A probing look into the potential future of "thought policing" through the headline-making case of the NYPD "Cannibal Cop," who was charged with conspiring to kidnap and eat women.A probing look into the potential future of "thought policing" through the headline-making case of the NYPD "Cannibal Cop," who was charged with conspiring to kidnap and eat women.A probing look into the potential future of "thought policing" through the headline-making case of the NYPD "Cannibal Cop," who was charged with conspiring to kidnap and eat women.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
James A. Cohen
- Self
- (as James Cohen)
Alan Dershowitz
- Self
- (as Alan M. Dershowitz)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
After being charged with conspiracy and having a judge overturn it... it sort of COMPLETLY undermines THREAT LAWS. Your not allowed to threaten Death to another person.. but is it only a threat if you tell the person you're threatening? What if you told everyone in SoCal media that you wanted to murder a politician... you'd be charged with uttering threats.. maybe not conspiracy unless you had an actual plan in play.. but the threat is real... had he not been exposed would he have gone through with it? Unknown.. just like the threat of death on another person.. it still was a threat.
Very good documentary. But it's chilly how this man doesn't seem regretful at all. He just feels regretful that he got caught. It's one thing to have fantasy, but the fact that he was using his power as police to stalk and research for these women?
And at which point shouldn't people be not responsible for planning and talking about it online.
And at which point shouldn't people be not responsible for planning and talking about it online.
Erin Lee Carr is quickly becoming one of my favourite documentarians. Everything I've watched that has been directed by her is an incredibly ride.
This case in particular looks at the case of 'thought crimes' and when such a thing turns from a fantasy, into a reality.
I'm still caught up about how to feel about the 'Cannibal Cop'. While using police databases to collect information on potential victims is truly disturbing and clearly crossing a line; the perpetrator never physically did anything.
Despite which side of the fence you stand on, this documentary does an incredible job at telling both sides of the story, and never feels like it's dragging on.
I'll certainly be viewing more of Ms. Carr's library.
This case in particular looks at the case of 'thought crimes' and when such a thing turns from a fantasy, into a reality.
I'm still caught up about how to feel about the 'Cannibal Cop'. While using police databases to collect information on potential victims is truly disturbing and clearly crossing a line; the perpetrator never physically did anything.
Despite which side of the fence you stand on, this documentary does an incredible job at telling both sides of the story, and never feels like it's dragging on.
I'll certainly be viewing more of Ms. Carr's library.
No on mentions at any point that this conviction should only be happening because he's a cop. They should be held to a higher standard than the general population. This documentary paints a victimized picture of this "man" who knew what he was doing and what he job was a made a bad decision. Stop equating fetishism to serial killers and rapists!
"Thought Crimes: The Case of the Cannibal Cop" (2015 release; 88 min.) is a documentary about NY cop Gilberto Valle. As the movie opens, we see Valle participating in a chatroom, having "ugly thoughts" about what he'd to to certain women. We then go back in time as we get to know Valle, a New York cop with a lovely wife and young daughter. When his wife discovers (through spyware) what Valle has been doing while on the computer, she contacts the police, and Valle is arrested for conspiring to kidnap. Did Valle cross the lien between free thought and punishable action? At this point we are 10 min. into the documentary, you'll just have to see for yourself how it all plays out.
Couple of comments: this was the first feature-length documentary from producer-director Erin Lee Carr. I recently watch her more recent work (2017's Mommy Dead and Dearest, and this year's outstanding At the Heart of Gold: Inside the USA Gymnastics Scandal and equally riveting I Love You, Now Die), which establish Carr as one of the country's best documentarians, period. For her debut feature-length, Carr looks at the infamous "Cannibal Cop" case, which presents a tough legal issue: where does one cross the blurry line between free thoughts (you can literally think the most ugly and repulsive thoughts as long as you don't act on it) and punishable actions. It appears that many reviewers here (and of course the jury) are not able to look beyond the ugly and disgusting thoughts of this despicable man. The theme of "thought police" have been explored before, including in "1984" and Steven Spielberg's "Minority Report", but it's once thing to see it in a fictional setting, it is quite another to be confronted with an actual real life scenario. Please note that since this documentary was released in May, 2015,, the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled on the appeal in December of that year (not going to spoil it, but you can easily look up the court's ruling).
Bottom line: this is not an easy documentary to watch because of the underlying disturbing nature. But it would establish Carr as an up-and-coming true crime documentarian, and her reputation has only grown with subsequent documentaries she has made. Meanwhile, I'd readily suggest you check out "Thought Crimes", be it on VOD or on DVD/Blu-ray, and draw your own conclusion.
Couple of comments: this was the first feature-length documentary from producer-director Erin Lee Carr. I recently watch her more recent work (2017's Mommy Dead and Dearest, and this year's outstanding At the Heart of Gold: Inside the USA Gymnastics Scandal and equally riveting I Love You, Now Die), which establish Carr as one of the country's best documentarians, period. For her debut feature-length, Carr looks at the infamous "Cannibal Cop" case, which presents a tough legal issue: where does one cross the blurry line between free thoughts (you can literally think the most ugly and repulsive thoughts as long as you don't act on it) and punishable actions. It appears that many reviewers here (and of course the jury) are not able to look beyond the ugly and disgusting thoughts of this despicable man. The theme of "thought police" have been explored before, including in "1984" and Steven Spielberg's "Minority Report", but it's once thing to see it in a fictional setting, it is quite another to be confronted with an actual real life scenario. Please note that since this documentary was released in May, 2015,, the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled on the appeal in December of that year (not going to spoil it, but you can easily look up the court's ruling).
Bottom line: this is not an easy documentary to watch because of the underlying disturbing nature. But it would establish Carr as an up-and-coming true crime documentarian, and her reputation has only grown with subsequent documentaries she has made. Meanwhile, I'd readily suggest you check out "Thought Crimes", be it on VOD or on DVD/Blu-ray, and draw your own conclusion.
Did you know
- TriviaOne of the chat room users is known as Moody Blues. This screen name is a reference to The Moody Blues, an English progressive rock band originally from Birmingham.
- ConnectionsFeatures 1984 (1956)
- How long is Thought Crimes: The Case of the Cannibal Cop?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 21 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Thought Crimes: The Case of the Cannibal Cop (2015) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer