A crooked nightclub owner, pretending to go straight, is forced to kill a henchman when the latter tries to run off with the gang's latest haul.A crooked nightclub owner, pretending to go straight, is forced to kill a henchman when the latter tries to run off with the gang's latest haul.A crooked nightclub owner, pretending to go straight, is forced to kill a henchman when the latter tries to run off with the gang's latest haul.
Budd Buster
- Deacon Fedder - Henchman
- (uncredited)
Ace Cain
- Insp. Bull
- (uncredited)
Jules Cowles
- Murder Witness
- (uncredited)
Murdock MacQuarrie
- Haskell - Silk's Lawyer
- (uncredited)
Dick Rush
- Detective Captain
- (uncredited)
Hal Taliaferro
- Insp. Swann
- (uncredited)
Ray Turner
- Men's Room Attendant
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
This early crime film starring Lon Chaney Jr. isn't too good. It's about a gangster who owns a nightclub and uses this as an alibi for the crimes he commits. It's a thoroughly uninspired movie, with little to recommend it. It's an early Chaney performance, so for his fans it at least provides an early glimpse of the man in action. Along with another early Chaney film from the same time, Scream in the Night, it doesn't offer too much though. He wasn't a star name at the time so he had to star in these old Poverty Row movies to help get his career moving I guess. The most distinctive thing about this production was probably the songs and the dance routines, which while not exactly special they did offer something different at least.
Early in his film career, Creighton Chaney wasn't especially successful or notable. However, against his wishes, he was re-christened 'Lon Chaney Jr.' by the studios and they began to place him in the leads-- hoping to capitalize on his father's notoriety in the 1920s and early 30s. Well, eventually he improved and was a decent actor--with such notable films as "Of Mice and Men" as well as "The Wolf-Man". "The Shadow of Silk Lennox" is from the period before he became a more accomplished actor--when the rough acting and super-low budgets were the norm for young Creighton.
The budget for this film from Commodore Pictures/Ray Kirkwood Productions was probably about $427.99 judging by the talent assembled for the movie. The biggest problem was the singing--which seemed pretty bad as well as used a lot as filler. As for the acting, it ranged from decent to poor--with no real stand outs. And when it comes to story, the film seems an awful lot like previous films like "Little Caesar", "The Public Enemy" and "Scarface"--just cheaper and less interesting.
The film find 'Silk' Lennox (Chaney) as a mob boss who claims, of course, to be a respectable businessman. Whenever he or his gang is involved in killings or robberies, he uses his lawyers as well as witness intimidation to insure that he'll keep getting away with his life of crime. In desperation, the G-men get involved and they are determined to capture Silk in the act. Will this happen? And, will we care?
My biggest problem about the movie, apart from the awful singing and lack of anyone I cared about in the least, was the whole Silk angle. Chaney kept saying 'smooth as silk' throughout the film and it just made him sound like an idiot. Not a great film by any stretch but he had done worse in some of his earlier movies--not that this is a glowing endorsement!
By the way, for you trivia nuts out there. James Cagney apparently NEVER said 'you dirty rat' in a film. However, Silk Lennox DID in this film!
The budget for this film from Commodore Pictures/Ray Kirkwood Productions was probably about $427.99 judging by the talent assembled for the movie. The biggest problem was the singing--which seemed pretty bad as well as used a lot as filler. As for the acting, it ranged from decent to poor--with no real stand outs. And when it comes to story, the film seems an awful lot like previous films like "Little Caesar", "The Public Enemy" and "Scarface"--just cheaper and less interesting.
The film find 'Silk' Lennox (Chaney) as a mob boss who claims, of course, to be a respectable businessman. Whenever he or his gang is involved in killings or robberies, he uses his lawyers as well as witness intimidation to insure that he'll keep getting away with his life of crime. In desperation, the G-men get involved and they are determined to capture Silk in the act. Will this happen? And, will we care?
