Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town
- 2017
- 1h 26m
IMDb RATING
5.6/10
2.2K
YOUR RATING
A woman at rock bottom must find her way across Los Angeles in order to crash her ex-boyfriend's engagement party.A woman at rock bottom must find her way across Los Angeles in order to crash her ex-boyfriend's engagement party.A woman at rock bottom must find her way across Los Angeles in order to crash her ex-boyfriend's engagement party.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 3 nominations total
LaKeith Stanfield
- George
- (as Keith Stanfield)
Robyn S. Clark
- Jogger
- (as Robyn Clark)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Izzy has to get across town to tell her ex boyfriend something. And she makes an epic journey. The most engaging scene is the one when Virginia challenges Izzy to tell something to Virginia's husband. It's a pity that this subplot isn't followed up or expanded. Izzy's journey is certainly eventful, and makes an interesting watch.
It was always a strong 8 really, at least, but the end, as others have noted, is really weak, and actually, as others have not, so is the arty, dream-sequence opening, which nearly made me switch off.
I'm very glad I stuck with it because ultimately what stuck with me were the good parts, so good they might be 9s or even 10s. And they define the whole, a frantic, hilarious odyssey through a city, in the small but honourable tradition of Ulysses, After Hours, Slacker and The Swimme, full of brilliant little vignettes and characters, sly twists and ironies, and a carefully paid out understanding of the life we're looking at. For the first half or so especially, those vignettes are something remarkable, each one almost a little movie in itself. It's simply superb writing, perfectly executed by all concerned.
MILD SPOILERS:
The third act, as others have noted, is a major bummer of a misfire, but things weaken even before that. For me, it started losing momentum at the sister's house, with the singing, which, in my view, should have been a bit of raucous, haywire acoustic punk that left everyone speechless.
And then, just finding out who the ex is, about whom all this mad dash has been about, is a huge letdown because he seems such a dullard, but also there's a terrible lack of clarity that is near the line demarcating interesting ambiguity, but neither on nor over it in my view.
The, I think, intended reading - Izzy breaks up her ex's engagement and then dumps him as revenge - doesn't seem to fit anything about her character. Much more interesting would have been if she'd been entirely sincere about wanting him back, then just helplessly shut down and ran out on it, like the true avoidant personality she probably is, putting the cap on her trail of destruction. Either way, a little rewriting and probably some recasting - of the boyfriend - would have been required.
It's really too bad it didn't quite get there. But I'm still going to watch it again for the good bits because I love them.
I'm very glad I stuck with it because ultimately what stuck with me were the good parts, so good they might be 9s or even 10s. And they define the whole, a frantic, hilarious odyssey through a city, in the small but honourable tradition of Ulysses, After Hours, Slacker and The Swimme, full of brilliant little vignettes and characters, sly twists and ironies, and a carefully paid out understanding of the life we're looking at. For the first half or so especially, those vignettes are something remarkable, each one almost a little movie in itself. It's simply superb writing, perfectly executed by all concerned.
MILD SPOILERS:
The third act, as others have noted, is a major bummer of a misfire, but things weaken even before that. For me, it started losing momentum at the sister's house, with the singing, which, in my view, should have been a bit of raucous, haywire acoustic punk that left everyone speechless.
And then, just finding out who the ex is, about whom all this mad dash has been about, is a huge letdown because he seems such a dullard, but also there's a terrible lack of clarity that is near the line demarcating interesting ambiguity, but neither on nor over it in my view.
The, I think, intended reading - Izzy breaks up her ex's engagement and then dumps him as revenge - doesn't seem to fit anything about her character. Much more interesting would have been if she'd been entirely sincere about wanting him back, then just helplessly shut down and ran out on it, like the true avoidant personality she probably is, putting the cap on her trail of destruction. Either way, a little rewriting and probably some recasting - of the boyfriend - would have been required.
It's really too bad it didn't quite get there. But I'm still going to watch it again for the good bits because I love them.
I really wanted to like this film, despite the mixed reviews. I enjoy a lot of the cast and was especially psyched to see the talented Mackenzie Davis given a project to carry. And for the first hour or so, I wasn't disappointed. But the last act (pretty much everything after the point where she confronts her former friend and leaves the party) is downright terrible. Neither what happens to her the next morning nor the very last scene makes any sense considering what comes before. It seems tacked on, like there was an original ending that didn't play well with preview audiences. This could have been so much better.
Thats essentially what this is. I say this. not to call the movie derivative, but to warn you that you should watch this with that expectation. I enjoyed it, because I liked clerks and thats the kind of film this ended up being. You follow izzy along with a cast of amusing but aimless trashy LA millennials on her journey to ruin a wedding. Its even told with a indie punk OST and in 10 or so chapters with breaks just like clerks. Nothing happens the way its supposed to as this is not a julia roberts movie and it just kind of ends. I liked Mackenzie Davis quite a bit. She played the part of a more realistic mess of a pixie dreamgirl well. I was charmed and disgusted, as you should be. The reason I give it something more like a 7 as apposed to a 10 because I feel like the scenes where izzy is having emotional introspective moments she did not emote well in so you're sort of left scrounging to figure out what shes supposed to be feeling and its awkward. That and I agree with others that the ending doesn't fit the film stylistically. The outcome is fine, but the way they get there doesn't fit with the dirty punk visuals and sound to the rest of the movie. That said I'd happily go watch MD in whatever she does next and I'll be open minded towards the writer/directors next project.
A meandering pointless "love" story? I dont know. Maybe. Maybe Im just old and cynical but this felt like a 16 year olds attempts at depth. It started off interesting but just devolved into bleh and then meandered into a horrible mess.
Mackenzie Davis carries it but even then its nihilistic.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is the first movie that Carrie Coon and Annie Potts star in together. The second one will be Ghostbuster, Afterlife.
- GoofsIn Izzy's bedroom toward the end of the film, the clock's time doesn't move and stays the exact same time for an entire scene.
- How long is Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Izzy Gets the F Across Town
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $20,208
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $10,559
- Jun 24, 2018
- Gross worldwide
- $20,208
- Runtime1 hour 26 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town (2017) officially released in India in English?
Answer