Review by dshell102

While this is a great example of a trial, it does nothing to refute the evidence in my mind and just shows how weak the defense was. The way it's presented is similar to trial - evidence against her followed by rebuttal. It shows my clearly why they lost the trial.

Evidence is pointed out of glass over the footprints. A lack of grief. Coincidences of money. The response is "maybe this, maybe that" and it's hours and hours of evidence, not just one or two things. The defense wasn't strong. No actual contradicting evidence. Nothing disproved. It's a sad situation, it's especially sad if she's innocent, but wow! Everything from her mental state to how she lived to evidence at the scene to the vast difference in knife wounds. I'm looking for signs of innocence, but how they sat down with the nurses isn't evidence of innocence, just how the prosecution prepped. A great deal of evidence of guilt, though. Claims of "no motive" and "her character was the centerpiece"....I don't find them to be very honest. Money is a motive. Lots of evidence had me leaning toward guilt long before her character was brouht up. It's all for show, I get it, but to those of us who think it's awful deception.

So yes, this is what a trial is like. And so far I haven't found anything that indicates innocence.