IMDb RATING
5.8/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
A teacher learns that her boyfriend is actually the prince of a small country called St Ives.A teacher learns that her boyfriend is actually the prince of a small country called St Ives.A teacher learns that her boyfriend is actually the prince of a small country called St Ives.
Donna Anita Quinn
- The Countess
- (as Donna Anita Nikolaisen)
Stephen Blind
- Guest at the royal ball
- (uncredited)
Christopher Livingstone
- Royal ball Guest
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
Jersey girl Sara DeMarco is a sweet, outgoing grade school teacher. She's been going out with Daniel for a year although she doesn't know anything about his family. He brings good news of his book getting published and then he proposes to her. The biggest surprise is that he's actually a prince and the heir to the throne of the small country of St Ives. His parents are not happy to have the commoner. Not only is she too casual with the help. Daniel would have to abandon his claim to the throne to marry her. When reminded of this, the sister Princess Fiona becomes much more supportive since she is next in the line of succession.
Sure this is Hallmark but I can't excuse weak work just for that. This is weak. On the positive side, Fiona Gubelmann is bubbly cute although bordering on annoying. She fits the role well and for the first half, this works well enough following the formula. It's a fun, often repeated Prince Charming fantasy. They don't have the cash to stage the needed extravagance. It's a poorer version of Downton Abbey. The problem starts with the manufactured stakes. There is no rooting interest for him to be King. He doesn't want it and she doesn't really want it for him. Other than tradition, there is nothing holding them to the throne. It should be his decision and it's actually annoying to have her decide for him. It's played as a great sacrifice but in reality, it's nothingness. It's telling that there is no villain in the movie because there are no stakes. The throne has to be something better to be an actual stake.
Sure this is Hallmark but I can't excuse weak work just for that. This is weak. On the positive side, Fiona Gubelmann is bubbly cute although bordering on annoying. She fits the role well and for the first half, this works well enough following the formula. It's a fun, often repeated Prince Charming fantasy. They don't have the cash to stage the needed extravagance. It's a poorer version of Downton Abbey. The problem starts with the manufactured stakes. There is no rooting interest for him to be King. He doesn't want it and she doesn't really want it for him. Other than tradition, there is nothing holding them to the throne. It should be his decision and it's actually annoying to have her decide for him. It's played as a great sacrifice but in reality, it's nothingness. It's telling that there is no villain in the movie because there are no stakes. The throne has to be something better to be an actual stake.
This Hallmark movie is predictable as are most Hallmark movies. As predictable as it is, I still enjoyed it and was glad I didn't pay attention to the awful ratings and watched it anyway.
This was a mediocre "royal" romance for me, which is too bad because it had a lot going for it. I enjoyed the cast with one exception the royal sister Fiona, I thought she was over played. My other big complaint was how the prince was written, it wasn't the actor as I have seen him in other things...including Reign, it was more the script which didn't give him many lines and had him appearing to be supportive but only in the privacy of just the two of them...silent when it really mattered. "Danny"/Daniël really needed a fire light under him. Do you love this girl or not?!?!?!
That annoyed me so much I couldn't enjoy the film.
New Jersey school teacher has a relationship with Danny the writer, only to discover when he proposes that he is a prince and heir to the thrown...but wait if he marries a commoner he can't be king unless his parents change the rules.
That annoyed me so much I couldn't enjoy the film.
New Jersey school teacher has a relationship with Danny the writer, only to discover when he proposes that he is a prince and heir to the thrown...but wait if he marries a commoner he can't be king unless his parents change the rules.
Not up to your standard. Made lead actress appear foolish. In this day and age women should not be portrayed this way.
Royally Ever after was a cute movie. It's nowhere near as horrible as other reviews state. I rather enjoyed it. It's your typical happy ever after Hallmark movie. You know what to expect from them and in the end, the hero and heroine always end up together. Was this inspired by Harry and Meghan? Yes and no. The commoner marrying royalty theme has been a common theme in romance novels and movies for decades. At least this movie was filmed in Ireland instead of a cheesy sound stage. The cinematography was great and the acting was decent. It you're looking for something light and flirty, this movie is a great choice.
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed at Markree Castle, Collooney, Ireland
- GoofsFor her duplicity in getting Sarah to call off her engagement to Danny, Princess Fiona could have been charged with interfering with the proper succession of a monarch and could, therefore, have been committing treason.
- ConnectionsReferences Cendrillon (1950)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Royally Ever After
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Je vais épouser un prince ! (2018) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer