A down-on-his-luck man must help a self-absorbed ghost finish his last request so he can ascend to Heaven.A down-on-his-luck man must help a self-absorbed ghost finish his last request so he can ascend to Heaven.A down-on-his-luck man must help a self-absorbed ghost finish his last request so he can ascend to Heaven.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Luka Paul
- Cleaner #2
- (as Luka Bayani)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
One of those goofy-humor, clichéd but still entertaining plot lines, sprinkled with bits of originality here and there. Self-absorbed Eddie fails his girlfriend, who leaves him. Eddie tries to go after her but gets trapped and dies a rather confusing death. Enter Charlie, the token socially-inept new guy who OF COURSE is the only one who can see dead people, or at least just Eddie. Eddie immediately falls into the trolling asshole ghost role before dropping the "if you help me move on I'll stop bothering you", and the race is on. Then we get the token ghost's-ex-girlfriend-who-doesn't-like-Charlie-at-first, although it doesn't end like we think it will. The humor is silly, some parts are predictable but there are some unexpectedly fresh takes in the plot. If you're a ghost story fan or just like this particular genre, it's not a complete waste of time.
Honestly, this movie was okay, maybe a little less than average. The plot is tried-and-true, but it's not executed that well. Anthony Padilla and Ian Hecox, well known for their YouTube channel Smosh, do a fair job of keeping the watcher watching the movie because of their chemistry that is brought over from their web series, but even that becomes a little bit shaky.
Anthony plays Charlie, a socially inept cartoonist who is currently jobless, and Ian plays Ed, a recently perished young man who is forever doomed to stay "earthbound" (that's a reference to an awesome show that I will not mention directly) until he makes right with all the people that he left with on bad terms. I find the similarities between these two characters and the characters that both Anthony and Ian play on Smosh, as Ian plays the guy who tries to goad Anthony into doing something that Anthony doesn't want to do.
Ian's character Ed has some quirks that can be found funny to the right person. He uses the word penultimately incorrectly which actually ends up being a good thing for everyone in the end.
Overall, this film is one of those where you can take it or leave it. It doesn't bring anything special or new to film, but you can still enjoy it for what it is.
Anthony plays Charlie, a socially inept cartoonist who is currently jobless, and Ian plays Ed, a recently perished young man who is forever doomed to stay "earthbound" (that's a reference to an awesome show that I will not mention directly) until he makes right with all the people that he left with on bad terms. I find the similarities between these two characters and the characters that both Anthony and Ian play on Smosh, as Ian plays the guy who tries to goad Anthony into doing something that Anthony doesn't want to do.
Ian's character Ed has some quirks that can be found funny to the right person. He uses the word penultimately incorrectly which actually ends up being a good thing for everyone in the end.
Overall, this film is one of those where you can take it or leave it. It doesn't bring anything special or new to film, but you can still enjoy it for what it is.
Smosh's second feature film, "Ghostmates," is so unbelievably incompetent that I don't know where to begin.
It's a movie starring YouTube comedians Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla, known for their channel Smosh, as Eddie and Charlie. On the day he wants to ask his girlfriend Jessica (Francesca Galassi) to move in with him, he inadvertently chokes himself to death on his necktie when it gets caught in the door. But instead of going to heaven, Eddie is doomed to haunt the apartment until he can make things right on Earth and put himself at peace.
Enter Charlie, an unemployed cartoonist and electronics salesman who's been out of work for six months, yet somehow has money to shell out for a new home. He moves into the dead Eddie's suite, and Eddie twists his arm into helping him set things right so he can ascend to heaven. All of this is in spite of Eddie having the ability to interact with the world, like using a ketchup bottle to write on the wall or being able to enter people's bodies to possess them, and with a skill set like that, it's anyone's guess why Eddie needs Charlie to help him at all.
Even with a premise as worn and as overused as this one, the Smosh team still manages to make a mess of it. They don't add anything new, exciting, or surprising to a very predictable story, but that's not even the worst part of it. Even the easiest things they manage to muck up. There's no consistency for how Eddie the Ghost behaves, for example. He's able to walk through walls and inhabit people's bodies, but when his ex-girlfriend tries to touch his hand, hers doesn't phase through his. Eddie is also only able to lift up objects, it seems, when the plot demands it, because there are numerous circumstances when conflict could have been resolved if Eddie had just picked something up to prove he's actually a ghost.
On a technical level, the direction is lazy, the sound mix is abysmal, and the cinematography is that of a YouTube video with no effort being made to make it appear cinematic. Shadows on people's faces at nighttime? Really? For being produced by YouTube Red, this is a film that shows very little production value.
Its pacing is also abhorrent, and we don't even meet Padilla's character until we're almost at the 10-minute mark. Eddie doesn't even have a goal until 20 minutes into the movie. The middle is paced just fine, but there aren't any stakes for our awkward goofball leads, and the ending third is just speedy and weightless.
