179 reviews
I just finished binge watching this. It starts off slow as the story unravels its characters. It seems like a pretty simple whodunnit, but its not. The characters are flawed and have dark pasts which interweave beautifully with the main plot and just when you think you have it all worked out.... another bread crumb appears and like Hansel and Gretel you cant help yourself... You follow. I wont give anything away, but i hope they do a season 2... Special appearance by one of my favourite Game of Thrones characters and the acting is superb
- Hallelujah289
- Jun 18, 2021
- Permalink
To the person who reviewed this and didn't even watch it. You base your review on the plot description, you people are ruining IMBd for everyone else. Please don't review titles if you have not even watched it. Good start to this show.
- bentleyfold
- Oct 17, 2019
- Permalink
This show has been very up and down by pretty much every metric. The pace seems to speed up and slow down, with long stretches of very little happening but then new developments frantically thrown into the mix. I understand the producers crammed two books into one series which accounts for the weird pacing, and two investigations happening (which gets confusing and they bog each other down). The script also had some well-written funny moments, but then the very next scene will feature horrible dialogue.
Hard to blame the actors, who do a good job in the main, but a lot of their emotions seem turned up to 11 all the time, which is exhausting and not hugely realistic.
The characters' behaviour is downright bizarre at times. Coppers lose their rag constantly and seem to have no idea how to run an investigation that is remotely effective or follows any kind of professional standards. The plotting is also all over the place and requires some pretty major suspension of disbelief over daft left turns and enormous coincidences.
All that said, I find myself needing to watch the final episode to see if they can wrap it all up in a way that isn't either a total cop-out or just a daft resolution that comes out of left field.
- citizenstrane
- Nov 4, 2019
- Permalink
I really do not understand the negative reviews here. I may be a little biased as I am a Tana French fan and find her books some of the best crime novels around at the moment. However, I am not a Sarah Phelps fan after the mess she made of the Javier Falcon novels when she adapted those for TV. In this case, though, she seems to be on to something. The books are slow burners with a psychological tinge that eats into the dialogue and sets up the characters and their relationships. The relationship between Rob and Cassie is rendered pretty well.
They have also included a couple of things that are not in the book that seem to work well. Frank stalking Cassie is a logical way to link to the next instalment and a great way to introduce a wonderful character.
Well, two episodes in and it all looks good to me. For those that are looking for a standard police thriller kind of thing, don't bother. It was not written that way and the TV show looks pretty close to the book, so far. For those that like twisted, heart-wrenching, psychological drama, stay with it. I can already see that this is going to stay pretty close to what the author intended.
- dalescotbates
- Oct 16, 2019
- Permalink
Irish folklore: check
Whodunnit: check
Complex characters: check
Twisty romance: check
Cop banter: check
Awesome accents: double check
This was really good, watch it - don't listen to the negative reviews.
This was really good, watch it - don't listen to the negative reviews.
If I hadn't recently read both books I think this would have been even more confusing. This series takes liberal adaptations in order to shoehorn both stories concurrently into one series. There is a nice symmetry between the storylines, of abandoned children and the aftermath. And loss.
I'm a big fan of Tana French, especially "The Likeness" so I'll focus on that story line; I enjoyed seeing how others envision the characters, and above all, that manor house of Whitethorn. The novel lets you worm your way into Lexie's head and it's seductive. However, film gives us those atmospheric images of Ireland: lush green, dark and sinister woods, and that manor house. The dialog, the Irish slang and accents are terrifiic; fast, sharp, and wickedly smart.
Read the books, especially "The Likeness."
I'm a big fan of Tana French, especially "The Likeness" so I'll focus on that story line; I enjoyed seeing how others envision the characters, and above all, that manor house of Whitethorn. The novel lets you worm your way into Lexie's head and it's seductive. However, film gives us those atmospheric images of Ireland: lush green, dark and sinister woods, and that manor house. The dialog, the Irish slang and accents are terrifiic; fast, sharp, and wickedly smart.
Read the books, especially "The Likeness."
- mccann3010
- Feb 21, 2021
- Permalink
I watched the entire first season. I consider myself to be of above-average intelligence, and I have virtually no idea what happened.
It seemed to be much to do about nothing. One story involves some teenage bullies chasing some kids in the woods. The other involves some overaged college students living as housemates in a mansion. I don't understand the connection. Since the woods-chase thing happened 21 years prior.
