Son roman d'amour

I would say, that I enjoyed this movie, to a certain extent..... Because, it was romantic, touching, and it starred Robert Montgomery...... One of my fave actors, from the golden age...... He, and Helen Hayes had pleasant chemistry in this movie...... Right beside, Joan Crawford, as his best leading ladies....... Their likable chemistry, almost managed to distract me, from how dated, and old fashioned this movie was..... Which is the main reason, why the film didn't succeed in all ways...... Also, there were poor, dull, dated performances, from the miscast actor, who played Ellis, Vanessa's insane husband, and the barmaid woman...... There were some parts, that were unnecessary for the story, and made no effect anyway....... For example, about Robert Montgomery marrying the barmaid woman..... Many situations happened too quickly, like when Vanessa gets angry w/ Benjie, and then forgives him so quickly....... The film could've been stretched longer...... Otherwise, for those who enjoy romance movies, this is worth a look...... I also look forward, to watching other Robert & Helen Hayes movies soon......

Helen Hayes and Robert Montgomery are two adorable people in love in the very old-fashioned melodrama Vanessa, Her Love Story. They're young and impulsive and they still believe in love-at least at the beginning of the movie. The beginning is wonderful, as they fall in love and become engaged. Then the drama shows up and turns it into a very heavy movie.

The night before their wedding, there's a fire in Helen's house. She's asleep and groggy, so Bob runs into the burning building and rescues her. He's too late to drag Helen's dad, Lewis Stone, out of the house, and Helen calls off the wedding. She vows to hate him forever, and while drowning his sorrows, Bob falls prey to a scheming barmaid and her father, Donald Crisp. That's not even half of the drama packed into this 75-minute movie, so if that sounds good to you, you'll want to rent this on a rainy afternoon. If you liked Splendor in the Grass, this movie is right up your alley. I'll watch anything with a young, handsome Robert Montgomery in it, so I was very entertained. I've seen thousands of old movies, so an overdose of melodrama doesn't bother me, but if you're not prepared for it, you'll find yourself saying, "Anything else?" halfway through. You'll also get a healthy dose of Helen Hayes, who gives a classically dramatic performance. You can imagine her hitting the back row of a theater, but since the story is so over-the-top, she doesn't really feel out of place.

So many great kings of old hollywood in here.. Montgomery ( heart-throb of the 1930s and 1940s), Helen Hayes (TWO oscars!), Lewis Stone (the stately older gentleman in Grand Hotel, and so many other films), Henry Stephenson (everyone's uncle or grandfather). Oscar nominated May Robson. Even Jessie Ralph made all those films with WC Fields. This is a story about bad timing.. .probably an experience we've ALL had in our lives; we fall for someone who isn't free at the time. or maybe it's ourself who isn't available, an opportunity missed and lost. and bagpipes. did I mention it takes place in Scotland, so of course there are bloody bagpipes. Moves along, if not very fast. It IS a period piece, after all. It starts well. but gets rather slow in the middle while "Benjie" is off to war... bad decisions. lost love. bad timing. This one shows up on Turner Classic now and then. Directed by William Howard; he had started in the silents in the 1920s, continued into the talkies. Story by Hugh Walpole, who had also written "Kind Lady" (both film versions!) Kind Lady is so much better than Vanessa..

SPOILER: This movie, now rated TV-PG, was shown as part of a kids matinee double bill at Peoples, a neighborhood theater in Dayton, Ohio, in 1935 or '36, to an audience whose average age was maybe 9.5 years. Though I was a year or two older, I didn't understand it. (I don't think I knew about adultery, for one thing.) It must have made an impression, because I remembered the theme that the woman couldn't divorce her insane husband to marry the man of her dreams. (I also remembered the theme song, "John Peel," but thought it was from another movie.) As part of my current movie viewing hobby, I enjoy finding these old latent memory pics, no matter how bad, and revisiting them. This one isn't all that bad. Poor Vanessa gets herself married to a man she really doesn't care much about, and when Mr. Right becomes available, the situation drives her unstable husband over the edge. Under Victorian British law, she cannot divorce a person who is insane, so she's stuck. Her "innocent" association (??? -- It must have been; these were the days of "the Code") with her true love caused local scandal, and she finally had to return to her husband and wait for him to die. In the end, however, she and her lover wind up singing "John Peel (with his coat so gay ...)" while watching the sun set over their favorite mountain. Actually a fairly good film, but not for 11-year-olds, even today.

Vanessa is an amazing film. Every actor is pitch perfect, the production values are top draw, yet the film fails to entertain. We have an opera with full audience, a garden party with hundreds, a horse parade with thousands, a fort in Egypt, mansions in various locations. This might have been MGM's most expensive film of 1935. We have Helen Hayes, perfect in the role as loving, long suffering, and duty bound. Her scenes with Otto Kruger are exceptional. Few pairings have been more affecting. I've written of Kruger's ability to do any acting task. Here he succeeds brilliantly. Montgomery is usually is a bit shallow for my taste. Here he is properly wild and stalwart. The rest of the cast is populated by wonderful character actors, doing their jobs particularly well, especially May Robson and Henry Stevenson. The large cast includes several favorites, including Violet Kemble Cooper, Ethel Griffies, and Lionel Belmore. Since everyone does their job so well, we must credit the director, William K. Howard, with an excellent job. Checking his filmography, I see no outstanding films, but a few good ones. It is difficult to imagine that MGM would entrust such a prestigious and expensive film to his care. And yet, the film ultimately disappoints. This is clearly the fault of the screen play. For a company like MGM to approve it, reflects badly on the studio. Of course, I'll watch it again, but only to see Hayes and Kruger working so brilliantly together.