User reviews

"Walk East on Beacon" is a 1952 film starring George Murphy, about a G-man after a Communist sleeper cell. Set in Boston, it's a dry, unexciting look at police procedure, which we all know is plodding to begin with.

Narrated by Westbrook Van Vorhees, the film uses a documentary style often used for this type of film in the '50s. It usually signals an unexciting film, which this is.

George Murphy wasn't a great actor, but he was certainly charming. He isn't able to use much of his charm in this. The theme of the film isn't uncommon and has been better done.

The Boston locations were fun, but that's about it. If you're looking for thrills, go elsewhere.

"Walk East on Beacon!" is a product of the times. Following WWII, the good will between the US and USSR bottomed out quickly and instead of being friends, the Soviets took over Eastern Europe and parts of East Asia. In response, the US became very paranoid about communism and the notion of communists infiltrating the county....so a movie like this isn't the least bit surprising. Some of the movies are fun to watch...some, like this one, are surprisingly ordinary.

The film is about an attempt by communist moles to capture a top scientist and force him to work for the USSR. Professor Kafer (Finlay Currie) is worried because his son disappeared. Apparently, the communists have kidnapped him and say they'll return him IF the Professor cooperates. Fortunately, American FBI agents are on the case and hope to not only rescue the son but break up this network of spies.

The story was interesting. But it also was surprisingly low energy considering the subject matter. Also, having George Murphy anchor the film didn't help, as he always seemed more passive than most actors....and here he gives a typically bland performance. Overall, not a bad film....but I would have expected more fireworks considering the topic.

Egomaniac, Hypocrite, and Big Brother J. Edgar Hoover's stain is all over this Red Scare Movie. Another McCarthy Era Propaganda Piece that the Government, in League with Hollywood, pushed on the Public in the early Post War Years. It is a Movie that is Cold and without Emotion, ironically just like the Commies.

Among its many Sins, one is the way it inaccurately equated the Russians with the Nazis for nothing more than analogous Angst. Did anyone remember that it was just a few short Years prior that Germany invaded Russia, and Russia invaded Germany. They hated each other. But in the World of Government Mind Control, that memory is wiped.

This is an interesting Artifact of the Time to be sure, and a reflection on the Temperament. As Entertainment it is so stilted that the whole thing barely has a Heartbeat although it tries, so seriously, to make its case that anything resembling a Human Being is lost in the Fog of the Cold War. If there's still any doubt about the Evil of Hoover and his Megalomania, check out all the dismembered Head Shots of J. Edgar floating about in quite a few of the office Scenes.

Worth a view for Cold War Historians and "Safety for Freedoms" researchers. It is a Movie masquerading as your Friend. Early on the Film mentions how in the USA Citizens go about their Daily Lives freely because of the Bill of Rights. That creepy, prying TV Camera in the Shop was just the beginning. A Harbinger for sure.

This is definitely not a "hysterical anti-communist screed" but a plodding 1950's manhunt story with Westbrook Van Vorhees as the narrator.It would be simple to ignore the ineffective demagoguery of Joe McCarthy as based on fiction, but the U.S.S.R. did aggressively spy on the U.S. and other allies during and after W.W.2 and its party organization and members were totally controlled by Moscow. This whole picture was shot on location but it lacks the punch of such other realistic films as CALLING NORTHSIDE 777, BOOMERANG, IRON CURTAIN etc.

Murphy wasn't much of an actor and comes off as bland as he was when the host of MGM PARADE.

An hysterical anti-communist screed dolled up in the drag of a police procedural, Walk East On Beacon simply isn't up to the task of alerting us to the dangers of a Fifth Column in our midst. Well filmed but weedily written (and based on a magazine article by the Dark Prince of the F.B.I., J. Edgar Hoover), the film stars Republican senator-in-waiting George Murphy as a G-Man hot on the heels of a Red sleeper cell. Murphy was never much of an actor, and here he's strictly in Jack Webb just-the-facts-ma'am territory. Location photography in Boston gives the film a boost, but overall Walk East On Beacon! can't match either the red hot emotional power of Pickup On South Street or the creepy intensity of My Son John, two other Red Menace films of the period.

