IMDb RATING
5.0/10
3.9K
YOUR RATING
A story set in Indochina in 1959, a land beyond rule and a time without mercy and the birth of a legend.A story set in Indochina in 1959, a land beyond rule and a time without mercy and the birth of a legend.A story set in Indochina in 1959, a land beyond rule and a time without mercy and the birth of a legend.
JuJu Chan Szeto
- Isabelle
- (as JuJu Chan)
Jawed Berni
- French Legionnaire
- (as Jawed El Berni)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Very basic storyline, effects low budget. HOWEVER there are some good fight scenes (as you could expect with Scott Adkins)
Martial arts actor Scott Adkins usually has a good sense of what film projects to pick, so when I found this particular film of his on Netflix, I took the opportunity to see it. It's not one of his very best movies, but overall it does have enough good things to warrant it a recommendation. Yes, it could have been a lot better than it ultimately is. The script is for the most part a collection of plot turns and occurrences that you will have seen many times before. The characters are also not that new as well. There are also some slow patches that will on occasion have the viewer telling the movie to simply get on with it. Also, there is a weird narration device throughout that doesn't really add anything, instead coming across as a possible post-production patch-up job.
But most people don't watch movies like this for their writing. Instead, they watch them for plentiful (and well done) action sequences. And when it comes to this part of the movie, things are pretty well done. The action (a mix of gunplay and martial arts) is very well crafted. In fact, it's pretty brutal, exciting, and bloody at times; whoever provided the fake blood for this movie probably comfortably retired when filming was completed.
As I indicated earlier, this is far from a perfect movie. It certainly isn't for everybody at any time. I would say that if you are in the mood for some brutal and well crafted action, and don't mind sitting through an awkward and very familiar story, the movie will grab your attention for 95 minutes.
But most people don't watch movies like this for their writing. Instead, they watch them for plentiful (and well done) action sequences. And when it comes to this part of the movie, things are pretty well done. The action (a mix of gunplay and martial arts) is very well crafted. In fact, it's pretty brutal, exciting, and bloody at times; whoever provided the fake blood for this movie probably comfortably retired when filming was completed.
As I indicated earlier, this is far from a perfect movie. It certainly isn't for everybody at any time. I would say that if you are in the mood for some brutal and well crafted action, and don't mind sitting through an awkward and very familiar story, the movie will grab your attention for 95 minutes.
I reckon if Scott Adkins was around in the 80s he'd be a very big star. As it is, he even struggles having a fan base in his "home" in the UK. But that doesn't stop him having decent success in quite a few movies in recent years. Also while I'm not sure if he's big in Japan (tonight), I do know he's big in Germany.
But even over here this particular movie will have some issues. Or rather limited success to be more specific. While the movie does try to give the whole thing a slightly different taste with its story it doesn't work that well overall. Also the action scenes are not the best he's done, stunt wise that is. If you're a fan of his work, this may be worth a look, but everyone else should probably spend their time otherwise
But even over here this particular movie will have some issues. Or rather limited success to be more specific. While the movie does try to give the whole thing a slightly different taste with its story it doesn't work that well overall. Also the action scenes are not the best he's done, stunt wise that is. If you're a fan of his work, this may be worth a look, but everyone else should probably spend their time otherwise
Lets get the obvious out of the way, is it something that will keep you on the edge of the seat? No. The story was quite OK. The script was barely good. The acting was just decent however as usual when the action and choreography is concerned with Scott Adkins, he is great. This movie is no where close to The Ninja series or the Undisputed Series however if you are Adkins fan , I would suggest you see it. It starts off slow but the action sequences at the end becomes really nice and has couple of strange twists as well which keep your head scratching. All in all good action movie but that's about it.
I went into this as a random pick and mix film, they tend to be horrors.....this wasn't.
Savage Dog is an old school action flick starring Scott Adkins and the excellent veteran of the industry Keith David.
It tells the story of a disgraced former boxer in 1959 who finds himself at the mercy of a local baron who wants him to fight for money. It's full of your usual mindless action tropes and though the action certainly looks good it doesn't make it any different than 10k comparable titles.
The narration/performance by David is solid as usual, as for Adkins I don't see the appeal. The man is dull and lifeless much like Van Damme and Lungren were when they first started out in the industry.
Every square inch of this film has been done before and better. I may not be the demographic, I may generally not like action films and therefore am hard to please but this is so generic it hurts.
The Good:
Action looks great
Keith David
The Bad:
As shallow and mindless as they come
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Action movie actors start terrible and get marginally better over the years
Savage Dog is an old school action flick starring Scott Adkins and the excellent veteran of the industry Keith David.
It tells the story of a disgraced former boxer in 1959 who finds himself at the mercy of a local baron who wants him to fight for money. It's full of your usual mindless action tropes and though the action certainly looks good it doesn't make it any different than 10k comparable titles.
The narration/performance by David is solid as usual, as for Adkins I don't see the appeal. The man is dull and lifeless much like Van Damme and Lungren were when they first started out in the industry.
Every square inch of this film has been done before and better. I may not be the demographic, I may generally not like action films and therefore am hard to please but this is so generic it hurts.
The Good:
Action looks great
Keith David
The Bad:
As shallow and mindless as they come
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Action movie actors start terrible and get marginally better over the years
Did you know
- TriviaScott Adkins and Marko Zaror previously appreared together in Undisputed III: Redemption
- GoofsWhile fighting a large German with a tattoo on his chest, Martin kicks the German in the chest and a part of the tattoo goes missing. Next cut it's there again.
- How long is Savage Dog?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $4,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 34 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.20 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content