In the year 2033, a young girl trapped in a mysterious orphanage recklessly travels back in time to find her parents and amend her past.In the year 2033, a young girl trapped in a mysterious orphanage recklessly travels back in time to find her parents and amend her past.In the year 2033, a young girl trapped in a mysterious orphanage recklessly travels back in time to find her parents and amend her past.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Batya Cruz
- Instructor
- (as Batya Haynes)
Featured reviews
There are time travel flicks that are good, and those that are terrible. Then there's this type, which is just jumbled. Typical trope: girl goes into the past to find her unknown family. The thing different in this one is that she is fully aware of the three different possibilities in time travel... and pretty much throws them all out the window just 'cos she really really wants to do this. Messed up jumbled stuff follows, as would be expected.
To give an idea without spoilers, see if anyone can answer this question: WHY did (unnamed character) try to shoot her at the beginning? I found no. Reason. Whatsoever. Throughout the entire film for that scene. I'm sure the writer and director knew why, but it sure didn't come across in the film.
See... in movies... the idea is for the director to let the audience in on what's happening and why. There's not much of that here.
The plot was interesting enough to maintain attention, but it somewhat screamed "amateur hour" all the way through. The ending is predictable (can't say more because of spoilers), but at the same time they just leave things hanging at the end... and the ending is fairly abrupt without even a clue as to what might happen next. Many reviewers have commented on this, and they're right.
If I wanted to invent my own ending, I'd write my own script... and I could probably do a better job than this flick.
Some of the acting is halfway decent. Some is half-baked. The script is pretty disjointed. The kinda-twist ending viewers see coming way ahead of time.
You can save time in your own life by giving this one a pass.
To give an idea without spoilers, see if anyone can answer this question: WHY did (unnamed character) try to shoot her at the beginning? I found no. Reason. Whatsoever. Throughout the entire film for that scene. I'm sure the writer and director knew why, but it sure didn't come across in the film.
See... in movies... the idea is for the director to let the audience in on what's happening and why. There's not much of that here.
The plot was interesting enough to maintain attention, but it somewhat screamed "amateur hour" all the way through. The ending is predictable (can't say more because of spoilers), but at the same time they just leave things hanging at the end... and the ending is fairly abrupt without even a clue as to what might happen next. Many reviewers have commented on this, and they're right.
If I wanted to invent my own ending, I'd write my own script... and I could probably do a better job than this flick.
Some of the acting is halfway decent. Some is half-baked. The script is pretty disjointed. The kinda-twist ending viewers see coming way ahead of time.
You can save time in your own life by giving this one a pass.
This note contains NO spoilers because I don't know what it was about.
Oh my. Did I really spend time watching his pathetic excuse for entertainment? Yes, unfortunately. This was a pointless, badly dialogued, badly acted, mishmash of a film.
It was so incredibly bad I don't know how I have found so much to write about !
Oh my. Did I really spend time watching his pathetic excuse for entertainment? Yes, unfortunately. This was a pointless, badly dialogued, badly acted, mishmash of a film.
It was so incredibly bad I don't know how I have found so much to write about !
This movie had promise, it was decent acting for some, and the photography was good, but the mistakes were in the story. The plot, what little there was, just fell apart. While I can suspend disbelief for the science, I can't for a plot that didn't go anywhere, and left you pissed and confused. Like other reviewers said, it's not My job to "come to my own conclusions". Where everything could have been concluded, instead the scriptwriter chose to leave you in a murky fog, with no conclusion or end to the story. I fully expected a "to be continued" script at the end, because that's what it felt like. There was no point to the 90 minutes of buildup. There was no end to let the viewer leave the theater happy with having watched this. I finished it going "is that it, where's the fkg ending?" I can't rate this title high, it just wasn't worth the time invested for a feeling of being let down.
I think to keep the short I will just say: Story concept = Good
Execution of concept =Baaaaaad !!!
Did you know
- How long is Collider?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 24 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content