I have recently reviewed Red Manace, a film similar to this one on the Red Scare of the 1950s. That film is superior to this one because of the writing. This one had the better actors, director, and production values, but the writing was as predictable as the Orioles not getting into the playoffs. In Walk East, the script has everything colored in black and white, with no shades of gray. Real life is not like that in the least. There are always shades of gray. There is no pancake so flat that it does not have two sides. We never get to see the other side of the story. What motivated these people to be become communists? When Jews were sent to concentration camps in WW2, only the Socialists fought for their release. Socialism was popular in every country that had overreactive Fascist governments previous to their presence. Classical American democracy was seldom practiced in any of these countries, so Socialism was the only viable alternative. We do not see this in this, or mort other red scare films of the fifties. The bottom line for this film was that Russia developed space travel BEFORE the US. It was only after we dedicated far more money to space research with NASA, that we were able to catch up and surpass them. How many millions or billions were wasted on commie-hunting in the early fifties before we realized by 1960 that we were behind them in the space race? Only our government officials know. Quite a waste of the taxpayer's money. Fortunately, the US has taken a much more sensible approach when it comes to maintaining our edge in international trade. Creating important microchip alliances with Japan (a former enemy) and the Netherlands is far more effective than wasting billions on spy schemes.

PLOT: Commy spies attempt to gain secrets.

a docu-drama style movie~ This starts as the FBI receive a hot trip about a Communist cell in Boston. WE see the newly arrived KGB contact played by Karl Stepanek who urges the spies to even more ruthless means to get secrets. Finley Currie as the Professor Kefer who is being black mailed by the spies with his son being captive in Berlin by the REDS. MADE with the cooperation of the FBI. Some of the men are actual FBI agents. BASED on story by J Edgar Hoover himself the Crime of the Century a short story in the Readers Digest. BETTER than I expected. Moves along very well and the ADDED "dedication" of the spies to the RED commy cause at times is comical and interesting. MADE at time of the RED SCARE (COMMUNIST) days of the 1950s. I give this 7 out of 10 for interesting COMMY spies inside the USA. Also recommend is the HOUSE on 92nd STREET.

WALK EAST ON BEACON! Is a thriller from 1952 that feels like it was made as a propaganda piece for the FBI. Hoover features in archive footage and from what we know about the communist witch hunts of the era it all feels more than a little queasy. The story involves the usual heroic troupe of FBI agents who are hunting for a sleeper cell of Russian agents working out of Boston. The cast are competent but the film sort of plods along at its own speed without ever truly engaging the senses or indeed the imagination. While it's nice to see a film not set in New York or Los Angeles for once, this really doesn't have all that much to offer.

Director Alfred L Werker stands as an indefatigable worker of B pics and he does not disappoint in WALK EAST ON BEACON! - a rather unusual title for a propaganda and FBI procedural piece.

Apart from the professional actor George Murphy and the rather biblical Finlay Currie (who played the part of Peter in QUO VADIS one year earlier) with a Russian or German accent, no known actors, but the action is riveting enough to remove any pressure from generally satisfactory and unassuming acting.

Good photography, tight and believable script (though I failed to grasp the repeated interest in the lady who walked with a "lope", nothing comes of it in the end) and pertinent voiceover.

No masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination, but interesting to watch as a capsule of a time when politics interfered with the life of citizens and everyone suspected everyone else of commie sympathies.

May the world never have to go through that again... now that Big Brother is watching everyone every minute of every day!

Know how I feel about film noir? Love it to death! To me, it's not so much a genre, more a way of life. The inescapable reality, however, is that in the natural, universal scheme of existence, there is inevitably a percentage of crud at the bottom of the barrel. Indeed, the grating noise of a barrel being scraped, would provide a pertinent soundtrack for this dreary movie.

'Walk East on Beacon!' is a truly dour, dull docu-noir. A movie entirely devoid of personality. There are no strong characters, smart one-liners or wittily deadpan ripostes. In short, a gaggle of good grey men seek to smoke out a gaggle of gruesome greyer men (and women), who, despite being on the same page, exude as much warmth as a Siberian snowstorm in their dealings with each other. The sole striking performance comes from Finlay Currie as the ageing, vulnerable scientific genius, who has defected to the U. S. and is anxious about the plight of his son in East Berlin. Currie is fairly sound, but this is no Abel Magwitch and hints of native Scottish can be detected within his generic Eastern European brogue.

