Gunned down in the snowy wilderness and desperate for shelter, Billy Cavanagh is taken in by kooky old lady Agnes, unaware that her isolated log cabin is being stalked by a bloodthirsty skin... Read allGunned down in the snowy wilderness and desperate for shelter, Billy Cavanagh is taken in by kooky old lady Agnes, unaware that her isolated log cabin is being stalked by a bloodthirsty skinless creature hellbent on getting inside.Gunned down in the snowy wilderness and desperate for shelter, Billy Cavanagh is taken in by kooky old lady Agnes, unaware that her isolated log cabin is being stalked by a bloodthirsty skinless creature hellbent on getting inside.
Kate Speak
- Lillian Carver
- (as Kate Davies-Speak)
Richard D. Myers
- Pete
- (as Richard Myers)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Reads summary, sees movie, in the famous words of Arnold Schwarzenegger, "You lie!"
I know a horror movie should be suspenseful, building itself up to reveal the monster or whatever in a climax then get a good ending out of it, but to mislead their audience to do ruins the experience and feels completely cheap. It sure is much more cheaper than the movie's special affects that is for sure. The acting is awful, the main character to be completely overtaken by the "monster" is... it does not make any sense. Physically it does not make sense, but it has to be put there or else the story won't continue forward. Deus ex machina event right there to the extreme.
If I were to see the movie without reading any summary, I wouldn't be as mad as I am right now since the plot in the movie is completely different than what the summary says. They hoodwinked me, skinned me before my eyes into watching this lie of a film.
The real summary should have been like "Hunters looking for serial killer gets separated in the cold of winter and encounters something they weren't prepared for." Was that so hard to think of? And the cover art for the movie should be replaced too to avoid the lies and confusion the movie causes too. I expected skinless monsters not this crap.
TL;DR: The whole summary of the movie is a lie and the movie itself is as bad too, save yourself the time to do something else. The director of this disaster deserves to be banned from the movie business. Hell, all this lying makes them great to be a politician.
I know a horror movie should be suspenseful, building itself up to reveal the monster or whatever in a climax then get a good ending out of it, but to mislead their audience to do ruins the experience and feels completely cheap. It sure is much more cheaper than the movie's special affects that is for sure. The acting is awful, the main character to be completely overtaken by the "monster" is... it does not make any sense. Physically it does not make sense, but it has to be put there or else the story won't continue forward. Deus ex machina event right there to the extreme.
If I were to see the movie without reading any summary, I wouldn't be as mad as I am right now since the plot in the movie is completely different than what the summary says. They hoodwinked me, skinned me before my eyes into watching this lie of a film.
The real summary should have been like "Hunters looking for serial killer gets separated in the cold of winter and encounters something they weren't prepared for." Was that so hard to think of? And the cover art for the movie should be replaced too to avoid the lies and confusion the movie causes too. I expected skinless monsters not this crap.
TL;DR: The whole summary of the movie is a lie and the movie itself is as bad too, save yourself the time to do something else. The director of this disaster deserves to be banned from the movie business. Hell, all this lying makes them great to be a politician.
This movie is slow moving and not worth the time to even watch the trailer. This movie is a worthless pathetic wannabe thriller, and or horror movie or what ever it's trying to be. This movie is a waste of 85 minutes of your time. Even the dialogue is pathetic. I can't believe someone actually financed the making of this movie. The only good part of this movie is seeing the end credits so that I can make a notation of the people's names that were involved in making this movie; so that in the future I can make sure to avoid watching anything that they produce.
As I sat down here in 2021 to watch the 2018 movie "Winterskin", I wasn't sure what I was getting myself into, as I hadn't even heard about writer and director Charlie Steeds' movie. But with its title and it being a horror movie, of course I opted to watch it.
The storyline told in "Winterskin", as written by Charlie Steeds, fell quite short of providing me with much of any entertainment. So I didn't really enjoy the movie, and made it about halfway through before giving up out of sheer boredom and a lack of interest in the movie entirely.
The movie was just too slow paced for my liking and the storyline was just downright bland and boring. And it didn't really help much that the character gallery was pretty uninteresting, and the dialogue was pretty wooden and rigid.
For a horror movie then "Winterskin" just didn't have what it took to impress or entertain me. So this is hardly a movie that I would recommend you waste your time, money or effort on.
My rating of "Winterskin" lands on a very generous two out of ten stars.
The storyline told in "Winterskin", as written by Charlie Steeds, fell quite short of providing me with much of any entertainment. So I didn't really enjoy the movie, and made it about halfway through before giving up out of sheer boredom and a lack of interest in the movie entirely.
The movie was just too slow paced for my liking and the storyline was just downright bland and boring. And it didn't really help much that the character gallery was pretty uninteresting, and the dialogue was pretty wooden and rigid.
For a horror movie then "Winterskin" just didn't have what it took to impress or entertain me. So this is hardly a movie that I would recommend you waste your time, money or effort on.
My rating of "Winterskin" lands on a very generous two out of ten stars.
Sooo much potential. Good concept, decent screenplay, well directed. All nearly sunk by one of the most over the top, overwrought, "what the hell is she thinking" performances of all time from Rowena Bentley. Recast that role - or even dial her back 2 or 3000 notches - and this would have been seriously great fun. Even with her insane hysterics it's a fun watch.
This movie could have been a blockbuster, if Bentley's role was played by Kathy Bates. Now, don't get me wrong, Rowena Bentley is a superb actress, but in my opinion, not for this part. Southern accent just did not fit her, neither did her make-up. Although a lot of effort was given to produce this movie, sad to say, just did not grab me.
- How long is Winterskin?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 24 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content