First Lady

All the tropes lined up in order and no sensible motivation. Felt like a movie out of fil school. Amazing that it got funded This could have been fun but the script is so heavy handed it leaves no room for the audience.

Yes, it's meant to be gooey sweet and a modern fairy tale. But I only recognized one actor and using the term actor is an over statement! Most "actors" couldn't act in a third grade play AND the "come and go" fake accent is beyond ridiculous!

Come-on already!

We deserve better.

Our brains have currently turned to OATMEAL from watching too much TV during the pandemic, must the atrophy of our "grey matter" be accelerated by being proffered such second rate offerings??

Turn on some old, classic BLACK & WHITE shows and enjoy!!

In the current tense political atmosphere and with this being a Presidential election year, First Lady stands out as a charming, heartfelt breath of fresh air. Every character portrayal is spot-on; Corbin Bernsen is a romantically adorable King Max alongside Nancy Stafford, who plays the regal and compassionate FLOTUS, and the supporting cast members all fit their roles perfectly. With delightful repartee, the dialogue effervesces, and the romance beautifully rounds out this family-friendly, laugh-out-loud film. If you only see one movie this year, make it this one!

Going into the movie, despite only reading a brief synopsis, I had some hopes that this would be at least a decent romantic comedy. The widow of the President decides, to help her late husband's VP to win re-election, to run as his First Lady. It sounded like an interesting premise. Unfortunately, the film did not live up to those hopes... at all

When the production logo finished playing, a poorly rendered book appears on the screen with a cloudy sky background and my first thought was that it was another production company logo. Then the realization hit me that this was the start of the movie and my expectations came crashing down. What followed the opening narration was a poorly written slog of a film. For a comedy, it was not very amusing and if it was supposed to be political satire, it came off more as the writer not understanding how American Politics and Government works than an actual critique of the system. Even the claims of US History made by the protagonist, who is supposed to be a former History professor, did not make a lot of sense. The 'jokes' about the generation divide in the country didn't particularly land and just came off as the writer wanting to put buzzwords in to make the film sound relevant.

It's a shame that the film goes out of its way to be as apolitical as it can with characters who should have very big political views. This wouldn't be too much of a problem except for the whole plot point about the protesters not knowing what they were protesting because they were just being paid to protest. The whole resolution of that plot point should have been used when writing the actual film because as it stands, I see this film as one of those protesters, just standing there protesting not because they care about a certain political issue, but because they need to be paid.

The other big thing that bothered me had to do with the main love interest of the film and all of the costuming choices with him and everyone associated with him. He is supposed to be the king of a random country, but he doesn't even have the power to make sure his personal military guard don't look like a bunch of slobs? He doesn't even have the power to make them tuck in their ill-fitting button down shirts? I understand this movie didn't have much of a budget, but it doesn't even look like they even tried to make any of the costumes look anything but cheap. Not only do the costumes look cheap but the actual sets are very obviously just filmed in someone's house, to the point where you can not tell if a scene is taking place at the White House or some soccer moms living room. The lighting also suffers from looking cheap as well.

The big question I left with this movie was how it even ended up in the movie theater at all. If it wasn't for the fact that all of the characters were in their mid-30s and older, I would've sworn that this was just something that would've premiered on the Disney Channel. This film takes no chances and plays it safe on anything that would even come close to being controversial. Even the political issues that are brought up are so generic that its hard to even tell there's even a conflict to begin with. The film even goes so far as to tell you there's conflict between characters instead of actually showing you any conflict.

Ultimately, this film just plays off as a romantic comedy that doesn't know how to be funny... nor does it know how to tell a story. And in the end, all it is is a waste of time and space that should have gone to something that actually cares to tell a story.

There is no shortage of decent films with distinguished actors concerning the President of the United States, set in the White House and Capitol Building, such as 'Murder at 1600' (Wesley Snipes), 'Salt' (Angelina Jolie), 'Olympus has Fallen' (Gerard Butler and Morgan Freeman), 'White House Down' (Channing Tatum and Jamie Foxx) and 'The American President' (Michael Douglas and Annette Bening).

When you add illustrious television series such as 'The West Wing' (Martin Sheen), 'Veep' (Julia Louis-Dreyfus) and 'Designated Survivor' (Keifer Sutherland) to this list it amazes me that the US government can function at all with all the camera crews in those buildings!

Unfortunately for 'First Lady', the above set a high standard that this little film simply cannot compete with. The characters are vaguely drawn, the script is insipid and the actors barely make it out of first gear at any time. The most powerful man in the world wanders around like a lost sheep, the only three-dimensional character is a newsreader and there is a complete absence of sexual chemistry (this is a romance, yes?) between the two lead actors.

The White House security staff are portrayed as idiots, the secret service staff are portrayed as idiots and guess what the White House administrative staff are portrayed as!

Next time the producers should pick slightly more original locations and characters and not try to revisit ground that has been covered many times before and much more effectively.