Afterlife!

It's horrifying -- and not in the way you were hoping for. Most prominent are the terrible production values coupled with a goofy narrator who has sadly mistaken the serious -- and, poignant -- topic as an audition for Maybelline mascara.

It's devoid of anything that vaguely resembles scientific research and looks more like an episode of Clutch Cargo. What a waste of time.

As another reviewer pointed out, this travesty sets the topic back decades. Even the few snippets of halfway interesting footage can't redeem Ghosts and the Afterlife. There's not enough lipstick in the world to pretty up this pig.

I really liked this movie, but a few of the scenes really scared me. Maybe I'm too sensitive. Whatever, I liked it. A lot of interesting stuff and a lot of new things I never thought or heard of. I hope there is some kind of sequel.

Everything I saw looked realy interesting from the beginning to the end of the movie. I liked the little girl narrating it too. The WW2 soldier was really good as well. All in all, I think this is a very good movie, so I gave it a 9. The part on invisibility, the NASA stuff, the secret experiments done by the government, the after-death experiences, were all really interesting. I don't know what else to say.

Thanks for reading this.

How was this documentary made in 2022?? The graphics is straight out of the early 2000s. The soundtrack sounds like it belongs in a 1990s elevator (lift). Add that with some of the latest most advanced scientific information and you have yourself "Ghosts and the Afterlife".

After watching this documentary I am eagerly waiting for AI to take over this industry cause goodness gracious me, humans failed this one...

ADDITIONAL NON-SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: They mention all of the MDs and PHD that will feature in the documentary but in the end their input was minimal with most of the focus on Hollywood.

Really liked it. A lot of good information. I didn't like the girl's dress speaking as a fashion designer, I think it could have been a bit longer and a different color. Also, she changed her clothes so often, it made my head spin. And, maybe, it would have been a good idea to have a man narrate the film to give it more authority. Just saying that's my opinion. Of course, there was a large number of male contributors in the expert category. Also, in some scenes she wasn't even wearing shoes, which i guess is OK. Bottom line, i really liked the movie, so in the long run, I wold recommend it with 8 stars.

-Mike.

...this movie seems to have plenty, but I couldn't make it more than 20 minutes. Tried to tolerate the host, the bad audio, and even worse editing choices but it never got better. The host's wide eyed facial expressions and overly enthusiastic tone of voice come off kind of cartoonish creating a strange feeling of dissonance between her and the topics being discussed. Sound effects and background music frequently over power the volume of the people recounting their stories. The editing choices and quality are just... bad. It's poorly made which is a shame because the idea is there, it's just hard to watch. With how all over the place it is - makes me wonder if the intention was to hold the attention of a younger audience?