Fun science-based disaster movie
Path of Destruction was entertaining and had a plot that made sense within itself, so there's not much more you can ask for in a television movie. The nanobots idea is far-fetched, but it is loosely based on stuff I've seen in Scientific American. And isn't that what a sci-fi movie is all about? Making up a story that's not real and then taking it seriously? If you don't like that then don't watch sci-fi. I'm a big Star Trek and Stargate fan, so I accept far-fetched stories quite easily. My measure is if the far-fetched premise is true to itself. In Path of Destruction, the premise was true to itself. Also, Danica is beautiful and gave it her all, Chris Pratt was very good, and Stephen Furst provided the levity.
A fun movie to get on DVD or check out on television. Not perfect due to the budget, but not bad at all either.
A fun movie to get on DVD or check out on television. Not perfect due to the budget, but not bad at all either.
- chris-bruins00
- Mar 1, 2006