When I first saw this flick, I thought it was 20 years ahead of its time.
When I first saw this flick, I thought it was 20 years ahead of its time. Nine years later, I'd like to review the "20" part of it. Say "30" instead. It was an important flick for me. A reflection on cinema, reality and time. I remember reading a "Letter to the editor" in the local paper (La Presse) in which the "reader" expressed his disgust for the film. Nothing is disgusting about it. "Challenging" maybe. "Disturbing". Never "Disgusting", unless one is disgusting by the story of a young woman spreading an imaginary mortal sexually transmissible disease for the local doctor to prosper.
Of course, since and before, other experiences were made, but this one is not to be overlooked. A must.
Of course, since and before, other experiences were made, but this one is not to be overlooked. A must.
- patate-2
- Mar 8, 2000