After a lost battle, Kim Ho, a once-proud swordsman for the king, is suddenly reappointed as a lowly prison guard. Working overnight on his first day, he runs headlong into an attempted pris... Read allAfter a lost battle, Kim Ho, a once-proud swordsman for the king, is suddenly reappointed as a lowly prison guard. Working overnight on his first day, he runs headlong into an attempted prison break.After a lost battle, Kim Ho, a once-proud swordsman for the king, is suddenly reappointed as a lowly prison guard. Working overnight on his first day, he runs headlong into an attempted prison break.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I loved the story and the fight scenes are awesome.
There are some minor things like Lee In-Jwa, who fought well in the prison but the last action was in my opinion not credible, as if he didn't have fighting abilities.
Overall an action movie to discover!
The plot is messy, but the cast works hard to overcome the gaps and goofs. I stayed with it for Jung Hae In, whom I've never seen as a bad-ass super hero before. He's wonderful, and I would like to see him in more action roles along with his sweet RomCom characters.
Love Jung Hae-in, a favorite, as I work through his Kdramas. Nice seeing him in a period pieces & being his badass best. I am enjoying him in more kinds of roles. The cast shows a great many actors that I am getting very familiar with from other dramas. His work seems to gather really good character actors in supporting roles. His acting skills have made him one of my very favorite actors. The settings were rich and lovely, too. Watching Kdramas are becoming a guilty pleasure while trudging on the treadmill. I hope to see more of Mr. Jung in further period based Kdramas, romcoms and the like!!
Excellent movie👍! Don't miss it..
During the Joseon dynasty Kim Ho (Jung Hae-in) is without a job. When he finally gets a job it's not really the one he had in mind. He is appointed as a prison guard. One of the inmates is the traitor Lee In-jwa (Kim Ji-hoon), who has started a rebellion against king Yeong-jo (Ryu Tae-joon). Lee believes to be in the right since Yeong-jo has killed his own brother in order to ascend the throne. Lee's subordinates plan to free the rebel leader and eventually assault the prison. They kill everyone, but they didn't expect to run into someone like Kim Ho. The boy turns out to be an exceptional swordsman. However, since the men around Lee are also excellent warriors Lee manages to escape and Kim is badly hurt. He manages to get into the Royal Palace to warn the king's counsel about the commencing rebellion. Yet, Lee has also allies at the Royal Court and so Kim barely manages to get away with his life. Apparently, the queen is involved in the rebellion as well. Kim doesn't really have an interest in the political schemes, but now just wants to take out Lee because he had his prison stormed. A deadly fight follows, in which the future of the country is at stake, too.
A conceptually interesting movie, that fails in its tone, pacing and believability. The fight choreography is competent but sadly adds to the aforementioned problems.
The initial tone might make you expect a comedy, something light-hearted or maybe a "dramedy". Characters are introduced as seemingly goofy and useless. I assume it's done to subvert expectation and surprise viewers with the coming events. The idea seems good to me, but isn't executed to best effect. The first 15 minutes made me feel like watching an episode of a very generic TV series with failing humor, but somewhat intriguing characters.
Once the action begins, everything seems a lot more promising. The fights favor flashiness over authenticity and there's a few too many edits, with the camera jumping around, mid-action. Yet, the action looks fairly good, featuring decent movie martial arts, and all moves are readable despite the editing. It's fun to watch, at least for the time it stays believable. Here's where pacing and plausibility get in the way, though. On a very theoretical level, it might seem sufficient to just have a well choreographed fight sequence, for entertainment. Like a boxing match or MMA cage fight. That works in sports for a couple of reasons. The primary one probably being that the specific audience has an interest in that specific type of fighting style. In a movie, it's generally smarter and a lot more efficient when the individual fights themselves tell a small story that the viewer can relate to, rather than just to have a fight where opponents exchange blows until winner and loser are defined. Jackie Chan understands this element perfectly. His choreography always has more to get invested in and it's not exclusively humorous.
The Age of Blood does little to make the fights relatable and takes a clumsy approach at trying to create tension. It's putting all of its weight onto the assumption that the audience wants to see the underdog win. That concept loses impact when there are sequences where you might be left wondering why characters are even fighting, when there were reasonable options to avoid conflict. After several of those incidents, the movie begins running on empty. The protagonist's motivation is so unclear that he even questions himself, at some point. And the story does not have enough substance to support repetitive action without tension.
Considering how the movie starts, character development could have been a saving grace. But although we learn more about the characters, they never seem to change along the way. What's left is a sequence of decent action scenes with lacking focus, intriguing characters played by competent actors and a thin story, based on real events. Enough for some mild entertainment, but hardly memorable.
Props to the stunt/action team, including all participating actors, though! They did great work for what I assume was a relatively low budget.
The initial tone might make you expect a comedy, something light-hearted or maybe a "dramedy". Characters are introduced as seemingly goofy and useless. I assume it's done to subvert expectation and surprise viewers with the coming events. The idea seems good to me, but isn't executed to best effect. The first 15 minutes made me feel like watching an episode of a very generic TV series with failing humor, but somewhat intriguing characters.
Once the action begins, everything seems a lot more promising. The fights favor flashiness over authenticity and there's a few too many edits, with the camera jumping around, mid-action. Yet, the action looks fairly good, featuring decent movie martial arts, and all moves are readable despite the editing. It's fun to watch, at least for the time it stays believable. Here's where pacing and plausibility get in the way, though. On a very theoretical level, it might seem sufficient to just have a well choreographed fight sequence, for entertainment. Like a boxing match or MMA cage fight. That works in sports for a couple of reasons. The primary one probably being that the specific audience has an interest in that specific type of fighting style. In a movie, it's generally smarter and a lot more efficient when the individual fights themselves tell a small story that the viewer can relate to, rather than just to have a fight where opponents exchange blows until winner and loser are defined. Jackie Chan understands this element perfectly. His choreography always has more to get invested in and it's not exclusively humorous.
The Age of Blood does little to make the fights relatable and takes a clumsy approach at trying to create tension. It's putting all of its weight onto the assumption that the audience wants to see the underdog win. That concept loses impact when there are sequences where you might be left wondering why characters are even fighting, when there were reasonable options to avoid conflict. After several of those incidents, the movie begins running on empty. The protagonist's motivation is so unclear that he even questions himself, at some point. And the story does not have enough substance to support repetitive action without tension.
Considering how the movie starts, character development could have been a saving grace. But although we learn more about the characters, they never seem to change along the way. What's left is a sequence of decent action scenes with lacking focus, intriguing characters played by competent actors and a thin story, based on real events. Enough for some mild entertainment, but hardly memorable.
Props to the stunt/action team, including all participating actors, though! They did great work for what I assume was a relatively low budget.
- How long is The Age of Blood?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Age of Blood
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $149,935
- Runtime1 hour 42 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Yeokmo - Banranui sidae (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer