Avaliações de usuários

I enjoyed this. The idea wasn't terrifically new or groundbreaking, but I felt the writers gave some depth to the storyline and the actors were down to pull it off. The jump scares irritated me because I felt it cheapened the film...you don't have to make a loud, obnoxious noises to let you know something is scary, because the characters drove and sold the story. They should have stuck with the dramatic, "slow burn" aspect because they had the talent. But overall, it was well acted, directed and scripted and it was a breath of fresh air for this horror fan. I think some reviewers were a little harsh on this. It had a few flaws but was worth seeing IMO if you adore horror.

In Los Angeles, the video editor Miles Grisson (Clark Freeman) is a man with many phobias inclusive he does not drive. When Miles has several nightmares with his death, he decides to offer a $ 30,000 reward for anyone that proves the existence of a ghost, or demon, or angel and consequently the afterlife. His protective mother Charlotte Grisson (Annette O'Toole) reads the news and comes to his apartment. Miles receives more than one thousand correspondences and together with his mother, they analyze the responses and they end with three candidates. The first one is Dr. Ellison (John Glover) but Charlotte finds that he is a fraud. The second one is the medium Josephina (Giovanna Zacarías) that tells that Bill asked him to stop his search. However Charlotte again tells that Josephine is a fraud. The third one is an entrepreneur but Miles finds that he is a con-man. When Miles receives a mysterious phone call from a man called Nelson (Jay Dunn), he schedules an encounter with him in a park near the airport. Soon he learns that there are doors that should never be opened.

"We Go on" is an intriguing and original ghost story. The screenplay is well-written with many plot points and the cast is excellent, with great performances of the veteran Annete O'Toole and Clark Freeman. The supernatural story is interesting and the encounter of Nelson and Miles is the scariest moment of this good film. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): Not Available

People who are interested in the paranormal will love this film.

Essentially this movie works on the premise that ghosts are everywhere, we just don't always encounter them.

Miles suffers from a range of phobias linked to an ongoing mental health issue. At first we don't understand how and why Miles ended up getting sick but we know he's grieving from the death of his father.

Miles' mother is intensely over protective and as the plot develops we discover that she's been keeping the truth of her husbands death from her son.

What follows is less of a horror film and more of an evaluation of the idea that the spirits of the dead inhabit our world and continue to do so for a while before moving on.

It's very much a traditional ghost story in this regard, an almost Victorian idea that the spirits are seeking absolution in death for some misdemeanour they committed in life.

This could of been a boring film were it not for Miles learning to live with his dead ghost in a way that's closer to ancestor worship.

The story is one of how we all carry our own ghosts with us and how we relate to our unconscious dead selves.

A really interesting film, with a watch.

One of the most interesting films on a supernatural theme that I've seen in a long time. The movie keeps you intrigued to the very end, you're never quite sure where it's going and it has several surprises up its sleeve.

It's not really horror but don't let that deter you from seeing it otherwise you will miss a true gem. The film is very well acted by all, especially the leads Annette O'Toole and Clark Freeman. BTW Ms O'Toole's face looked really familiar but I couldn't recall from where. Then it hit me! She was Lana Lang in Superman III and Beverley in the 1990 version of It.

To sum up, I loved this film and I think you will too. Go on, give it a chance, you'll be pleased you did.

A man who is scared of just about everything in the world, but most afraid of dying, searches for proof that life after death exists out there. Offering a $30,000.00 reward for any evidance, he begins interviewing people in search for the truth.

When all reliable avenuess fail him, he reaches out to a mysterious caller who claims he can show him ghosts. From there, things escalate out of control.

Have you ever browsed the b-horror film section of your local rental places in the late 90's and early 2000's? Every once and awhile you'll find a gem, hidden in the rough.

We Go on is one such gem.

The cinematography is passable. The actors were believable and the audio and musical scores were accetable. The story, while stunted in some parts is still enjoyable enough to warrant a full watch without being boring.

...for another feature from auteurs Holland and Mitton, the guys who brought us YellowBrickRoad. They've upped their game for this paranormal quest tale, despite it still being another low budget affair. An effective Annette "Smallville" O'Toole lends name recognition, but protagonist Clark "YellowBrickRoad" Freeman carries his weight with assurance, along with the likes of John "Smallville" Glover, Giovanna "On the Road" Zacarías, and the rest of a solid ensemble. The writing is trim and tight, the story well thought out, the score appropriate. Indies of this sort usually fall apart at some point, but this one doesn't. Definitely one of the better sleepers I've found at the library in recent memory. No ground-breaker, but still solid genre entertainment.

Very low budget and extremely disappointing film that offers the premise of a good story but gives you precious little.Looks like it was shot on video. A complete waste of the talents of Annette O'Toole and especially John Glover.I wonder if i watched the same film that other reviewers praise here, because i can't see it. This is a poor film, not scary, not moving, not much of anything.

