Across walls, fences, and alleys, rats not only expose our boundaries of separation but make homes in them. This documentary uses the rat to explore the history of Baltimore.Across walls, fences, and alleys, rats not only expose our boundaries of separation but make homes in them. This documentary uses the rat to explore the history of Baltimore.Across walls, fences, and alleys, rats not only expose our boundaries of separation but make homes in them. This documentary uses the rat to explore the history of Baltimore.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 14 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Intriguing and uncomfortable questions are raised by Theo Anthony's film, which gives itself permission to meander between straight-forward aspects of pest control, and the larger innuendo surrounding the control of human society.
Yes, big cities like Baltimore have endemic problems. The rats are a ripe visual reminder in its gritty streets.
But what Theo Anthony really captures is that this same notorious mammal that is so often used in experimentation and treated as a close-equivalent for what to expect in humans via testing, is in fact a marker for what humans should expect in the society that is altering quickly around them.
The Rockefeller Foundation and other arms of scientific research have indeed tested on rats, and aimed to eugenically target certain human populations as well. There is much, much more to be found in personal research. A huge area, a blight on the part of society's self-appointed shepherds.
An unsettling visual metaphor emerges from the flow of the film -- the relationship between populations and their food supply; the relationship between the environment, and its ability to change its inhabitants; and at the same time, the perpetuation of conditions, the ghettos of Baltimore, namely, through policies, zoning, labeling and lending/lack of lending and investment.
What and who is marked as a pest, tends to remain a pest. Maybe it is a problem of what the looker has decided to see?
Yes, big cities like Baltimore have endemic problems. The rats are a ripe visual reminder in its gritty streets.
But what Theo Anthony really captures is that this same notorious mammal that is so often used in experimentation and treated as a close-equivalent for what to expect in humans via testing, is in fact a marker for what humans should expect in the society that is altering quickly around them.
The Rockefeller Foundation and other arms of scientific research have indeed tested on rats, and aimed to eugenically target certain human populations as well. There is much, much more to be found in personal research. A huge area, a blight on the part of society's self-appointed shepherds.
An unsettling visual metaphor emerges from the flow of the film -- the relationship between populations and their food supply; the relationship between the environment, and its ability to change its inhabitants; and at the same time, the perpetuation of conditions, the ghettos of Baltimore, namely, through policies, zoning, labeling and lending/lack of lending and investment.
What and who is marked as a pest, tends to remain a pest. Maybe it is a problem of what the looker has decided to see?
This was one of the worst films a SXSW Film Festival. The audience found it confusing and almost incoherent. The experimental attempt kept jumping around from rats to video games to the sociology of race in Baltimore to some sort of attempt to recreate crime scenes. None of these parts seemed to be connect to the other parts. It just jumped from one part to another without any real transition or clear narrative. The narration was also done in this strange voice that sounded almost like a computerized voice. There were individual scenes and characters that seemed somewhat intriguing particularly as they related to the human relations with rats. Some people wanted to exterminate them while others treated them as pets. But none of it connected in this poorly edited mess of a movie. This was film is sadly a failed experiment.
I have no idea what this film was supposed to be about. Some rats are present, both the wild and the lab kind, and Baltimore gets mentioned a lot, but you don't learn anything interesting about rats, Baltimore, or rats in Baltimore. Some lunatics hunt rats with blowpipe and fish them from alleys using bait and tackle (that image is where the film earns a second star from me). Contents also include: superficial musings on segregation; some stuff about forensics training that appears to have been recovered from another project and tacked on to this one to fill out the time; slow-mo shots of fireworks; and lots and lots of rendered footage purportedly from a video game but looking to all the world like Google Earth with 3D switched on running on a low-spec laptop. Baffling.
I was skipping forward a lot as many of the scenes are lingering for much much longer than they're worth. And I'm not one of the commenters here who were disappointed that this film is not really about rats. It has an important topic of history of segregation, systemic racism of urban planners and then private sector and how it didn't disappear today. I can see attempts to stimulate thinking about different scales switching from the rat scale: first rat houses, limiting their freedom of movements in the living room with reinforced plastic walls, then talk about redlining in Baltimore, preventing development of the poorest neighborhood, reinforced borders - red areas stayed red. Miniatures of death scenes, then human size forensics training rooms. I can see the potential. But the important informations/feelings this document has given me could be easily edited down to 15 minutes that would have more intense impact on me, this felt like listening to someone talking with half a minute pauses after each word.
Only about half of this film was about rats. Other parts were just rambling with long stretches using Google street views and aerial views of Baltimore. It was like it wanted to transport the viewer into some kind of video arcade or game. Statistics were cited over and over that had little correlation with rats. There was little in the way of relating these stats to rats.
This film was so annoying because it would have some segments on rats - and then veer completely off topic. It even showed what looked to be NASCAR racing!!
Even though this was hardly over an hour it just dragged on. Not very illuminating.
This film was so annoying because it would have some segments on rats - and then veer completely off topic. It even showed what looked to be NASCAR racing!!
Even though this was hardly over an hour it just dragged on. Not very illuminating.
Did you know
- TriviaThe blipping sound heard throughout the film is the sound of a rat's brainwaves.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Starfilm (2017)
- How long is Rat Film?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Крысы
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $35,195
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $7,793
- Sep 17, 2017
- Gross worldwide
- $35,195
- Runtime1 hour 22 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content