Our male protagonist has been through a lot of emotional pain. He has a dark outlook on life. The actor plays it as well as anyone could. He successfully instills a film noir mood to the story. That's what kept me in the game.
The female lead is oddly attractive and has a complex back story herself. I don't know what season it was, but the atmosphere is very grey and dreary.
But at the end of the day, one need be a good storyteller to gain my respect with a script, and this one didn't. It was too long, filled with flashbacks, and supposed intertwining that you'll find difficult to unpack.
There is no substitute for a good and well-told story.
It seemed to be much to do about nothing. One story involves some teenage bullies chasing some kids in the woods. The other involves some overaged college students living as housemates in a mansion. I don't understand the connection. Since the woods-chase thing happened 21 years prior.
Our male protagonist has been through a lot of emotional pain. He has a dark outlook on life. The actor plays it as well as anyone could. He successfully instills a film noir mood to the story. That's what kept me in the game.
The female lead is oddly attractive and has a complex back story herself. I don't know what season it was, but the atmosphere is very grey and dreary.
But at the end of the day, one need be a good storyteller to gain my respect with a script, and this one didn't. It was too long, filled with flashbacks, and supposed intertwining that you'll find difficult to unpack.
There is no substitute for a good and well-told story.
It's a very complex, multi layered mystery, there are lots of strands, and lots of jumping back in forth in time, so don't think you can watch this and fiddle with your phone, you have to concentrate as you could easily lose it.
It isn't going to be for everyone, because it is dark, it's bleak, and does contain some very tough to watch scenes. It has been criticised for being ambiguous, but I would argue that all loose ends are tied up, the last scene provides a lot of answers.
The only real dip comes in Part 6, the only episode I didn't like, the best, the following episode, as so often, it's the penultimate episode that I enjoyed most of all.
Terrific acting, Sarah Greene and Killian Scott are both incredible, they are well supported by a great cast.
I'm someone that always loves a continuation of a series, but in this instance I'd be disappointed if they brought it back, this needs to be left alone. Gripping, 8/10
It isn't going to be for everyone, because it is dark, it's bleak, and does contain some very tough to watch scenes. It has been criticised for being ambiguous, but I would argue that all loose ends are tied up, the last scene provides a lot of answers.
The only real dip comes in Part 6, the only episode I didn't like, the best, the following episode, as so often, it's the penultimate episode that I enjoyed most of all.
Terrific acting, Sarah Greene and Killian Scott are both incredible, they are well supported by a great cast.
I'm someone that always loves a continuation of a series, but in this instance I'd be disappointed if they brought it back, this needs to be left alone. Gripping, 8/10
- Sleepin_Dragon
- Nov 19, 2019
- Permalink
This series started out really strong with great character development and an intriguing and unique story line.
That plot remains interesting throughout, however, about half way through the series a second story line is introduced that runs concurrently. I found it very silly and unnecessary with the need to completely suspend belief. The links between the two stories was weak.
It wasn't a bad show, just some poor decision making to combine two seperate book storyline's into one series that took some of the shine off its appeal.
Overall I would score it 6.5 out of 10. It would have been a 7 had there been more focus..
That plot remains interesting throughout, however, about half way through the series a second story line is introduced that runs concurrently. I found it very silly and unnecessary with the need to completely suspend belief. The links between the two stories was weak.
It wasn't a bad show, just some poor decision making to combine two seperate book storyline's into one series that took some of the shine off its appeal.
Overall I would score it 6.5 out of 10. It would have been a 7 had there been more focus..
First episode in and what a start. This has all the makings of a IMDB top 250 show.
For realists only, this series may require some viewer patience while the complexities of the plot and the characters are developed. One of a kind...so far.
I eagerly look forward to more of this ambitious, entertaining series.
9/10
I eagerly look forward to more of this ambitious, entertaining series.
9/10
A good story with a good cast, but, why does it have to be so slow? Have watched 6 episode's now and still we keep seeing the same cut backs and are struggling to advance, please don't spoil something for the same of making it longer.
- oldfield-simon
- Nov 1, 2019
- Permalink
- info-996-828544
- Nov 5, 2019
- Permalink
I have watched over 30 Such Shows. They all share common things apart from murder and mystery. This was no different with vulnerable cops with a past and ties to murder investigation. Starts off as a regular who killed the Girl found in the woods. Then after 1st Episode just drags on. Past, Demons inside Head, etc.
