[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
IMDbPro
Model (1981)

Review by paullochroku

Model

5/10

As a slice of late 70's early 80's life in NYC

The cars, the buses the clothes, the lack of tech (everything is analog, and no phones/tablets/bluetooth/wifi)

It works as a time capsule of a bygone era, when there were newsstands and 100's of magazines, and plenty of work for models and photographers and support staff (lights, wardrobe, makeup, gaffers) and dozens of model agencies in NYC. Now that fashion magazines with fashions ads and newsstands at every corner are long in the past, these jobs don't exist anymore.

Besides that these various jobs around models and fashion models (or used to) exist, and they revolve around repetitive tasks, there's not much beyond that in this doc.

I wish it were more like the Wiseman's other docs, where you can determine who these people were (especially the models, who all come off as very vapid pretty faces), and how well they were actually doing their jobs. I don't know who was good or bad at their job, unlike his other docs I've seen. I'd love to know something at stake for the "perfect" shot or cover vs. Just good enough. What a "perfect" image meant to magazine sales or ad revenue.

Overall a disappointment, seeing how some of his earlier work I've seen are darn near perfect.
  • paullochroku
  • Aug 11, 2022

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.