Panama

2022
R
1h 35m

IMDb RATING

3.5/10

4.3K

YOUR RATING

Mel Gibson and Cole Hauser in Panama (2022)

An ex-marine is hired by a defense contractor to travel to Panama to complete an arms deal. In the process he becomes involved with the U.S. invasion of Panama, and learns an important lesson about the true nature of political power.

Play trailer1:50

2 Videos

91 Photos

Conspiracy Thriller Political Thriller Action Thriller

An ex-marine is hired by a defense contractor to travel to Panama to complete an arms deal. In the process he becomes involved with the U.S. invasion of Panama, and learns an important lesso... Read allAn ex-marine is hired by a defense contractor to travel to Panama to complete an arms deal. In the process he becomes involved with the U.S. invasion of Panama, and learns an important lesson about the true nature of political power.An ex-marine is hired by a defense contractor to travel to Panama to complete an arms deal. In the process he becomes involved with the U.S. invasion of Panama, and learns an important lesson about the true nature of political power.

See production info at IMDbPro

IMDb RATING

3.5/10

4.3K

YOUR RATING

See production info at IMDbPro

Videos2

Photos91

+ 85

User reviews110

3.54.2K

Featured reviews

1paulmckeown-11060

Terrible movie, waste of time

Where was the plot, the story was all over the place and the acting woeful ,why was this even made...a low budget film not worthy of being on the screen, avoid at all cost.

4imseeg

About 15 executive producers made this movie. What a mess. What a cheap, cliche surrogate of a supposedly action thriller.

Mel Gibson was the reason I had to watch it. He hasnt got a big part in this movie though, which is mostly filled with B/C-listed actors, who usually would only star in cheap tv series.

From the very start I felt everything was wrong with this movie: the photography was boring, no thrilling action whatsoever, very cheaply filmed. The sound score is just wrong. Of course the acting is mediocre at best. And finally the story is an incomprehensible mess.

Not any good then? Well, it's not completely garbage. They made an (amateurish) effort, but an effort nonetheless. But it is tedious, incredibly tedious to watch.

1confidential-67897

Shockingly terrible

Only watched because I like Cole in Yellowstone. Where do I start, load music played over every conversation, you can't hear a word people are saying. It looks like it may been filmed using an iPhone 1, camera is constantly shaking. No plot to speak of, but that may be because I had to stop watching 30 mins in. Do not waste your time.

3dongillette1

Bush League

The one thing I can say about Mel Gibson is that unlike Bruce Willis, he still brings his "A" game when he's trying to make a buck, but the rest of these no-acting clowns wouldn't make it in a high school play.

Really amateurish acting, stupid effects in the fight scenes, and chock full of goofy, you should steer clear of this one.

5eongamerdude

Not as bad as they say but not that good either

Not nearly a 3 score for me. More like 5.

Then again, I personally am not a hater and dislike every film.

The film has major flaws. But Mel Gibson and Cole Hauser are awesome.

I think it was marketed so badly because it leads you to believe it's more action than it really is.

It's espionage and a little bit of action.

This is a turn-your-brain-off film.

I recommend for fans of Cole Hauser.

5/10.

More like this

5.7

6.0

4.1

5.3

5.9

5.5

3.6

Brouille$ et embrouille$

4.1

4.3

5.4

3.9

3.7

Confidential Informant

Storyline

Edit

Did you know

Edit

Trivia
Morgan Freeman and Frank Grillo were originally cast.

Goofs
The plot partially revolves around the purchase of a soviet helicopter, but the helicopter that eventually is shown is an American Blackhawk.

Quotes
Stark: Let me tell you something: There's nothing more rock N Roll than takin out the bad guys for the Red, White and Blue.

Crazy credits
The credits run for nearly 5 minutes.

Alternate versions
The UK release was cut, cut required to remove a scene of deliberate animal cruelty staged for the film, in order to obtain a 15 classification. Cut was made in accordance with BBFC Guidelines, policy, and the Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act, 1937, which is applied in accordance with the Video Recordings Act, 1984. An uncut classification was not available.