Objectif Lune

In the far-flung future of the 1970's, turmoil on Earth has forced colonization of the Moon. A Space Station has been constructed in the Lunar orbit. Now, a mission to the station is a target for sabotage.

PROJECT MOON BASE features: #1- A General (Hayden Rorke) who threatens to put a Colonel (Donna Martell) "over his knee"! #2- Quite possibly cinema's most preposterous rocket launch, complete with screams, moans, idiotic facial expressions, and wobbly rockets! #3- Luckily, the mission crew are all wearing ultra-short shorts, and sporting teapot cozies on their heads! #4- A ludicrous, slow-motion fight sequence, replete with more gape-mouthed buffoonery! #5- Loads of crackpot camera angles! #6- Wonky Moon Music, including a theremin! #7- Ridiculous romance!

A rib-tickling riot from start to finish! Just add intoxicants...

At face value there's no reason why you should notice "Project Moon Base". It's as old-school as any 1950s sci-fi flick can be, with a really corny plot. But it does catch my eye. The general is played by none other than Hayden Rorke, best known as Dr. Bellows on "I Dream of Jeannie". Yes, the man who spent eternity trying to figure out the unusual behavior of the small screen's most famous astronaut plays another character involved in sending people on space missions. And this time there's an impostor out to sabotage the mission. What's really confusing is how the movie contains a mixture of dated scenes (the last scene) and progressive ideas (a female president). What gives?

It's mostly a hokey movie. Nonetheless, that scene where the spaceship docks with the space station must've caused a lot of snickering when the movie first got released. As for Hayden Rorke, Barbara Eden noted that he was open about his homosexuality with the "I Dream of Jeannie" cast, and that they all got to meet his partner.

I understand that "Project Moon Base" got riffed on "Mystery Science Theater 3000", but I've never seen that episode.

In the early '50s when real space travel was yet another 8 years in the future, this was average view of space travel for most people. In that paradigm, movie like this was a pretty standard format as a space rocket based stories.

Story's premise sound's ridiculous now that a rocket goes off course and can land on moon as an alternate plan and become the first people to land on the moon, but movie like this was never intended to be a serious science fiction. Some things were predicted accurately such as giant screen TV monitor, and forward thinking concept such as woman president of the country.

But let's get to the bottom line here. The only thing that's worth watching in this movie in my opinion is the beautiful Donna Martel. She looks great as the female astronaut. This movie would not be worth a watch without her.

Movie is a bit of cheese, but I find decent entertainment, and not a terrible movie to watch. I like this movie better than many of the rocket movies from this era such as Cat Woman of the Moon.

So, I wouldn't give a high rating, but it's an okay movie for this category.

I came across this 1953 movie on Free TV streaming. It is barely over 60 minutes long so isn't too much different from a one hour TV show.

I find it interesting that almost 70 years ago this work of fiction so accurately foreshadowed some of the things going on today, in 2022. There is a space station in orbit around the Earth and they accurately explain why a person feel weightless on it. They use magnetic shoes inside the space station and there are signs "please do not walk on the walls."

Also there is a proposal to build a station on the Moon, another thing our current Artemis program is headed towards. In this story a team of three are to orbit the Moon to photograph the back side. For some reason not completely explained they end up having to land there in a crater and then get inventive to establish radio contact with Earth.

One of the crew members was a female officer, a novelty for the early 1950s as relates to sending people in space. However, as with almost all pre-space movies the crew boards a few minutes before launch, and all are wearing short shorts and snug-fitting tee shirts, even the men. They just strap themselves onto cots and go.

The drama in this story involves a rogue group out to destroy the space station, they find a look-a-like to substitute for one of the scientists in the initial trip to the space station.

Judged by 21st century standards this is not a very good movie and the special effects are not realistic at all. Still I found it to be a worthwhile glimpse into a time when space exploration was still just a dream, and how fiction writers and movie producers envisioned how it might be.

Despite my hopes for suspense when the foreign baddies get a double agent aboard the rocket ship, there's hardly a touch of white-knuckles anywhere in the 63-minutes. Looks like director Talmadge specialized in stunts rather than dramatizing scripts, and it shows in the stretched out results with no edges. Then too, the much amended script doesn't help (IMDB). And get a load of Col. Briteis (bright eyes !), played by malt shop cutie Martell. So what if she leads the moonbase expedition in revealing beach party shorts and top. What the heck, It's like sending Gidget to Mars. At the same time, her eye-candy cuteness distracted me from most every serious scene. Talk about commercially inspired casting: it doesn't come any more obvious.

Sure, it's a cheap drive-in indie, so how much could be expected from the outset. Nonetheless, the special effects aren't that bad given budget constraints and outer space backdrops. Then too, production avoids Cold War stereotyping of bad guys into evil commie plotters in dark shadow. Instead, master-mind Roundtree is more robotic and brightly lit than evil. And how about that ridiculous moon base wedding imposed, I suspect, by the puritanical Production Code. Can't let two unmarrieds co-habit, even in a rocket ship. No wonder distinguished writer Heinlein disowned the results (IMDB). All in all, my advice is to let this sleepy 10-day production lie.

(In passing- Can't help noticing current US plans for an outer-space armada are titled 'Space Force', same as in the movie. And that's along with justifying rhetoric similar to the movie's. All in all, looks like the loony flick cast a forward shadow, after all. )