Yet the film's main folly is that its target audience is one that doesn't even know what the word "folly" means. Plot points are repeated over and over again, messages are hammered into the viewer like a brick to the face, and all of the comedy completely lacks both humor and subtlety. The "jokes" screenwriter Ryan Finnerty and stars Hecox and Padilla have devised for this film are uncannily bereft of any punchlines. And when there are comedic situations in the film, they exist only for a joke and not to serve the story. Why is T. Pain in this film? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why is there a conversation about corn dogs that goes on for a full minute and serves no purpose to the plot? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why does the story grind to a halt for an out-of-nowhere and probably offensive Bollywood spoof? Because someone thought it'd be funny.
That the film's jokes are aimed at such a young demographic that its audience wouldn't even care about the lack of punchlines would be forgivable if not for how seriously the film takes itself.
The things that people love about Smosh, based on their Food Fight videos alone, is their unabashed goofiness, their absurdist sense of humor, and their fast-paced, zany action. "Ghostmates" has none of this. It's taking two comedians known for their silliness and placing them in a grounded, dramatic piece that puts a dull story before the comedy, and I'm sure that's something that no one -- not even Smosh fans -- wants to see.
It's a movie starring YouTube comedians Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla, known for their channel Smosh, as Eddie and Charlie. On the day he wants to ask his girlfriend Jessica (Francesca Galassi) to move in with him, he inadvertently chokes himself to death on his necktie when it gets caught in the door. But instead of going to heaven, Eddie is doomed to haunt the apartment until he can make things right on Earth and put himself at peace.
Enter Charlie, an unemployed cartoonist and electronics salesman who's been out of work for six months, yet somehow has money to shell out for a new home. He moves into the dead Eddie's suite, and Eddie twists his arm into helping him set things right so he can ascend to heaven. All of this is in spite of Eddie having the ability to interact with the world, like using a ketchup bottle to write on the wall or being able to enter people's bodies to possess them, and with a skill set like that, it's anyone's guess why Eddie needs Charlie to help him at all.
Even with a premise as worn and as overused as this one, the Smosh team still manages to make a mess of it. They don't add anything new, exciting, or surprising to a very predictable story, but that's not even the worst part of it. Even the easiest things they manage to muck up. There's no consistency for how Eddie the Ghost behaves, for example. He's able to walk through walls and inhabit people's bodies, but when his ex-girlfriend tries to touch his hand, hers doesn't phase through his. Eddie is also only able to lift up objects, it seems, when the plot demands it, because there are numerous circumstances when conflict could have been resolved if Eddie had just picked something up to prove he's actually a ghost.
On a technical level, the direction is lazy, the sound mix is abysmal, and the cinematography is that of a YouTube video with no effort being made to make it appear cinematic. Shadows on people's faces at nighttime? Really? For being produced by YouTube Red, this is a film that shows very little production value.
Its pacing is also abhorrent, and we don't even meet Padilla's character until we're almost at the 10-minute mark. Eddie doesn't even have a goal until 20 minutes into the movie. The middle is paced just fine, but there aren't any stakes for our awkward goofball leads, and the ending third is just speedy and weightless.
Yet the film's main folly is that its target audience is one that doesn't even know what the word "folly" means. Plot points are repeated over and over again, messages are hammered into the viewer like a brick to the face, and all of the comedy completely lacks both humor and subtlety. The "jokes" screenwriter Ryan Finnerty and stars Hecox and Padilla have devised for this film are uncannily bereft of any punchlines. And when there are comedic situations in the film, they exist only for a joke and not to serve the story. Why is T. Pain in this film? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why is there a conversation about corn dogs that goes on for a full minute and serves no purpose to the plot? Because someone thought it'd be funny. Why does the story grind to a halt for an out-of-nowhere and probably offensive Bollywood spoof? Because someone thought it'd be funny.
That the film's jokes are aimed at such a young demographic that its audience wouldn't even care about the lack of punchlines would be forgivable if not for how seriously the film takes itself.
The things that people love about Smosh, based on their Food Fight videos alone, is their unabashed goofiness, their absurdist sense of humor, and their fast-paced, zany action. "Ghostmates" has none of this. It's taking two comedians known for their silliness and placing them in a grounded, dramatic piece that puts a dull story before the comedy, and I'm sure that's something that no one -- not even Smosh fans -- wants to see.
After the failure of Smosh: The Movie last year next year we got this movie starring Ian & Anthony noy playing as themselves but instead with fictional character names this time except that this movie manages to be way more inferior also in fact worse than the 'Smosh: The Movie' it actually had some unique ideas even if it didn't work with the comedy of it falls completely flat on its face this movie with title of 'Ghostmates' itself also as a comedy movie just feels soulless rather being funny It's really hard to write this review weather I would recommend this to a smosh fan or a regular average movie viewer without trying to sound harsh but their is nothing in this movie worth seeing I don't recommend anybody to anybody watching it.
