User reviews

We caught this on Lifetime last night. The movie wasn't terrible but it was anything to write home about, either! Engaged couple meets rich groom's family and friends and bad stuff starts happening! Audrey Landers could have done way better but I suppose a weak script really doesn't help! Other actors are pretty unknown. Skip it.

A woman is swept off her feet and goes to her boyfriend's family home for the wedding. There she meets her future Mother in law played by the still beautiful Audrey Landers. And her future sister in law who was adopted and very close to her Brother. Something mysterious happened to his previous fiancé who burned to death. The story is promising for this kind of Lifetime thriller. It's not annoying but it's slow in the middle. Still want to see it to the end.

It's so bad it almost makes your eyes bleed. Nonsense storyline, terrible acting. Absolute rubbish.

When the EpiPen was found in the trash, nobody even questioned why it got there in the first place, doh, It was taken from her bag. The producers must think the public are really stupid.

Terrible acting, worse plot, good for background noise.

Lindsay Hartley, & Jason-Shane Scott are a great writing team. The movies they write always nail the Lifetime vibe.

Acting was so over the top. I'm pretty sure Ivy (Audrey Landers) is a drag queen. When she rang a bell instead of calling 911, I died. Pour it up!

🔪🔪🔪🔪 (4 Knives) 🍷🍷🍷 (3 glasses of wine required.)

So I get that LMN movies are meant to be very dramatic.... But they could have found someone else to play the adopted sister. She sounds like she is reading straight from her script.... Not to mention being super nasally.

This could actually have been a rather good movie. The actors aren't half bad, and the movie "looks" good. But how the people react and what they do in this movie is just ridiculous. First, the main man, who is supposed to be the man of the house, very straightforward, very dominating, someone that everybody relies on, he just freezes or even cries when anything happens. Then they happily go on boat rides even when the bride-to-be has made it clear that she can't swim. And why not enter a sauna that has a lock on the outside of the door? Like most saunas do, right? Not. And allergy to coconut? Yes, we show the cabinet where all coconut of the house has been put. And the final nail in the coffin, for me, was when the bride-to-be and her sister sits on the edge of the boat by the dock to talk about the bad or strange things that have happened, and they don't even see the clearly floating corpse of the murdered ex-fiancee right below them. I mean, you couldn't miss her even in the corner of your eye. Sigh. No, this has to get 1/10 from me, even less if I could give it. How did they even get this thing published? Doesn't anybody question anything in the movie making business, or do they actually think that most people who will watch it are totally stupid. What a total waste of time and money.

Well I tried thinking it had to get better as let's face it, there's no way it could get worse. WRONG. Rubbish storyline, terrible acting etc etc. Another couple of hours of my life that I'll never get back. Avoid at all costs.

I agree with ALL of the negative comments on here, but I would like to include the set, clothing and the groom to be!!! The set is SO TACKY!!! EVERYTHING is HORRIBLE! ! A tiger rug with the head and everything?!!! Come on! SO 70's! The brides dress?!! The dress is off white and the veil is bright white?!! The dress looks all used and abused like from a thrift store! TACKY! Audrey Landers dress and CLEAR heels?! SO 80's! She needs to go back to the set of Knott's Landing or what ever show she used to be on!!! And hubby to be Karl? He looks EXTREMELY sickly! It was VERY distracting! JUST SAY NO!

This movie should have been called "engaged to a beta-male mamma's boy". It is a sorry testament to women's propensity to put up with literally ANYTHING, as long as their suitor is rich. Sad. The woman who played the sister is currently taking a crash course in Spanish so she can appear in Mexican soap operas (which is the only place you can typically see that level of over-acting. Audrey Landers turned in a wonderful performance (as always).

The protagonist actually seems to be a decent actress. For her sake, I hope that this movie gets lost in a basement somewhere so she does not have to answer for it being in her filmography.

Borrowing some text from another reviewr.

As soon as the female protagonist reveals her coconut allergy, it is clear that this is going to be used to advance the plot. When her Epipen is found in the rubbish, no one really questions it.{ END }

So many of these thriller plots rely on a victim having A fatal reaction to one allergy or other. Yet the affected person keeps the antidote in their luggage, in their purse even a car. Why not on their person always at hand and less likely to be stolen ?

Am I the only one who finds this strange ?

Commenting on the story. The identity of the killer is telegraphed almost at the beginning of the film. So no surprise by the end