[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Mark Hamill and Tom Cullen in Knightfall (2017)

User reviews

Knightfall

374 reviews
7/10

Factually inaccurate but entertaining

Group of knights templar get involved in the schemes and politics of the French court, while also on the hunt for the holy grail. Kind of a mix between arthurian legend and the 3 musketeers, nothing particularly original so far, I've seen up to ep 8 season 1, but it's been entertaining and I will keep on watching, however for a show made by the history channel I wish the makers put much more effort in to make it historically accurate, as its portrayal is very factually inaccurate.
  • iainyg
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • Permalink
8/10

Very Interesting.

The show begun very poorly. If I remember right the first 2-3 episodes were hard to watch. Poor performances by all the actors and it seemed as a very low budget production. But since that the show has made an huge leap forward and it is Safe to say that in second season now it is one of my favorite shows at the moment. Really give it a try up to second season.
  • npagkalos
  • Apr 9, 2019
  • Permalink
8/10

Enjoyable series.

So what that the series is historically inaccurate. It's still entertaining to me. I loved Vikings and didnt know squat about their history. Point being,the writing is not the best but the acting is good. Put some quality writers with these actors,you'll have a top notch show. Knights Templar has always been a romantic story of men fighting for the good. So this woman looks at it from this angle.
  • macfaefan
  • Feb 22, 2019
  • Permalink
7/10

Hit and miss but just enough to be worthwhile

At tones it can be monotonously slow but when it clicks into gear it can really work the best evidence of this was in the second half of season 2 and the season 1 finale. The rest of the time it varies between average and good but could work on it's overall pacing. There is a lot worse out there and I personally overall enjoyed it and hope to see a 3rd season as it appears to be improving and learning from past mistakes as the cast grow into their roles with experience.
  • muamba_eats_toast
  • Dec 25, 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

uneven muddled writing

In 1291 Acre, the Templar Knights lose their last foothold in the Holy Lands and the Holy Grail sinks to the bottom of the sea. Fifteen years later in Paris, Brother Landry is a close confident to King Philip and Queen Joan of France. Isabella is their desirable daughter and William De Nogaret is their villainous advisor. Landry argues for a retaking of the Holy Lands. Master Godfrey is killed leaving a clue to the Grail. Pope Boniface VIII makes Landry the new Temple Master as the quest for the Grail begins.

It's a clunky mix of history and melodrama. Tom Cullen has the beard and the quiet intensity. I'm not sold on his leading man credentials. The writing is too muddled. For much of the show, the hero is tilting at windmills. The opposition is so powerful that the premise seems hopeless. That's not a fun place to live and this is not actually a fun show. While it has its moments, this show is too uneven to maintain any momentum. Like everybody else, History Channel tried its hand at scripted drama. With all the other streaming services, I'm sure that this got lost in the shuffle.
  • SnoopyStyle
  • May 24, 2020
  • Permalink
10/10

Great show if you discount historical innaccuracy

First of all, every negative review that's based on historical inaccuracy is correct. This show has absolutely nothing in common with the actual history of the Knights Templar. However, as a history buff and enthusiast I'm a bit perplexed by the outrage. The show and its commercials never tried to portray the show as historically accurate. So in my opinion, the negative reviews based on historical inaccuracy have no merit.

This show follows on the foot of vikings. Its supposed to be a show based on the Knights Templar but that's where the similarities end. What I judge a show by is cohesive plot, characters acting logically to drive the plot, entertainment value and acting. For the most part the show does a great job in all those categories. The only glaring negative point about the show is that the plot is a bit predictable sometimes. Otherwise, its great entertainment. I give the show a solid 8.5/10. The 10 rating from above is to balance out all the unjustified low ratings.
  • griffon652
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • Permalink
6/10

Would have really impressed me...when I was 8 years old. Ok, but not a hit like "Vikings"

  • keelhaul-80856
  • Oct 28, 2018
  • Permalink
9/10

This isn't a documentary

It is However a very entertaining show loosely based on historical figures. Give it a whirl. I find it extremely entertaing and now that Mark Hamill has joined the cast I expect to be even more entertained.
  • jtkirk161
  • Mar 30, 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

Not quite what I expected

  • Hairy_Scot
  • Dec 7, 2017
  • Permalink
3/10

Here's the Fallout From Knightfall

  • lavatch
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • Permalink
8/10

Give this show a chance

Very good show. Not sure why critics don't like it. The action is top notch, has high production values and a good plot to boot. Give it a chance and you might be surprised
  • juliomaguera
  • Feb 23, 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

Cheap effects and so-so acting makes this one a complete disappointment

Well, just started with this series, since I like history in general and well, Vikings is one of my top shows these days so I said, "why not?".

First of all, actors are in meh in general; I didn't believe them when telling their stories.

Special effects are so lame that I can compare them to those seen in those low-budget movies that have similar names to blockbusters and come out a little earlier but are complete garbage (i.e., Operation Dunkirk http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6836772).

