Eye Without a Face

Seems the film. Is divisive which is interesting.

To me the film clearly effectively critiques incel culture and on line voyeurism in a genre context which I find very interesting and which some people do not seem to get . The lead Henry is clearly suffering from trauma and is portrayed as vulnerable but he is still an A 1 creep - I think Dakota Shapiro walks that tightrope really effectively and the score by Charlie Clouser keeps us unsettled throughout. The character played amusingly by Luke Cook is a real doofus and to some extent an exemplar of toxic masculinity but he also touches notes of real empathy with Henry . I think it is entertaining and effective .

Eye Without a Face (2021) is definitely not a good movie, but it's not nearly as bad as IMDB reviews claim it to be.

I love to watch films that feel like they were made by an alien or an AI. This one is very much like it. It appears that they didn't know how human beings operate and what real life is in general.

It gets quite hilarious at times, like some of the "tense" scenes are legit funny. You can't make this stuff up intentionally.

The acting was mostly the film's strongest point. The Australian struggling actor was either a very well played character or an actual real-life struggling actor who was well-cast for the role.

The production was very light. It feels like this film was very cheap and efficient. We only get a couple of rooms and a quick walk capture, that's all.

At times bits and pieces of social commentary pop here and there, which is cool, but the film isn't really about that, unfortunately.

I love how the main lead lives in a jhuggi-type house, and I surely know why he does. You know his "computer skills" are just so high because he turns off his monitor each time he leaves. Or maybe it's all the scissors and pliers on the wall, together with a pair of old TV circuit boards.

I know I'm just making fun of this, but it's better this way. Believe me. You don't even want to try to understand how this story is supposed to work.

This is one of those made for IFC TV movies. Recommended on Amazon and I have no clue why. It was bad.

About some guy who likes to watch women eat fruit on the internet. Bizarrely written and just pointless.

And IMDB seems to have added a large amount of required characters now in order to post a review. I'm sure they'll reverse this decision at some point because I'm sure a lot of people will be annoyed by it and complain. It really doesn't make a lot of sense.

Just like this non-entertaining movie!!!!

This is definitely one you can skip. I would give it a score now but I still have a few characters left!

Okay now is the time. 3/10.

Gimme a break, 3.5? At least solid 7. May be predictable, but still greatly executed!

Acting was great too, camera angles also.

Don't trust the 1 star reviews.

A shy young male recluse with a live-in male tenant finds relief in illegal all-day digital voyeurism. Eventually he suspects one of the beautiful young women he spies on of cannibalism. His gregarious actor tenant encourages him to come out of his shell, but that turns out to be the worst possible advice.

This might have been a much better movie had the film makers been allotted another half hour of running time and not felt obliged to wrap things up so precipitously. As it is, the film is nonetheless entertaining enough - thanks in large part to the protagonist's delectable objects of solicitude/desire. It makes no claim to be a cautionary tale, as voyeurism is its ultimate selling point.