[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
Paul Hubschmid and Viveca Lindfors in No Time for Flowers (1952)

Review by bjhex1

No Time for Flowers

5/10

It's No Ninotchka

Dispel any notions that this movie shares any resemblance to Ninotchka beyond the purely superficial. It lacks the wit, humor and charm of the Ernst Lubitsch and Billy Wilder classic film.

Viveca Lindfors is pleasant enough, but lacks the gravitas of Garbo, and the male lead isn't a patch on Melvyn Douglas. And though the comic relief in the roles of the father and forlorn suitor are probably the best parts of the movie, unfortunately, one can't help but yearn for Iranoff, Buljanoff and Kopalski. But the biggest difference is the attitude toward women. Whereas Ninotchka is a devoted, honest and strong ideological woman softened by love, Anna is portrayed as a brainwashed follower who is deprogrammed to adhere (quite willingly) to her more acceptable feminine nature. Politics certainly plays a part in that distinction, but the expectations for gender roles is in stark contrast.

But enough of the inevitably unfavorable comparisons. The story is harmless enough, but even as broad comedy, never quite gels. Plot progression occurs a bit too easily and never really compels viewers to root for anyone, beyond the rather generic goal escaping the clutches of an authoritarian Czechoslovakian regime. Even when it tries to be noir-ish, it can only provide a thin veneer, evidenced by the dubious conclusion. Only 83 minutes and I was looking at my watch, that's really all one should need to know.
  • bjhex1
  • May 27, 2023

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.