In the year 1922, a rancher conspires to murder his wife for financial gain and convinces his teenage son to participate.In the year 1922, a rancher conspires to murder his wife for financial gain and convinces his teenage son to participate.In the year 1922, a rancher conspires to murder his wife for financial gain and convinces his teenage son to participate.
- Awards
- 1 win & 4 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I didn't know what to expect from this movie, and I hadn't even heard about it prior to finding it on Netflix. I decided to sit down and watch it solely because of the fact that it had Thomas Jane in the lead role.
The movie has a very nicely constructed storyline, especially since director Zak Hilditch was so adept at letting the story carry itself and build up momentum.
There was some really good acting from an equally nice cast. I will say that Thomas Jane was expertly cast for this role, and he really lived up to the role in every sense. He was very believable and pulled it off quite nicely.
The rats were a fantastic image of Wilfred's guilt gnawing at him and gradually breaking down his psyche. There was a very good atmosphere throughout the entire movie.
The great costumes and make-up also helped the movie along quite nicely.
If I have to put my finger on something here, then I would say that the storyline did suffer from being somewhat predictable though.
The movie has a very nicely constructed storyline, especially since director Zak Hilditch was so adept at letting the story carry itself and build up momentum.
There was some really good acting from an equally nice cast. I will say that Thomas Jane was expertly cast for this role, and he really lived up to the role in every sense. He was very believable and pulled it off quite nicely.
The rats were a fantastic image of Wilfred's guilt gnawing at him and gradually breaking down his psyche. There was a very good atmosphere throughout the entire movie.
The great costumes and make-up also helped the movie along quite nicely.
If I have to put my finger on something here, then I would say that the storyline did suffer from being somewhat predictable though.
Much like Stephen King's 1408 (a short story from his Everything's Eventual collection), 1922 is another short story that transfers well to the silver screen. 1922 is an American Gothic tale set at a family's comfortable farm in the mid-west. Hundreds of acres of pristine farmland, a thriving crop, a proud father, and blue skies as far as one can see. The husband has plenty to love about life here, except for his ill-contented wife. This idyllic scene becomes the backdrop of husbands conniving treachery, and a thematic string of mishaps and horrors which follow. The sweet life is not so sweet anymore. Thomas Jane churns out a strong and convincing performance not to be missed.
My thoughts:
1 - the movie was very similar to the novella which is a great thing.
2 - The actors portraying Wilf and Hank nailed the characters.
3 - No CGI that I could notice. The movie relied on subtlety and didn't try to explain everything detail.
4 - My wife enjoyed it, and she is a tough big to crack.
1 - the movie was very similar to the novella which is a great thing.
2 - The actors portraying Wilf and Hank nailed the characters.
3 - No CGI that I could notice. The movie relied on subtlety and didn't try to explain everything detail.
4 - My wife enjoyed it, and she is a tough big to crack.
I loved it from start to end. Thomas Jane gives another excellent performance!
The plot is thrilling and makes you want to keep watching even if it's a slow-paced film. It reminded me a lot of old school horror/suspense films from the 80's. The ones that didn't depend on jump-scares or stupid demonic creatures to make the whole movie.
Don't listen to those few people arguing the film was boring because it was slow. Maybe they're used to jump-scares and serial killers. This is a very simple but deep plot that is worth seeing.
The plot is thrilling and makes you want to keep watching even if it's a slow-paced film. It reminded me a lot of old school horror/suspense films from the 80's. The ones that didn't depend on jump-scares or stupid demonic creatures to make the whole movie.
Don't listen to those few people arguing the film was boring because it was slow. Maybe they're used to jump-scares and serial killers. This is a very simple but deep plot that is worth seeing.
Amazing performance by Thomas Jane and beautiful cinematography make this a perfect example of style over substance. The second half of the film lost a lot of its grip on me. The story is harrowing but feels underwhemling. Works better as a novella and perhaps should have been made into an 80 minute movie. Still worth a viewing.
Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating
Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating
See how IMDb users rank the feature films based on the work of Stephen King.
Did you know
- TriviaStephen King himself has expressed his satisfaction with the adaptation of "1922," stating that he was "delighted by the film." His endorsement further adds to the appeal of the movie for fans of his work.
- GoofsThe various currencies found around the house are small $20 Bills,they where only made after 1929. All the currency should have been large size notes (not in terms of denominations but physical size).
- Quotes
Wilfred James: I discovered something that night that most people never have to learn. Murder is sin. Murder is damnation. But murder is also work.
- Crazy creditsVintage end credits.
- How long is 1922?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 42 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content