bulldog. This is amusing in and of itself, but even more so if you know something about Montgomery's career. Twenty years before, in Buster Keaton's sound debut "Free and Easy", he was forced to dress up like a Cossack and sing a duet. It was ridiculous, so maybe Montgomery is reminiscing?
Montgomery, as an army reservist, is unwillingly pressed back into service to romance a debutante so that he can out her jewel thieving boyfriend, who is apparently very jealous. Why is the US government interested in a jewel caper? Because the purloined jewels came from a European estate that is still under allied supervision. The reason they pick him? He's "pretty". That's it. Not his acting skills or anything else. This is the preposterous premise I mention in the title.
The debutante turns out to be Ann Blythe in a delightful and unexpected performance as "Killer"/Marita Connell. She is a very quirky girl who speaks her every thought to everyone she meets while soaking herself in a particularly pungent perfume. Montgomery directed this film and he did a great job with this screwball comedy about ten years after that genre reached the height of its popularity.
It does get close to breeching the production code at times. For example, there is a scene where Killer and Collie are sharing the same hotel room, Killer is wearing a skimpy tennis outfit with the word "KILLER" embroidered across the front, and they are discussing whether or not they are safe.
Very much recommended if you can ever find a copy.
The beginning of the film shows Collie appearing on a movie set dressed in kilts and speaking his lines that include the title - "once more my darling" while focusing on a set technician who looks like a bulldog. This is amusing in and of itself, but even more so if you know something about Montgomery's career. Twenty years before, in Buster Keaton's sound debut "Free and Easy", he was forced to dress up like a Cossack and sing a duet. It was ridiculous, so maybe Montgomery is reminiscing?
Montgomery, as an army reservist, is unwillingly pressed back into service to romance a debutante so that he can out her jewel thieving boyfriend, who is apparently very jealous. Why is the US government interested in a jewel caper? Because the purloined jewels came from a European estate that is still under allied supervision. The reason they pick him? He's "pretty". That's it. Not his acting skills or anything else. This is the preposterous premise I mention in the title.
The debutante turns out to be Ann Blythe in a delightful and unexpected performance as "Killer"/Marita Connell. She is a very quirky girl who speaks her every thought to everyone she meets while soaking herself in a particularly pungent perfume. Montgomery directed this film and he did a great job with this screwball comedy about ten years after that genre reached the height of its popularity.
It does get close to breeching the production code at times. For example, there is a scene where Killer and Collie are sharing the same hotel room, Killer is wearing a skimpy tennis outfit with the word "KILLER" embroidered across the front, and they are discussing whether or not they are safe.
Very much recommended if you can ever find a copy.
This movie had a plot of having a good screwball comedy. The selection of the stars was a I felt a bit wanting. Robert was (he was about 45 and looked so too) looked to be a bit too old for Ann. She was only 21, and on screen 19, and her personality suited the role, of a scatter-brained teenager (she did quite a few roles of this type, and successfully too). But probbaly he wanted it to be his vehicle (he was the director to this movie too), though not on the screenplay team for this movie, I wonder, why didn't Joan Harrison interfere ?
The movie was quite good, and without much hiccups for about one hour (which is two third of the movie), but the moment the two eloped, it (the movie) simply went to pieces and even till the end, they couldn't or may be didn't want to, gather them back.
To her credit, Ann did try to keep the things to some order, and was quite convincing as the scatter-brained teenager. I would rather say she lived in the imaginary world of pulp-romantic-novels, which in real life too some do, and with her personality, she could very successfully live it, without being an eyesore, and I said, while the scene was her, she did it.
But who disappointed (after the hour mark), was Robert, both as actor, but more so as director. One who had been put in sleuth job, can't be that idiot. In fact the movie had simply degenerated into a pulp from there. Whether the sequence of forcing a clearly uninterested stranger, into a police agent, the police party, clearly looking for them, missing the parked car in broad day light, and that too three times ? Or they having put only one 'Police Marker' for the 300 miles journey? What if they had been ambushed on the way? Which would have been the intelligent thing to do. Or the cycle overtaking the car (lifted from Katharina, Die Letzte , there it was necessary, and was justified by situation) ? Why didn't the heist-man shoot the prone and perfect target, hero in the first place? How the police, who were supposed to be on hot trail, and that too the MP, reach the site after not only everything is over, but also two other parties have traced to rescue/ save the girl from the lecherous hero, and many such sequences. All these were in fact not necessary, and with minor thought, movie would have reached the same conclusion, without becoming an eyesore.
