It's OUR son!
It should be pointed out that Marcel Pagnol's movie was filmed during the first combats which lead to the 1940 defeat and Pétain's Armistice .It was the first film released in the free zone which was shown in the occupied one in 1941; its success was huge. Just to say that in 2011 ,it has not the same meaning for the audience.
It was not the first time a Pagnol 's movie had been remade in his own country ;Claude Berri remade "Manon des sources " which he divided into two parts , considerably reducing the central role of the schoolteacher ;Auteuil was featured in Berri's film ,so it was only natural that he tackled "la fille du puisatier".
That said ,taking on Raimu's and Fernandel's parts was a challenge ; Auteuil's movie doesn't make them forget , it was insurmountable to surpass these monstres sacrés.
His movie is faithfull to its model ,it's shorter ,which is not a bad thing, for the 1940 work dragged on sometimes ;it was also impossible to transfer it to our era ,for the melodramatic side is obsolete today .
Auteuil adopts a welcome provençal accent ,so does Kad Merad :both actors are as efficient in comedy as in drama ;the same can be said about the excellent Darroussin(taking on Charpin's role) and Sabine Azema but they do not have any accent (because it sounds too prole ?)Azema has a tendency to overact .Auteuil's son portrays his grandson !
The cinematography is impeccable ,taking advantage of the provençal landscapes,where Patricia wanders (the first one ,Josette Day ("la belle et la bête",was IMHO more gracious and had a better way to wear the hat ); it's a good work ,useful to introduce Pagnol to the new generations (colors help),but I hope they 'll try and see the black and white one.
It was not the first time a Pagnol 's movie had been remade in his own country ;Claude Berri remade "Manon des sources " which he divided into two parts , considerably reducing the central role of the schoolteacher ;Auteuil was featured in Berri's film ,so it was only natural that he tackled "la fille du puisatier".
That said ,taking on Raimu's and Fernandel's parts was a challenge ; Auteuil's movie doesn't make them forget , it was insurmountable to surpass these monstres sacrés.
His movie is faithfull to its model ,it's shorter ,which is not a bad thing, for the 1940 work dragged on sometimes ;it was also impossible to transfer it to our era ,for the melodramatic side is obsolete today .
Auteuil adopts a welcome provençal accent ,so does Kad Merad :both actors are as efficient in comedy as in drama ;the same can be said about the excellent Darroussin(taking on Charpin's role) and Sabine Azema but they do not have any accent (because it sounds too prole ?)Azema has a tendency to overact .Auteuil's son portrays his grandson !
The cinematography is impeccable ,taking advantage of the provençal landscapes,where Patricia wanders (the first one ,Josette Day ("la belle et la bête",was IMHO more gracious and had a better way to wear the hat ); it's a good work ,useful to introduce Pagnol to the new generations (colors help),but I hope they 'll try and see the black and white one.
- ulicknormanowen
- Aug 20, 2022