If one scene personifies the movie's relentlessly lacklustre tone, it's a conference room adorned by a group of middle-aged, largely bespectacled Communists, glumly listening to a reel to reel tape recording of Currie waxing lyrical about his revolutionary, life changing breakthrough, at the end of which they exit, with the same blank, glum indifference.

Released when blacklisting was at its peak: As a tirade against the rising tide of Communism, it makes for pretty tedious viewing. A missed opportunity, a damp squib of a picture. Not so much a film noir, more a film gris!

This final installment in the Columbia Film Noir boxed sets from the 1940s and 1950s ends the otherwise fascinating and entertaining group of movies on a bum note. Was this a recruitment film for J. Edgar's FBI at the time? It sure as hell plays like one.

First off, the title has an exclamation point...watch out! There could be a sleeper cell of Soviet agents around every city corner! The acting and direction in this movie is bone dry. Ideas had already been used in earlier movies like Walk a Crooked Mile (itself not much of a classic, and part of the same Columbia box set that contains Walk East on Beacon!), and later, better movies like Hitchcock's Torn Curtain (and yes, even what's considered a weak Hitchcock film is more engrossing than Walk East on Beacon!)

No expose is given about why the Americans in this film became Soviet spies. The behind the scenes operations at the FBI play like instructional videos (was there really a "WFBI" radio station then?) Although the crux of the plot involving an apparent Holocaust survivor who fled to the U. S. to become a brilliant scientist to work on complex military formulas before the Soviets could do it has its moments, similar plots were explored better in the aforementioned films.

The ending of the movie is like a love letter to J. Edgar... it is utterly shameless. With the hindsight we have now about Hoover and how his red scare tactics destroyed thousands of American lives, most of action in this film is squirm inducing.

Watch it for how Boston looked in the early 1950s. This is one time when the "on location" reputation of Columbia Pictures at the time basically saves a movie.

This is a most conventional propaganda picture for the glory of the FBI with careful documentation of how expertly they handle their duties and get their commie villains. It is very similar in character to Henry Hathaway's "House on the 92nd Street", which though is a so much more interesting film for its characters, especially Signe Hssso. Here there are no characters except stereotypes.. The one character for which the film is worth seeing is Finlay Currie as the Russian scientist who gets into trouble, and his way of handling his very tricky path out of an immense abyss of trouble. It's not a bad film, but it is supremely superficial, varnished to 101% artificial perfection, but for Finlay Currie. who makes a great performance.

I'm old enough to barely remember to Red Scare, the McCarthy Era, etc. From the early 1950s, along with the classic "I Led Three Lives" TV series featuring Richard Carlson as the actual Herb Philbrick, Citizen, Spy and Counter-Spy for the FBI.

This is just a well-done story based on a book by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to cash-in on the hype and hysteria being created at the time to make a point for this or that self-serving political reason.

And let's all hear it for newscaster and esteemed Edward R. Morrow, not a part of this story or conclusion, who was instrumental in bringing McCarthy under control and the Red Scare Era into intelligent perspective and eventual demise.

But, anyway, this is a great movie for its time to showcase what folks were all talking about and feeling. The Commies are everywhere and out to take over our beloved Democracy and way of life.

We all know, propaganda - with shifting targets according to the years - has been at the core of U. S. (and other countries') mainstream film production from the very start. And we are all right with it, as long as it is treated with some delicacy, and, in the best cases, with some artistic goals in mind. Well, this is not the case for "Walk East on Beacon!", (1952, in the cold war era), where heroic FBI's members', as well as common citizens' efforts to counter the "red threat" are cast upon a plot lacking of whatsoever thrill. If you can stand all that, you should watch the film: an interesting specimen of its times' values. Be aware that the final scenes, as happens often in these movies, are quite concitated action shots in which is really difficult to tell what is really happening.

I'm very shy about the comparison that I now am proposing to you: an equally propagandistic film is 1959 Hitchcock's "North by Northwest". If you haven's seen it, please do, and you will understand what I mean.