There are some really good moments in between but something seems off. Show really redeems itself in last 2 Episodes. To an extent that there is a Shock value and disbelief coupled by some really great acting. Good editing could have made it a more compact 6 Episodes. Its the last 2 hours that make the show worth watching. Production Values are good. Acting is top notch. The Police Chief(Varys from GoT) is excellent. There's tonnes of Irish-English banter and some cracking one-liners. The atmosphere is mostly dark. The leads pull off a good performance but the lady cop character is bit off a let down. Apart from that Show is worth watching if you know how to skip meaningless content in between
Dublin Murders is not that dissimilar to True Detective season 3. Both are about missing children where one child survives. I haven't seen TD through to the end so I can't be definitive about the similarities, but I certainly found watching both to be a very rewarding experience (True Detective is HBO). True Detective is slower. I didn't find Dublin Murders slow at all, and wondered why a lead reviewer here at IMDb would claim that. The pace is awesome, and always interesting. Both series rely on flashbacks, but in TD it is more about the detectives, whereas in DM it is more about the children, though the detectives certainly have a large share of the flashbacks. I suspect both series throw a large number of red herrings about, certainly DM does. Don't let that dissuade you though, Dublin Murders is very clever writing indeed, in fact, I haven't seen anything quite like it. What I liked about both series is that despite both being believers in the modern trend that detectives' lives are more interesting and important than the actual victims (so irritating!!), in both shows these lives are genuinely interesting rather than cliched in terms of marriages, secrets and past trauma. The lead man in DM is a clever character study. You'll love him, then hate him, then find sympathy again. The lead woman is one of the strongest depictions of a strong woman I've yet seen, and a credit to a portrait of Irish femininity. In terms of the pace, one might note that DM is about three crimes, and all are riveting and tension-generating mysteries. Great performances, great casting, great writing, great production. Definitely not slow!!!
- robertemerald
- Jan 6, 2021
- Permalink
This was all over the place, very hard to stay engaged and follow as the characters seemed under developed or over developed on things no one cared about, maybe due to being kind of limited. I was kind of disappointed, I will say that the casting is pretty good.
- stephen-99398
- Dec 26, 2020
- Permalink
Like some of the other reviewers, I am surprised at the very negative reviews which don't seem to match the programme I watched unless people were so busy multi screening on youtube and answering their emails that they missed half the show as didn't seem to have any more characters than any other modern crime show. Visually stunning, great acting and interesting sharp writing.
- kmcheeseman-50005
- Oct 25, 2019
- Permalink
- brandon-reed08
- Mar 24, 2021
- Permalink
Great show that falls apart with flat anti-climatic ending. Acting was superb throughout.
- niallmulligan
- Dec 25, 2019
- Permalink
- darabrady-50511
- Oct 16, 2019
- Permalink
There are a lot of different elements to Dublin Murders, from the mystical to issues of identity.
Identity is explored within (crazy) families, between twins and their siblings, and with regard to survivors as a result of traumatic experience. Cassie and Rob share troubled childhoods and a lifelong search for acceptance that spearheads the theme. With these people never escape grief, and the detectives find in each other kindred souls and understanding they've craved but never found with anyone else. All in all worth it seeing.
Identity is explored within (crazy) families, between twins and their siblings, and with regard to survivors as a result of traumatic experience. Cassie and Rob share troubled childhoods and a lifelong search for acceptance that spearheads the theme. With these people never escape grief, and the detectives find in each other kindred souls and understanding they've craved but never found with anyone else. All in all worth it seeing.
- antoniotierno
- Jun 2, 2021
- Permalink
This gets you hooked from the first episode. I just wish it was released as a whole as I hate waiting for each episode. One of the best shows on tv in a long time. Brilliant cast. Killian Scott has been in a few shows I've seen and he is fantastic in this as well. Hope there's more than one season.
- gundagunda2004
- Jan 6, 2020
- Permalink
A good start but it became apparent that this was really two unconnected plots shoehorned together. I note from the credits it was based on two books and this seemed to come through quite clearly in the TV adaptation.
In the end the show dabbled with some supernatural elements but never had the courage to develop them or the writing to develop plot points that otherwise stretched all credulity. The suspension of disbelief was overcome by a sense of annoyance & the ending was an unsatisfactory cop out with both plot lines left with significant gaps. It was atmospheric & technically well put together but ultimately the writing wasn't strong enough. There were also far too many flashbacks which became intrusive & seemed like unnecessary padding.
- brianlewis-04701
- Nov 6, 2019
- Permalink