Seeing this with very low expectations, I was first waiting it to fall on its face but soon realised the writing, acting and direction was all sure-footed and I'd even say innovative. On the outset, Annette O'Toole and Clark Freeman make an unlikely mother-son couple but they sold their roles and even made me emotional at times.

The budget is indeed tiny, but it didn't take anything away from the solid creepiness. Build-up was executed well, and the story moved nicely from almost comedy to genuine scares. Even at the end this little horror surprise stood its ground and avoided the usual sour taste that most films in its genre leave behind.

"Once you see what I'm gonna show you, you're kind of gonna be in the inner circle on this thing, and…well… you'll be open to it. To them."

Everyone knows the famous phrase "I see dead people" from the unparalleled movie "The Sixth Sense". Of course, you can't compare "We go on" with the latter. But in a way, it reminds you of it. Not that this one is terrifying and filled with heart attack causing jump-scares. So for those who think a horror movie is about demonic appearances, a multitude of bloodthirsty zombies or a psychopathic freak who slaughters innocent girls, be warned. This isn't such a typical horror movie. To be honest, I thought the human interactions between Charlotte (Annette O'Toole) and Miles (Clark Freeman) were the most amusing in this film. And the story itself can be called original as well.

Miles is someone who suffers from all sort of phobias. And this because of his father's deadly car accident when he was very young. Thus he fears to drive a car, he fears open spaces, he's afraid of heights and he hates rotting things. Obviously he's also afraid of dying. Should I list all the Latin names for these phobias, there's a chance that some readers would grow a phobia to read my reviews. In other words, Miles is a real scared guy. The cure he comes up with, is on the one hand fairly inventive and on the other hand also kind of naive. If someone can prove to him there's life after death by showing him a ghost or a spirit, Miles thinks he might be able to lead a normal life.

A page-sized advertisement in the newspaper is used to draw the necessary attention. I'm sure the $ 30,000 reward is the reason why a lot of individuals offered their help. Of course there are charlatans, scammers and quacks among them. And that's where Miles's mother Charlotte, comes into the picture and starts helping her son with the difficult quest to find credible candidates. Even though she is convinced it's all nonsense. Eventually there remain three candidates. The question is whether these people can help Miles. You need to watch the movie to find out yourself though. It's only halfway the movie it gets interesting and the atmosphere becomes more sinister. And this after meeting Nelson (Jay Dunn), a seemingly dead normal guy who works as a maintenance man at the airport. He will help Miles to get in touch with the thing Miles wishes to see.

As I said before, "We go on" isn't really creepy or frightening. But after meeting with Nelson, the film takes a whole different turn and turns into a pretty ghostly film. But generally, one tries to put more emphasis on the humorous side instead of making it creepy. Normally, I'm not I'm not so keen on humorous horrors. Usually it feels rather exaggerated with use of infantile humor and lot of mostly weak parodies of classic horrors. As in the "Scary movie" series. At first it's a bit funny, but after a while it starts to annoy me. In this movie, the humor is more subtle and at the same time ordinary. As if it wasn't meant to be funny. As if it just slipped in the movie by accident. I admit it. That's the kind of humor I appreciate the most. No forced knee-slappers where a laughter track is needed to let the audience know that something funny has happened.

The interaction between the two main characters is a pleasure to look at. Especially Annette O'Toole is fantastic. Both act in a spontaneous and natural way. At times it seemed as if they had a lifelike mother-son relationship. Grandiose, extremely funny and touching at the same time. For that reason they already earn a standing ovation. But the film itself deserves all praise as well. In a quirky way, the film succeeds in distinguishing itself from other ghost stories. Let me call "We go on" a horror for newbies. A fascinating supernatural story without bloody scenes and palpitations-causing scares. I am convinced that the non-lovers of horror will also enjoy this. I was pleasantly surprised by this low-budget flick.

More reviews here : http://bit.ly/2qtGQoc

Very well written, dialogue script is excellent. The actors are spot on and O'Toole is cracking. Like finding the odd true film in the VHS ranks of the old 80's video store. The directors need a big budget and will find proper fame. Enjoy, you will not be unhappy.

Our main character / man-child Miles wants to find evidence of life after death and is offering 30k to whom ever can prove it to him. Interesting premise, with terrible execution. I'd say 60 of the 89 minute runtime must be our protagonist starring off blankly into the distance. And he's got some serious parental dependency, I half-expected him to answer his phone "Yes, mommy?" At any given time. Movie gets 1 star for decent camera work on a very low budget. Otherwise, it's by-the-numbers "cut to screaming ghost" shots in an attempt to be scary. It's not. Random loud noises stopped being scary when I turned 4.

The structure of the script is quite good. The acting is overall very good, though the lead is a bit monotone. It's hard to play someone who is depressed and quiet and not have it be a bit dull or repetitive to watch and that's what happens here.

So we, the audience know, from the title and from our expectations that there will be some kind of supernatural elements to the film. So eventually this turns into a "I see dead people" type of film. And that's where it starts to have problems. The problem is the more dead people we, and he see, the less impact they have. So the second half of the film unwinds a bit instead of picking up.

