IMDb RATING
7.0/10
1.3K
YOUR RATING
After rigorous testing in 1961, a small group of skilled female pilots are asked to step aside when only men are selected for the spaceflight.After rigorous testing in 1961, a small group of skilled female pilots are asked to step aside when only men are selected for the spaceflight.After rigorous testing in 1961, a small group of skilled female pilots are asked to step aside when only men are selected for the spaceflight.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Jacqueline Cochran
- Self - Pilot
- (archive footage)
Janey Hart
- Self - Pilot
- (archive footage)
Bernice Steadman
- Self - Pilot
- (archive footage)
- (as "B" Steadman)
Randy Lovelace
- Self - Doctor, Aerospace Medicine
- (archive footage)
Jerrie Cobb
- Self - Pilot
- (archive footage)
John Glenn
- Self - Mercury Astronaut
- (archive footage)
Gordon Cooper
- Self - Project Mercury Astronaut
- (archive footage)
Myrtle Cagle
- Self - Pilot
- (archive footage)
- (as Myrtle K Cagle)
Featured reviews
****PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU PASS JUDGMENT**** I've said it many times before, if Netflix does anything right, its the incredibly well made original documentaries and docu-series. As a history buff I enjoyed it, as a man raised by a feminist mother I found it harsh and hateful towards men. With incredible historical footage, well structured stories of the bad ass women's early lives and their work as pilots, questions about sexism of the time and how these women faced it. I definitely enjoyed this documentary, but I watched it with a person that had a problem with it. My mother was a bra-burning feminist of the 60's and 70's, and she told me she found the whole description of NASA as "a good old boys club" to be insulting, because she worked with the NASA branch in our city. She told me she found it offensive because the men didn't do this out of hate, that's just how history was, and there no reason to be angry about it, because as the documentary shows these amazing women and how they changed how women were seen in the workforce.
So putting aside the harsh and semi-hateful attitude towards men, as I said, the film, like other Netflix documentaries, is incredibly well paced and put together, you are taken along on a ride through the history of women pilots both civilian and military, from WW2 WASP's to the women in this documentary. The film calls into question the natural sexist state of the 1940's and 50's and how it was changed through the changing perception of what women were capable of. Not only the story was an interesting one, but all the archival footage was truly incredible to watch. From the female WASP's of World War 2, to the women plane racers of the early 50's, to the Space Race of the Cold War. All of the footage was very well preserved and a true treat for this history fan. All in all it was another great Netflix documentary, though some will find the insults about men in NASA to be insulting, like my feminist mother did. But I liked it, a lot!
So putting aside the harsh and semi-hateful attitude towards men, as I said, the film, like other Netflix documentaries, is incredibly well paced and put together, you are taken along on a ride through the history of women pilots both civilian and military, from WW2 WASP's to the women in this documentary. The film calls into question the natural sexist state of the 1940's and 50's and how it was changed through the changing perception of what women were capable of. Not only the story was an interesting one, but all the archival footage was truly incredible to watch. From the female WASP's of World War 2, to the women plane racers of the early 50's, to the Space Race of the Cold War. All of the footage was very well preserved and a true treat for this history fan. All in all it was another great Netflix documentary, though some will find the insults about men in NASA to be insulting, like my feminist mother did. But I liked it, a lot!
Interesting documentary. Liberals will be angered at the way these women were treated and inspired by their courage. Far right wing conservatives will be angry because they are knuckle-dragging reactionary maniacs. My takeaway is quite different from both American camps. I can't understand why these women continued to be patriotic to a society that treated them so badly and why they were somewhat disappointed when the first woman in space was Soviet and not American. I also question the sincerity and inclusiveness of the American bourgeois feminist movement. Documentaries like this point out the injustices of the American capitalist system, but they do not question the fundamental injustice of capitalism itself and of America's backward and reactionary nature. The Americans only did anything remotely progressive because the Soviets embarrassed them and they were forced to by their example as well as by burgeoning social movements and organized labor in the US.
The Space Race was not a game. Nor was it something in the far distant future. It was deadly serious, immediate, and with far-reaching geopolitical consequences in a world where the threat of global nuclear annihilation and totalitarian communism was very real, and where much of the world was made up of non-aligned, newly independent nations trying to decide whether to ally with the West or with Moscow. Demonstrating technological superiority in space was an important tool in swaying people & nations to side with us.
The stakes were high and the list of unknowns stretched beyond the horizon. Some of the early medical examinations and experiments foisted upon astronaut candidates were truly bizarre, because nobody really knew anything about space, or what to expect, or how zero gravity or radiation would affect the human body. So they essentially made stuff up and did everything they could think of to the astronaut candidates, including lots of cameras and metal probes in places where the sun don't shine. Imagine the awkwardness of including women in such invasive and seemingly pointless examinations. Imagine the self-limiting and self-censoring effect that would have had on the early doctors and program architects who were trying to navigate their way through completely unknown territory, trying to get astronauts prepared for space.
