Le prix de l'infidelité

Although I have to admit, I don't even remember where he was staying at. And this is a TV movie, believe there is nothing that will surprise you. Well unless you include certain acting choices I guess. Since this was made for TV there is also no racy stuff never mind anything explicit like nudity. Just pointing this out, in case anyone thought otherwise.

This should not play a role in how much you enjoy this or rather in this case do not enjoy watching it. Some odd editing choices make certain scenes and the acting seem more wooden than it probably is (no pun intended). Ms. Butler is pretty and the infidelity predator is too. So while it lacks other qualities, maybe you like looking at good looking people

I agree with mgconlan-1. I would only watch this movie because handsome Canadian actor Marcus Rosner is in it. If Marcus Rosner did not appear in this film, I would NOT bother watching it at all. His body looks very good shirtless. He is the only guy that would interest me in that film. I would want him for a husband instead of Greg (Laura's spouse). Greg is not really my type for a husband. He was kind of boring! The stupidest part of the movie was when the internet café owner gives Laura the information of where his customer (Winnie) lives. If I were the guy's internet café customer, I would be furious. Also, I would not want Laura to know where I live!

Our world seems to thrive on making stupid movies with even stupider lead women. Walk away, walk away!

Having watched the entire film to see how it ends I can only say the film started off lousy and only progressed downward from an already lousy beginning. I don't care if the actors/actresses agreed to work for free, and the director picked up this script from the "Buy 1 and get 3 scripts free" bin this is just so boring that I cannot pick out even one scene where the dialogue was worthy to be edited in.

Who would even accept responsibility for putting their career ending name to this piece of junk? The film genre is listed as a Thriller much like the (1987) Fatal Attraction was which includes a love triangle that goes terribly wrong where the innocent and unsuspecting spouse is threatened by the unscrupulous scorned third party lover. Sound familiar? Well "Infidelity In Suburbia" is the end result of one person watching the original (1987) Fatal Attraction, and passing the film content by word of mouth from a first person 1 through person 1,000 and what you have left of a half decent film is this diluted piece of junk.

The ending if I told you what happened, would not be considered a spoiler, because the entire film is spoiled from beginning to end. After investing 90 minutes just to watch a terrible ending that I would rather have washed the dinner dishes and thrown out the garbage instead of wasting my time watching this garbage.

I give it two thumbs down because I only have two thumbs.

First time I saw this LMN movie and it proved to be the standard fare - frustrated wife and mother ignored by husband, cute kid, and good looking love/lust interest.

However, I found the following items rather unique:

1. The graphic depiction of sex (for LMN) - usually it is implied, or if shown, the man and woman are clothed. The sex scenes here were the opposite (although there was no censorable nudity).

2. A reason was given for the psycho's behavior, unpleasant as it was.

3. The relationship between the husband and wife.

Recommend to watch at least once, but don't expect a Hollywood Blockbuster.