Only for the sake of Ann Blyth, one can watch it, she looked quite charming as the almost-child "Killer" role, else,...
The movie was quite good, and without much hiccups for about one hour (which is two third of the movie), but the moment the two eloped, it (the movie) simply went to pieces and even till the end, they couldn't or may be didn't want to, gather them back.
To her credit, Ann did try to keep the things to some order, and was quite convincing as the scatter-brained teenager. I would rather say she lived in the imaginary world of pulp-romantic-novels, which in real life too some do, and with her personality, she could very successfully live it, without being an eyesore, and I said, while the scene was her, she did it.
But who disappointed (after the hour mark), was Robert, both as actor, but more so as director. One who had been put in sleuth job, can't be that idiot. In fact the movie had simply degenerated into a pulp from there. Whether the sequence of forcing a clearly uninterested stranger, into a police agent, the police party, clearly looking for them, missing the parked car in broad day light, and that too three times ? Or they having put only one 'Police Marker' for the 300 miles journey? What if they had been ambushed on the way? Which would have been the intelligent thing to do. Or the cycle overtaking the car (lifted from Katharina, Die Letzte , there it was necessary, and was justified by situation) ? Why didn't the heist-man shoot the prone and perfect target, hero in the first place? How the police, who were supposed to be on hot trail, and that too the MP, reach the site after not only everything is over, but also two other parties have traced to rescue/ save the girl from the lecherous hero, and many such sequences. All these were in fact not necessary, and with minor thought, movie would have reached the same conclusion, without becoming an eyesore.
Only for the sake of Ann Blyth, one can watch it, she looked quite charming as the almost-child "Killer" role, else,...
I like Montgomery in several movies, especially "The Night Has Eyes" with Rosalind Russell. However, this movie is clearly not one of his best. The plot does not make sense. No one would believe for a moment that Ann Blythe would fall in love with Robert Montgomery, at least not in this movie. For this movie to be a comedy, the only time I found myself laughing was when the older woman (at his mother's shindig)asks Blythe's character if she is the one who is wearing the perfume shortly before she coughs. Charles McGraw (I know I keep talking about him, but you know he's my favorite actor)could have seen his role beefed up since it is obvious his character is a comedic foil for Collie's character. Definitely not a good day for Montgomery and company. I do not think the people responsible for this movie really thought it through before making it. I'm glad Montgomery rebounded later with "They Were Expendable". He went on to become a speech adviser for President Eisenhower. Mercedyz
Engaging comedy with a rather nutty premise but the skillful playing of the cast make it work. Ann Blyth embraces her inner ditz as the bubbly, forward teen who is instantly smitten with Montgomery on sight. Montgomery, one of the best light comedians of Golden Age Hollywood, carries the film right along with an air of deer in the headlights helplessness at the onslaught of ardor that Ann's character unleashes his way. Theatre great Jane Cowl is also highly amusing in one of only four film appearance's as Bob's mother.
One small drawback. Montgomery is a perfect choice for the breeziness necessary to make his character work but he was 45 at the time this was made and looks it, whereas Ann Blyth was 24 playing 19 and is convincing as such making their pairing a bit off. They would have been better paired as a father and daughter at this point. Be that as it may this is still a pleasant little known film.
One small drawback. Montgomery is a perfect choice for the breeziness necessary to make his character work but he was 45 at the time this was made and looks it, whereas Ann Blyth was 24 playing 19 and is convincing as such making their pairing a bit off. They would have been better paired as a father and daughter at this point. Be that as it may this is still a pleasant little known film.
I was surprised, "Once More, My Darling", had not generated enough votes (at this writing) for a "user rating". It's a "screwy" comedy I have enjoyed many times over the years. Robert Montgomery's mission places him in some very improbable situations, and he's just the man for the job. He maintains his trademark "befuddled" look throughout the film and hysterically, too. Ann Blyth plays his precocious/eccentric pursuer, who assumes a relationship that does not exist. Her character is kooky enough to warrant the unearned nickname "Killer", but remains cute and cuddly.
Among the glut of "B" movies from the late 1940's and 1950's, "Once More, My Darling" is a standout. This one is worth looking for....
Among the glut of "B" movies from the late 1940's and 1950's, "Once More, My Darling" is a standout. This one is worth looking for....
Did you know
- TriviaDirector Michael Gordon was replaced one week into production by Robert Montgomery.
- Quotes
Collier Laing: Mr. Burke, you've got thirty-two teeth. Would you like to try for none?
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Once More, My Darling
- Filming locations
- Santa Barbara, California, USA(background footage)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 32 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content