Animated Atrocities

This guy is my favorite reviewer on YouTube. This guy pretty much sums it up on how bad animation is on TV. I watch other Animated Atrocities, but I really like to watch the episode if it's about Nickelodeon. I also watch Admirable Animation, too. I like it, also. Of course there is some good animation out there. So if you ever want to see how bad most animation is now a days, watch this series on YouTube. Some of my favorite Atrocities is Love Loaf (Breadwinners), Fart Baby (Sanjay and Craig), A Pal for Gary (SpongeBob), Save the Tooth (Glenn Martin DDS), and so many more. This guy puts a lot of variety in his videos. One of my favorite people and reviewers on YouTube. So, I just want to say, Keep on keeping on, Mr. Enter! Keep up the good work!

This show definitely is not to my taste. The show features Mr. Enter commenting on several children's cartoons. Frankly this show is unpleasant, Mr.Enter does not review the shows fairly as he only ever talks about the negative aspects; granted the show is called Animated Atrocities but it is not fair reviewing to only talk about what it does wrong unless the show is an absolute abysmal, which 9 times out of 10 the show he is reviewing is not. Also Enter is really angry in this show. You have to have several emotions when making these kind of videos, just plain anger doesn't hold my attention nor does it create anything of substance, you can use happiness, anger, sadness, melancholy, excitement but just showing annoyance does not bring anything new or exciting to the table.

The show also lacks comedy, I'm assuming that he is doing this as a riff sort of thing, like what the Nostaglia Critic or Jontron do in their web-series. However many of the episodes do not have any jokes or anything of that sort, and an awful lot of the ones that do Enter has to really stretch to make a joke, or just settle for an easy target. Granted there are many times that Enter can make good jokes and he does seem to have a good sense comedic timing, however a lot of the comedy is not spectacular The editing is not exactly top notch either. There are many audio glitches and sometimes when he is talking he gets cut off mid sentence. And the footage is also looped very often, it gets very monotonous looking at the same clip over and over again. When he started this series Enter was an amateur so the poor editing is excusable, however he is using Patreon for this series now so I think that if he is making money from this then the editing has to be tuned up. Enter should invest in good editing software such as Sony Vegas Pro, or he could commission an editor Enter lacks variety in what he reviews. The majority of his reviews are targeted towards the Spongebob Squarepants show, it is very important to have diversity in what you are reviewing, if you review the same thing over and over again then there is nothing new or noteworthy.

I've notices that his biggest complaint amongst what he reviews is that it is violent or mean-spirited. There are many films, television programs, books and other media that are mean spirited but they are still good. I honestly do not see a problem with this material. I used to watch shows like this when I was a child and I'm not some kind of violent maniac. Children are not idiots, they understand that what happens on TV and in real life are two very different things so there is no risk of the average child pummelling their best friend with a hammer because a starfish told them to. Obviously there are some things such as a Clockwork Orange which shouldn't be shown to young children but cartoons are absolutely harmless. To be frank, saying that Spongebob is violent sounds like something an overprotective mum would say.

Mr. Enter clearly needs to work on some things on his show, as right now it is not very impressive

I'm gonna preface this by saying why there even is a page for Mr. Enter's "Animated Atrocities" to begin with here on IMDB. We all knew it was gonna be a trainwreck of negative reviews from his haters. He's become the internet's punching bag cause he criticizes kids cartoons, therefore he's seen as a big "man-baby".

But he's actually a really good reviewer. Do I agree with him ALL the time? Good God no, but he definitely makes some really good points. Like his reviewing style or not, you have to actually give him a chance. He's definitely harsh, and can get a bit angry, but he's greatly improved over the last few years. So I strongly recommend his more recent videos over his old ones.

Check out his videos and actually give them a chance instead of letting the bulk of the internet judge for you. The lot of you may still not like him, but you'll also learn a lot from his videos.

Call me an "Enterbot" all you want, but I just had to leave this here. He certainly ain't a bad person, and not as bad a reviewer as most have claimed. He's an internet critic, it's his job to criticize these shows. Give him a chance.

Quite frankly I'm surprised IMDb lists a YouTube series on here anyways, which is an odd thing to do but I'll accept it. But many of the reviews in this section have been nothing but rude insults thrown at a person. Mr Enter (as his YouTube channel is called) isn't a despicable person, nor is he deserving of half the crap thrown at him here by his haters. Does he get angry? Yes. Is it entirely justified? Mostly, yes. Everyone likes to pick apart his intentions like this person is some object they get to pull apart and decide if it's to their liking, and I find that nothing short of reprehensible and for every piece of actual criticism I've read about him, I've read ten pieces of judgmental and angry junk that is nothing more than the very thing these people seem to have against Mr Enter; rude, arrogant, and insulting. Only instead of a piece of art he found particularly repulsive (and make no mistake, he has reviewed some truly nauseating distasteful trash, and he does make sure to cite his problems with each clearly, using research to back up some of his more political points), these reviewers only seem to want to use these words to attack a person. And for every decent criticism, it's exaggerated by hyperbole like saying his voice is worse than nails on a chalk board (it's not that bad) and he takes cartoons too seriously for a 30 year old man (he sees animation as an art form and thinks it should be treated as such) or other such nonsense.

Next time you attempt to demean and berate a person, I suggest to try to see things from their point of view. Perhaps you might learn to see things differently or at the very least provide something useful, rather than become part of the problem by ranting and insulting someone's viewpoints and manner of expressing it.

I found his reviews flawed, rushed or sometimes insulting! The thing is that he let's his emotions and massive ego get the best of him. This is true in his "Pet Sitter " when he called out and offended one of the writers for not satisfying his ridiculously high standers. Not to mention the production quality is pretty low in his episodes. Also, he quite an egotistical person. His reviewers sometimes feel rush out and unthought out which is quite unprofessional I might add. For example on his " Brothers Grunt" he kept repeating the same two to three points over and over again throughout the entire video. Finally he takes things too seriously. For example, most of his MLP FiM reviews can have him swearing like a sailor and insulting the writers or just him screaming on top of this lungs.