Here's a thing when I first watched this movie I feel completely nothing, Cold, Empty, Soulless and not even laughing once in the entire movie after I got the end of the movie unlike with 'Smosh: The Movie' I try to pretend I liked it and it was good when I was a kid but in reality it was not a good movie, I'm not saying the movie has some bad acting it does have some decent acting from Ian & Anthony the main characters of the movie but I can't remember the names of fictional characters but most of the time the acting is amature from the cast of the movie not that I blame they had nothing to work with it beside that one credit their is nothing positive I could about this movie I could say it's a waste of time I rather watch 'Smosh: The Movie' or 'Fred: The Movie' I'm being completely honest to myself their is nothing redeeming about this movie when I comedy film fails at being funny or entertaining than it's not worth watching it
I know that making movies is hard but with this film's budget which I had no idea what the budget after lots of research for this movie but I can't find the actual budget so I'm just gonna guess it's around maybe 2 or 1 million dollars but they could of done something way more creative with it but I guess the director couldn't come up with any creative in his mind. So overall I do not recommend this movie to any one if you are getting in to it don't expect any redeeming qualities but I do warn you it's mostly boring, I'm giving this one 1 out of 10 on IMDb and on Letterboxd giving it a 0.5 out of 5 stars.
Here's a thing when I first watched this movie I feel completely nothing, Cold, Empty, Soulless and not even laughing once in the entire movie after I got the end of the movie unlike with 'Smosh: The Movie' I try to pretend I liked it and it was good when I was a kid but in reality it was not a good movie, I'm not saying the movie has some bad acting it does have some decent acting from Ian & Anthony the main characters of the movie but I can't remember the names of fictional characters but most of the time the acting is amature from the cast of the movie not that I blame they had nothing to work with it beside that one credit their is nothing positive I could about this movie I could say it's a waste of time I rather watch 'Smosh: The Movie' or 'Fred: The Movie' I'm being completely honest to myself their is nothing redeeming about this movie when I comedy film fails at being funny or entertaining than it's not worth watching it
I know that making movies is hard but with this film's budget which I had no idea what the budget after lots of research for this movie but I can't find the actual budget so I'm just gonna guess it's around maybe 2 or 1 million dollars but they could of done something way more creative with it but I guess the director couldn't come up with any creative in his mind. So overall I do not recommend this movie to any one if you are getting in to it don't expect any redeeming qualities but I do warn you it's mostly boring, I'm giving this one 1 out of 10 on IMDb and on Letterboxd giving it a 0.5 out of 5 stars.
I'll put this right out there, I'm no fan of SMOSH. I find their humor to be juvenile and very "youtube" oriented if such a concept exists. I get it that they're hip with the kids but that's probably only because they haven't built up much life experience yet and still think farts are funny. You know, they were funny when you were 7 and your humor hasn't evolved since then.
"Smosh: The Movie" was bad but I can still say that there was some effort put into it. I would assume it was their version of a 90 minute youtube video. But it's a masterpiece compared to this. This movie isn't just bad. It's lazy and if anything that's a lot worse than just being bad.
There's no effort put into this to craft a joke or make a good scene. It's just stuff happening for no reason. Some guy dies and starts acting like an asshole and trolling the only guy that can see him to force him to help the dead guy get to heaven. Yeah, nowhere in the history of cinema has that plot ever been used.
From what I've seen even diehard fans of Smosh hate this movie. And that's saying something.
This is by far one of the worst things I've ever seen and if this is what Youtube Red is all about then it's a failed experiment.
"Smosh: The Movie" was bad but I can still say that there was some effort put into it. I would assume it was their version of a 90 minute youtube video. But it's a masterpiece compared to this. This movie isn't just bad. It's lazy and if anything that's a lot worse than just being bad.
There's no effort put into this to craft a joke or make a good scene. It's just stuff happening for no reason. Some guy dies and starts acting like an asshole and trolling the only guy that can see him to force him to help the dead guy get to heaven. Yeah, nowhere in the history of cinema has that plot ever been used.
From what I've seen even diehard fans of Smosh hate this movie. And that's saying something.
This is by far one of the worst things I've ever seen and if this is what Youtube Red is all about then it's a failed experiment.
Did you know
- TriviaThe second Smosh feature film, the first one being Smosh: The Movie, but this is the first Smosh venture to the YouTube Red platform.
- GoofsIn the beginning, Ed's tie is gets stuck through the door, causing him to die. But on Jessica's side of the door, Ed's tie is unseeable, making Ed's cause of death impossible to happen.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Smosh's Try Not to Laugh: Try Not to Laugh Challenge #38 w/ Tom Lennon (2020)
- SoundtracksYou and I
Written and Produced by Peter de Leon "Peteywunder"
- How long is Ghostmates?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1 / (high definition)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content