I will give it a second chance and continue watching the episodes, but I don't feel engaged enough, though.
  • my-647-826944
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

Guess the trope

  • bloopville
  • Oct 28, 2018
  • Permalink

cheesy, easy, not very exciting

I am mostly easy or forgiving when is comes to historic series, especially when they are done with care for scenery, dialogues and eye for detail of sets. The very first half hour of the pilot I got bored with religion, Christian or Jewish, and the simple mindedness about good and evil. throw in bad camera work and not very good (or bad) acting and what I was left with was disappointment. Not getting that feel of a good knight series which should be out there alongside the current viking and cowboy and other fantasy more-or-less-based-on-reality series.
  • hmhagen
  • Dec 7, 2017
  • Permalink
7/10

The title shoud be more like "Queen's boyfriend and The evil plots of De Nogaret"

  • miguelfpinto
  • Jan 5, 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

So much more potential

Yeah I get they wanted intrigue. I think they've jumped the shark with the female Asian assassin. Because yeah that's so totally not Hollywood.
  • boydpeters
  • Jun 9, 2019
  • Permalink
10/10

I do not care

I do not care if it is historically correct. Nice show. Nice plot twists. Some nice philosophical and theological thought triggers.
  • h2ox3
  • Mar 28, 2019
  • Permalink
7/10

The first season is meh. So far the second season 👍

I didn't care much for the first season. It was pretty boring and pointless. This season has already topped the first season and it's only two episodes in.
  • KOOLAIDBRO
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • Permalink
10/10

Fun to watch if you make it past the first episode

The first episode is not the best. Too many characters, nothing explained, King Arthur's grail? But by the end of Episode 3, I was hooked. The plot moves quickly with action, intrigue, a mystery to solve, medieval France (set a bit earlier than Braveheart), so pretty fun and entertaining. This show is not deep and the "twists" are easy to see coming. But the actors really sell it and the sets are great. And I like that all the main characters have lots of "gray", not all good, not all bad. I'm a sucker for historical shows so looking forward to finishing the season!
  • danielle-a-powers
  • Jan 9, 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

Drama, Action, Intrigues, Sex and a cheesy love story - What's not to like? :)

I'm currently on episode 6 of Knightfall, and i must say; I have been well entertained so far!

If you can look past the historical inaccuracies and the occasional lazy writing - Knightfall is actually a quit entertaining ride..

Defiantly not a masterpiece, but one of those shows were you can turn your brain off and just enjoy a straight forward story, the occasional surprising twist of events and sometimes have a laugh when the writing is overly simplified and the characters do some seriously questionable things.. Like for an example, the boy that just lost his wife in a brutal way, falls in love again soon after in a girl he's only known for like a min! (That's lazy writing to me)..

If you watch Knightfall, don't expect a grand historical drama, but rather a fairly enjoyable Action/drama with historical elements!

Have fun everyone :)
  • CapraIbex
  • Jan 14, 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

A crime against History

When people say sad things like "historical accuracy doesn't matter in entertainment" shows like knightfall are the result. History is rich and vibrant, full of humanity's glories and misdeeds, by making knights that contradict historical knights you make characters that are less believable, a story that is less immersive and a plot that just feels poorly recycled. Even taken on its own merits the show is poor, but to do this to such a fascinating group as the templars is just wrong
  • borismk-38942
  • Dec 14, 2017
  • Permalink
8/10

Underrated

Yes, it is predictable if you overthink it while watching instead of enjoying the experience. So if you start watching it with the intention of wanting to think of it as bad like some people here seem to do you wont enjoy it.

If you however start watching it without prejudices you'll enjoy a great and well acted show with beautiful detailed costumes and settings that feel like they're straight of of the time itself.
  • sdricportal
  • Dec 29, 2017
  • Permalink
6/10

really bad but compulsive viewing

Ok there is 2 things you need to know about this show

1 it is really bad and

2 it is compulsive viewing

I have to hand it to the script writers, they are off their heads.

I nearly quit after the first episode, such was my disappointment, I wish they had not used the Knights Templar as their premise for the show as it makes a mockery of this historical order, but, once I realised that this has no actual bearing in fact, I got over it.

Maybe they should have called this, men with beards and swords.

Just think period drama with a lot of sword fighting with nonsensical plot twists poor continuity and every cliché you can think of.

It is more like a Arthurian saga, I am sure they stole some of the Knights names from the legends, it is likely that the script writer does not know the difference between the Knights of king Arthur and the Knights Templar, as from a historical POV they do not seem to have any degree of knowledge on this subject

It is a pity they did not try a little bit harder with the plot as the sets and action sequences are pretty good, never the less it is still watchable if only to see how stupid the plots are, at times it is cringeworthy but it always somehow redeems itself enough to remain watchable in an OMG that was predictable kind of way.

A crazy show where the script writers get to indulge themselves with plots that have no basis in fact or reality - it is completely audacious, off the wall stupid.

sometimes something is so bad that it is good.
  • ddrddr
  • Apr 4, 2019
  • Permalink
3/10

A Two Edged Sword

I like a mystery and the fictional Universe doesn't really matter - when i saw a trailer about a the legendary Templar i thought to myself " This might be a show i might enjoy " The acting was great, but the story line for a first episode was a disaster. It felt like a was watching another disastrous Hollywood remake without a story line moving the story forward and instead an action filled driven narrative.

And the worst part - they raped mythology in the very first episode. They hired C-rated writers who pitched a concept, but without a storyteller.

Scenery, effects, actors and acting - *All great

Writers - *A total disaster
  • rgme
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • Permalink

Not historic, but fun to watch.

Whole the "history" is questionable at best , the action and story are fast paced and riveting. blood, lust , intrigue, all you need for a great adventure series. Just remember its fantasy and go with the flow.
  • copperhead-48473
  • Dec 23, 2017
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.