Still it's an excellent working out of the idea as a script, if not delivered in a perfectly scary way. Sad to say it could have used better direction. Perhaps having two directors dilutes a more powerful execution, or perhaps a short shooting schedule or other issues prevented totally delivering on the potential of each scene so they all ad up to a good movie. Also it could use a better overall look. It lacks a creepy vibe and atmosphere as a whole.

It could have just turned into schlock which, though perhaps more exciting, in a routine kind of way, would have been too bad.

O Toole is excellent as the mom, as is John Glover--an actor who can ham it up too much--in a smaller role.

Nice use of a real Los Angeles abandoned location near the Airport and large-in-scope film. It's too bad it isn't better than it is as a whole but it could have been so much worse.

While it was a slow film in terms of overall pacing, it held my attention throughout. This could partly be due to the fact the wonderful Annette O'Toole has a prominent role.

I felt it got off yo a shaky, almost tongue-in-cheek start. Clark Freeman is endearing at the outset as Miles. But, his portrayal begins to grate a bit after a while, even though I understood the undercurrents of the character.

There really isn't much more to say about the film, which is the good and bad of it. 'We Go On' is not very memorable and it can only loosely be called 'horror.' To me, it's like the Hallmark Hall of Fame version of a scary movie.

The beginning of the film strikes all of the nihilistic tones that you tend to expect about horror movies related to death, but by the end, there's actually a much more light-hearted and joyful tone. As a religious person who tends to find that most horror films and media today lean towards the depressing end of secular thought, I was quite pleasantly surprised with this one. Likable characters, some good emotional moments, and a warm vibe throughout. Give it a watch, especially if you have Shudder!

I can't believe this has so many good reviews. The premise had potential, but the movie turned into a mish-mash of ideas from other movies, a meandering plot and some terrible acting, particularly by the lead role.

This is an interesting concept. After a near-death accident, a man offers a reward to anyone who can proof there is life after death. Only, sometimes its better not knowing. The film starts off as a drama with comedy elements here and there (Annette O'Toole is excellent as the really cool, determined mother). Clark Freeman is also very good as Miles, as he becomes emotionally involved in the afterlife. Miles' life also very quickly spirals out of control as reality starts to blur, and he becomes deeper entangled in the on-goings between the living and the dead.

The film features really good visuals, and some very creepy scenes. This is a film that probably will make you contemplate the "what if" scenario...

From looking at other reviewers it seems they have over rated this movie. Don't get me wrong it's not a bad movie, it's just not as good as they say.The acting is solid but plot lines seem rushed in order to progress the story resulting in unrealistic actions taking place. Scenes involving the interaction between Miles and his mother seem at odds with the story playing out making his mother's actions seem illogical and extreme. Other reviewers that have scored this movie down have highlighted these areas. I believe the movie could have made more with the material at hand and created more tension with little to no extra budget but it built up the story to the 45 minute mark and then it started to unwind somewhat I feel instead of ramping it up. The end was anti climatic and just left me feeling that the movie could have had a lot more potential which is a shame.

I liked this movie. Because I'm a fan of the horror genre I wanted to say this wasn't really a scary movie. It's spooky but there's no jump scares or blood or anything like that. This is more like a story of people who managed to cross over into another plane of existence & are in contact with the dead. They aren't happy about it or having a good time with it but this doesn't show you scenes of super bad demons either...more like unhappy spirits that can make your life miserable at times. I did enjoy it. It's worth seeing.

I admit to skipping this "Shudder Exclusive" a few times, but We Go On is a fantastic ghost story. The acting is great and the film is shot well, but most surprising is how well thought out the script was. Everything just works well, and any fan of supernatural horror/fantasy should give it a watch.

Have to say from the get go, because it is a Shudder movie, this is not a horror film. That being said, I embarrassingly can not put on my finger on what I would call it. It does have some jump scares though I would say they are not gratuitous, they just add to the tenor of the scene for the most part.

The idea of the film was original enough for me to be interested, but I still thought I could rightly predict how it's all going to go down. While I was right a few times, I was wrong enough so that I was really engaged throughout. That's good, because there a few (only a few) sequences where the less-attentive among us might reach for the phone.

It seems like it is partly a study of how fear rules our life, but it's not fussy or pretentious about it. No it doesn't, but that is a central tenet of the film. It's also about guilt, fear and, well, these parts of everyone's life.

It's just a very good story that was very well directed with some actors who I recognize but could not name delivering very good performances. It's funny, I watched Don't be Afraid of the Dark last night and Guy Pearce, who I personally rate as an actor, was outclassed by everyone compared to his performance in that movie.

I will say I wonder if having two directors kind of kept it from being more focussed on a particular genre. The locations they used were excellent and truly added to or complimented every part of the movie. I would like to see this premise explored in a few different ways, with each focussing on a specific genre, as I don't know of a great many movies very similar to it.

Bottom line is either make time for it or don't turn the channel if you find it coming on. You won't be dissapointed.