Virtually all the astronauts were military, and served as combat fighter pilots or test pilots or both. Why? because they: 1) understood mortal danger 2) understood chain of command 3) were accustomed to long, strenuous, invasive, harsh training regimens
NASA wasn't selecting from a pool of "men" but from the pool of "fighter/test pilot". Women were excluded not primarily (or only) because they were women but because they were CIVILIAN. Why? Because women generally were not part of military combat. Why? Because our culture wasn't (and still isn't) ok with shipping millions of women off to fight, kill, bleed, and die. Men, yes. Always.
Men have always been the expendable sex to be shipped off to kill and die. We dress it up in shiny ways to make it more palatable, with stuff about "honor" "duty" etc. but the brute fact is men are expendable, so they get to die. One of the consequences of this is that occasionally, this actually leads to a benefit and privilege, like prestige assignments such as the astronaut corps. When your mortal enemy suddenly has a commanding and existentially threatening lead in space (If they can launch satellites into space, they can launch nuclear warheads into space) and you need to quickly create a human space program in response, you draw from the most appropriate existing talent pool: fighter pilots & test pilots.
Viewed in its proper historical context, crying "boo sexism! men bad!" seems utterly myopic & narcissistic, and emblematic of a sheltered 21st century perspective that wants to re-frame Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo as some kind of entitlement program that women were unfairly and deliberately excluded from, rather than something the U.S. desperately needed to succeed. The space program didn't exist to make astronauts feel good, fulfilled, and self-actualized. Astronauts were selected, trained, and used as guinea pigs so that the space program could succeed. Before asking "why weren't women *allowed* to be in the space program?", one must first ask "why weren't millions of women *allowed* to be drafted against their will to fight, kill, bleed and die, and to be used as guinea pigs in dangerous programs since time immemorial?"
The stakes were high and the list of unknowns stretched beyond the horizon. Some of the early medical examinations and experiments foisted upon astronaut candidates were truly bizarre, because nobody really knew anything about space, or what to expect, or how zero gravity or radiation would affect the human body. So they essentially made stuff up and did everything they could think of to the astronaut candidates, including lots of cameras and metal probes in places where the sun don't shine. Imagine the awkwardness of including women in such invasive and seemingly pointless examinations. Imagine the self-limiting and self-censoring effect that would have had on the early doctors and program architects who were trying to navigate their way through completely unknown territory, trying to get astronauts prepared for space.
Virtually all the astronauts were military, and served as combat fighter pilots or test pilots or both. Why? because they: 1) understood mortal danger 2) understood chain of command 3) were accustomed to long, strenuous, invasive, harsh training regimens
NASA wasn't selecting from a pool of "men" but from the pool of "fighter/test pilot". Women were excluded not primarily (or only) because they were women but because they were CIVILIAN. Why? Because women generally were not part of military combat. Why? Because our culture wasn't (and still isn't) ok with shipping millions of women off to fight, kill, bleed, and die. Men, yes. Always.
Men have always been the expendable sex to be shipped off to kill and die. We dress it up in shiny ways to make it more palatable, with stuff about "honor" "duty" etc. but the brute fact is men are expendable, so they get to die. One of the consequences of this is that occasionally, this actually leads to a benefit and privilege, like prestige assignments such as the astronaut corps. When your mortal enemy suddenly has a commanding and existentially threatening lead in space (If they can launch satellites into space, they can launch nuclear warheads into space) and you need to quickly create a human space program in response, you draw from the most appropriate existing talent pool: fighter pilots & test pilots.
Viewed in its proper historical context, crying "boo sexism! men bad!" seems utterly myopic & narcissistic, and emblematic of a sheltered 21st century perspective that wants to re-frame Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo as some kind of entitlement program that women were unfairly and deliberately excluded from, rather than something the U.S. desperately needed to succeed. The space program didn't exist to make astronauts feel good, fulfilled, and self-actualized. Astronauts were selected, trained, and used as guinea pigs so that the space program could succeed. Before asking "why weren't women *allowed* to be in the space program?", one must first ask "why weren't millions of women *allowed* to be drafted against their will to fight, kill, bleed and die, and to be used as guinea pigs in dangerous programs since time immemorial?"
Listless and artless and toneless. Nice artwork though.
5/4/18. Interesting to watch, from a historical perspective. it is sad and a tragedy that these women didn't get a chance to go into space because of the sexual discrimination at the time. Reasons for denying them the chance now seem totally preposterous. However, the interviews of these women probably could have been done better.
Did you know
- TriviaAstronaut Eileen Collins was first woman and American Space Shuttle pilot and later, the first Space Shuttle Commander. She logged four missions into Space on the Space Shuttle. She is the winner of the prestigious Harmon Trophy and has spent 38 days 8 hours and 20 minutes in outer space. She is a retired USAF Colonel and test pilot.
- GoofsReversed image. At 39:59 a TH-55 (Hughes 269) U.S. Army trainer hovers by the camera from left to right. The collective control is clearly visible in what appears to be the pilot's right hand. The collective is on the pilots left and thus the image must be reversed.
- ConnectionsReferenced in For All Mankind: Nixon's Women (2019)
- How long is Mercury 13?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Меркурий 13
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 18 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content