My biggest problem about the movie, apart from the awful singing and lack of anyone I cared about in the least, was the whole Silk angle. Chaney kept saying 'smooth as silk' throughout the film and it just made him sound like an idiot. Not a great film by any stretch but he had done worse in some of his earlier movies--not that this is a glowing endorsement!
By the way, for you trivia nuts out there. James Cagney apparently NEVER said 'you dirty rat' in a film. However, Silk Lennox DID in this film!
Silk Lennox runs a nightclub which fronts for his illegal gangster activities. You can probably fill in the blanks because there's not much else to say, as this picture fails on almost every level. Lon Chaney,Jr. is the only professional connected with this amateurish production and seems trapped - he must have needed the money to appear in this, a picture in which he otherwise would not have been caught dead (no pun intended). And I'll bet he wished he could have turned into a werewolf.
The script is awful, the direction and editing are terrible and the acting is unbelievably bad. The only reason I give it such a high rating is for the musical numbers (remember, it's a night club), which are not at all bad and are surprisingly tuneful. The rest is predictable and uninteresting.
If it comes on TV, miss it. If it turns up in your DVD collection, skip it.
The script is awful, the direction and editing are terrible and the acting is unbelievably bad. The only reason I give it such a high rating is for the musical numbers (remember, it's a night club), which are not at all bad and are surprisingly tuneful. The rest is predictable and uninteresting.
If it comes on TV, miss it. If it turns up in your DVD collection, skip it.
Shadow of Silk Lennox, The (1935)
* 1/2 (out of 4)
Static gangster picture has Lon Chaney, Jr. leading a gang but his latest crime might just get him pinched even though he's trying to look legit by running a nightclub. This film has an ultra low-budget and it doesn't help matters that the main star was just getting his acting chops together and comes off pretty badly. The gunfights are all rather lame and boring and the musical numbers are even worse. For Chaney fans only.
You can find this film through various public domain labels.
* 1/2 (out of 4)
Static gangster picture has Lon Chaney, Jr. leading a gang but his latest crime might just get him pinched even though he's trying to look legit by running a nightclub. This film has an ultra low-budget and it doesn't help matters that the main star was just getting his acting chops together and comes off pretty badly. The gunfights are all rather lame and boring and the musical numbers are even worse. For Chaney fans only.
You can find this film through various public domain labels.
While I have a weak spot for any film Lon Chaney is in, this has to rate as one of the worst. Chaney plays Silk Lennox a night club owner and gangster who manipulates people and situations in order to have perfect alibi's for the crimes he commits.
I will survive bad movies if they at least move, but here is a film thats barely an hour long, that is so awfully slow that it feels like its nine or ten times long than its running time. The problem is not in the cast, which is game up and down the line, but rather in the direction which requires nothing from the camera other than to have it shoot what its pointed at, the sequences are staged in seeming long takes akin to something from the stage, and the action is unimaginative. The script is worse with some awful contrivances used to move the plot along.
I unfortunately subjected myself to this movie twice when a copy I had was damaged and I had to return it after watching only 20 minutes. When I watched the replacement I quickly realized that it was better not to know the end than have to struggle through this movie.
Don't let Silk steal your time.
I will survive bad movies if they at least move, but here is a film thats barely an hour long, that is so awfully slow that it feels like its nine or ten times long than its running time. The problem is not in the cast, which is game up and down the line, but rather in the direction which requires nothing from the camera other than to have it shoot what its pointed at, the sequences are staged in seeming long takes akin to something from the stage, and the action is unimaginative. The script is worse with some awful contrivances used to move the plot along.
I unfortunately subjected myself to this movie twice when a copy I had was damaged and I had to return it after watching only 20 minutes. When I watched the replacement I quickly realized that it was better not to know the end than have to struggle through this movie.
Don't let Silk steal your time.
Did you know
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- I skia tou Silk Lennox
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Shadow of Silk Lennox (1935) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer