[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
Nia Long and Idina Menzel in Une promesse au nom de notre amitié (2017)

User reviews

Une promesse au nom de notre amitié

33 reviews
5/10

SORRY, BEACHES 1988 IT WASN'T

  • plutus1947
  • Apr 19, 2019
  • Permalink
4/10

Way too over paced

When a movie is remade, you have to expect everyone to make a comparison. In that regard, this new version is just flat. It doesn't allow the viewer the chance to gain any depth or get drawn into the movie. You can just feel the rush of this movie trying to cram it all in to fit the allotted commercial insertions. Such a shame. The opening scenes with the two young girls are poorly acted. I almost stopped watching, but the adults pulled it off. Nia Long gives an exceptional performance. But again, this entire movie is so rushed, the great performance is overshadowed by the hasty flow. The singing by Menzel is actually good, which is another positive. But overall, the original is a major standout compared to this. TV movie remake failed in this case, unfortunately. You can't tell this incredible story in less than 90 minutes. And trying to do so is why it fell way short.
  • pocodfe
  • Mar 23, 2017
  • Permalink
5/10

Some movies should not be remade

Bette Midler is a tough act to follow. One must almost go for a completely different interpretation. That wasn't done here. Idina Menzel has the chops as a singer, of course, but beyond that she's no Bette Midler. If she was trying for a different interpretation, it didn't work. In fact, it couldn't have worked. Over 30 minutes were chopped out of the running time as compared to the original. It is extra time that was desperately needed. The character development, the intricacies of the interactions, many of the nuances, all suffered just to get plot points in and leave room for commercials. Nia Long has turned in some brilliant portrayals in other projects. Here, she was mostly underused. Hillary has the more subtle character; it has to be played to CC without being secondary. Nia wasn't given enough screen time to do this. Updating the story didn't help either. There was a unique cachet about pre-gambling Atlantic City in its heyday, along with Broadway in its prime. The present day setting for this version was too bland. (Nuns in sitcoms just don't cut it. Respectable female New York lawyers are old school. The boardwalk in AC has very little charm any more.) There really wasn't any useful reason to update the story anyway, other than to point up that Beaches 2017 isn't Beaches 1988. It certainly isn't.
  • mharah
  • Jul 14, 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

Painful

  • jaiami-10-791064
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • Permalink
2/10

If there was ever a reason not to redo something, this is it.

I've seen quite a few remakes over the years but nothing like this. It takes a film that could reduce Starlin to tears and turns it into a tacky and badly cast pile of not worthy of bearing it's name.

I'ts terrible and makes you wonder why the people responsible for the original film would allow this, think cheap American daytime soap and you pretty much get how this was remade.

It is awful.
  • brummylee
  • Feb 14, 2017
  • Permalink
6/10

Not Bad For A Remake Of A Classic Film

First time I saw Beaches was during the premiere on Lifetime in January 2017 , one of the reasons why remakes are made is to introduce a new generation to a popular film with a new spin on it.

Idina Menzel's rendition of Bette Midler's Wind Beneath My Wings was amazing and sung so beautifully, the film retells the story of a friendship between two women from different backgrounds that spans from childhood to adulthood.

Nia Long's portrayal of Hillary Whitney was good, like Barbra Hershey in the original film her character goes through many changes beginning with befriending CC Bloom who wants to be a star to becoming a lawyer, wife and then eventually a single mother is handled well.

Fellow cast members Gabriella Pizzolo, Grace Capeless, Antonio Cupo, Colin Lawrence, Sanai Victoria , Jodi Capeless and Donny Lucas rounded out the cast perfectly.

I give this film a 6.3/ 10
  • gnowaczek
  • Mar 7, 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

Couldn't Make It To The End

  • jlh-30025
  • Aug 29, 2017
  • Permalink
9/10

Beaches Redux...My Take 💙

I actually enjoyed this movie...Never saw the first one so maybe I just don't have anything to compare it to...however, "Wind Beneath My Wings" has always been a favorite so hearing it in this remake still was able to bring me to tears 😢
  • cheryl329
  • Mar 21, 2021
  • Permalink
6/10

The Bette Midler version is better then the remake!

The remake is ok but I think the bette midler version is a lot better then the remake.

I remember the actress who played cc bloom in this remake she played in the Disney movie of enchanted.
  • IMKidHunni
  • May 21, 2022
  • Permalink
3/10

Idina Menzel terrible acting

I have seen the movie in the past and loved it. Loved how the writers made the movie to where it is not exactly the same as the old one. Idina Menzel was absolutely terrible at acting. The Singing was good. Acting was not natural for her. Nia Long was great as her character.
  • buttercup_ts
  • Apr 20, 2020
  • Permalink
6/10

A bit confused but has potential

Time moves forward & to have this story about a white woman & black woman was a nice thing to see. But within that lay some confusion. I know some African Americans are wealthy & can be elitist, but generally are not. That's history! So to typecast this character in this role just seemed weird. The original film had working class noo yorker vs preppy wasp woman who came from a family of new england privilege, That was true & authentic. Rather than stick to the original Beaches story, a better take would have been to contrast a white woman vs black. there could be wealth difference but cultural difference could be enough. A good start though... As regards a lot of other references, they seemed a bit fake as 2017 is a very different world to when the first Beaches appeared. Back then flights were expensive & communication could lapse. But these days we are all a tap away from communication, so the lapses on that did not stack up as making sense. And the idea to know you are dying & not talk with your daughter about plans may have been the world of yesteryear but not today!
  • graham-harvey
  • Jan 5, 2021
  • Permalink
1/10

Another remake fail

I heard somewhere that this was being remade, and I heard Idina would be in a starring role, so I thought, hmm OK, she can sort of act, and she can certainly sing.... she's no Bette Midler obviously but perhaps it might be better than the Ghostbusters disaster....

So some weeks later I find this online, and think ah OK, lets see how this worked out.

I firstly noticed it appeared to be about half an hour less than the original - kind of strange.

What it appears happened is that all the talent, skill and entertainment were taken out, who knew you could measure these things in time.

From the outset it's just bad, the opening cliché scene, with the same dialogue but delivered with all the care of an out of control rally driver, well it just made me cringe.

And from there is appears to be going downhill rapidly, I'm about 20 mins in now, and I can safely say other than Idina singing, this BAD REMAKE has no redeeming qualities at all.

I would say this is another example of an attempt to 'bring it to a new audience' when the original if it got a 20th or 30th anniversary release update thing would have been far more successful, and far better than this complete load of nonsense.

I can find no redemption in this film other than Idina singing, and I literally mean the singing, her acting is just as bad as it was in Glee *sigh*

I don't imagine it is likely I will see this through to the end without being compelled to scratch my eyes out and ram cotton buds in my ears......

Please Hollywodd, stop raping the classics for the sake of a quick bit of gratification - this is about as successful as premature ejaculation.
  • michaelrthomson
  • May 9, 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

Paaaaiiiiinful

9/10 times, remakes of iconic, heart-warming masterpieces should never be made - let alone attempted. This movie is no exemption to that.

Aside from the boring, sleep-inducing acting and lack of narrative, this "remake" fails to capture the very essence that was Beaches. Without Bette Midler and Barbara Hershey dominating the screen with their chemistry that can be felt in even the youngest of hearts who weren't even alive in the 80s, this failed attempt to rekindle a classic should be a hard pass for anyone with any ounce of respect for the original.

Please stop trying to recapture the classics. It never works.
  • SawyerSaiyan
  • Aug 11, 2023
  • Permalink
1/10

Horrible remake

This should never have been remade! IdIna can sing but she can't act, unless it's Disney. Perhaps trying to remake Bette Midler movies is not a good idea.
  • jennysnovak
  • May 30, 2020
  • Permalink
1/10

Absolutely pitiful

Each and everyone one of the people in this remake should hang their heads in shame what an absolute horrendous remark of a beautiful story/movie. Both main actresses performances were pitiful it was as if they had the script in their hands and they were reading off it. Absolutely no personality and no emotion at all it was embarrassing to watch them try to act. Horrendous
  • kerry_kirby09
  • Jan 5, 2021
  • Permalink
10/10

Life long friendship

  • hsmith-84652
  • May 28, 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

Lead actors were reversed

As another reviewer indicated, it appears that the lead actors were reversed. In the beginning, you see Nia Long with the big sunglasses and the gorgeous styled hair which I was sure was CC, and Idina Menzel resembling Barbara Hershey in the original as Hillary. Turned out to be the opposite which got more confusing seeing Nia Long portray the more demure Hillary. She would have been better cast as the brassy CC, and Idina Menzel as Hillary.
  • moviewatcher2010
  • Feb 2, 2021
  • Permalink
9/10

Nice family friendly movie

I enjoyed this, I saw the original one a long time ago. Great acting. Overall a good story, teaches valuable life lessons. I cried at the end, even though I knew what was coming. One of those movies that helps you to remember that life is short, and love is important.
  • vgarris-13875
  • Dec 26, 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

Not a patch on the original!

Wow! So first of all no one in this movie can actually act, so that's a problem. Second of all, the actress who plays CC when she sings sounds like she's just inhaled helium. Ugh! If I hadn't of watched the original 50 times I might have thought this was an ok movie, but nah it's pretty terrible. Don't waste your time!
  • ljsheppard
  • Jan 5, 2021
  • Permalink
1/10

Absolutely disappointed.

  • donnydeutsch-83342
  • Oct 17, 2022
  • Permalink
1/10

Wow... this was horrible.

I will never understand why people want to remake classic movies and then just ruin them. It was bad enough that the two main actresses in the movie could not act, but the bad acting ruined any possibility of a good story. Do not recommend. The original movie back in the 1980's was so good and holds so much nostalgia. The young girls were such amazing young actresses and brought so much life to the film. When this movie started The acting was so bad that it was painful, bit I kept trying to give it another chance. I was hoping the movie would redeem itself, but it just got worse as time went on. Please stop trying to remake classics. It doesnt work.
  • myfaithlasts
  • Oct 6, 2022
  • Permalink
1/10

Adele Gazeem

Wow, I caught about 10 minutes of it, and it was painful. The only positive I can say is, Idina is a very good singer.
  • edblackham
  • Jun 6, 2020
  • Permalink
9/10

PERSPECTIVE IS KEY

I am one of the smaller percentage of people who views things as though the glass is half full. Being a fan of many remakes, but more so being a fan of Idina Menzel could make this review somewhat bias. However, I will review this movie remake as though my love for Idina Menzel wasn't reason enough to love it.

I love several of Bette Midler's movies. My favorite is "For The Boys" costarring James Caan. Bette has an interesting way of singing that comes off as though she developed the ability to sing through training alone. Sometimes Bette's singing bothers me. Loving her remake of Gypsy but not truly feeling the classical atmosphere as the original could easily make the average critic not enjoy it.

But we are here to review her movie remake "Beaches" with Idina Menzel and Nia Long. The following are the reasons why I love this remake.

1) New music. You have to be able to stomach Idina Menzel's voice to love the music in this movie. Wicked the musical and both Frozen movies are only 2 places you will hear her amazing unique way of delivering a song.

2) Diversity, I love how her best friend in this movie was a different color than in the original, Being a white male who has connected and related to mostly African american women gives me a personal connection to the changes in this remake.

3) A shorter movie. Sometimes I think people make movies way too long, and sometimes not long enough. The original movie was way too long, often taking extended moments of nothing important going on making my attention span shorter than usual. I felt like the pace in this version was way better.

I am not going to talk about what I didn't like about it because, again I am looking at the glass as half full. Lower budget, smaller names, being a lifetime movie is what hurt the execution and costuming, set, etc that made this movie look less than the original. Plus there isn't much of a backing score when CiCi is not singing. Anyway, I loved it, and will always love it because I am the one who generally loves the remakes everyone else hates - I love Idina Menzel, love Nia Long (Single Mom's Club) - and I find Idina Menzel to have far greater talent in singing than Bette Midler - Love the original - but love this one more
  • QueerVamp20
  • Jan 11, 2020
  • Permalink
1/10

Total Garbage

If this one doesn't make you puke, nothing will. There's not a grain of talent in the entire cast.
  • waldoborolibby
  • Jun 21, 2020
  • Permalink
8/10

Loved the Original storyline but love love the remake.

By the end just like the original one I was 😭 crying my eyeballs out! Over all I enjoyed it at 46 just as I did at 15.

I'm not a movie nit picker if it can hold my attention. There were rushed areas but overall Nia did a heart touching great job. I personally think it got better and better the longer you watch!

I'd watch it again for sure multiple times!

OBX 1986 Becky I will always think of you as my CC!
  • JLaurinA
  • Jun 25, 2020
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.