In Dispute: Lively v Baldoni

This "documentary" if you can even call it that...more like mocumentary...is so incredibly biased! Another bought and paid for biased review just like the NYT article. You could tell the Buzzfeed editor, the guy from on The Ankler, Dina Doll and Emily Bergh are very biased or just terrified of kaleesi and her dragons.

I give this show 2 stars for having Perez Hilton and Kiersti Flaa. However, where is Candace Owens, Zack Peters or Stephanie Tleiji. They have all gone into minute details, sifted and read documents, spoken to multiple people who were on set and those who have worked with both Blake and Justin. They absolutely should have been interviewed if you really wanted to be truly unbiased!

I've never been a huge fan of Blake Lively but I have liked a few of the movies she's been in. I had never heard of Justin Baldoni before this movie. I know for a fact Coleen Hoover had a 'morals clause' in her contract with Justin that stated if Baldoni was found guilty she would get her movie rights back. This should be proof to everyone! She's been on camera ADMITTING she wishes she had the rights back bc she would love for Blake to have the movie rights NOT Justin. Further evidence for me personally.... I had been in a DV relationship before my husband and I have been harassed quite a few times in places I've worked (I waitressed and bartended thru college). He would NEVER and I mean NEVER joke about it! Ryan made jokes in his movie (Deadpool v Wolverine) and he made jokes during the SNL skit. I don't believe for a moment any loving husband would ever make light of or joke about their wife/mother of their children being harassed or abused if they honestly believed it happened and was traumatic. That should be a clear sign to everyone her claim is garbage!

Very very biased. Missing critical information. Clearly Lively's team has their hand in the pot with this one. It's quite pathetic. 0/10. Wouldn't recommend. It seems like her CIA public relations management has been working overtime with this one. Very very biased. Missing critical information. Clearly Lively's team has their hand in the pot with this one. It's quite pathetic. 0/10. Wouldn't recommend. It seems like her CIA public relations management has been working overtime with this one. Very very biased. Missing critical information. Clearly Lively's team has their hand in the pot with this one. It's quite pathetic. 0/10. Wouldn't recommend. It seems like her CIA public relations management has been working overtime with this one.

No facts and biased. I wouldn't be surprised if a 7 grader made this for a school project on her favorite female celebrity drama they've been apart of. This is what it feels like. Why would someone take time and money (based off what I watched I doubt any real money was put into this, unless it was bought by the star bully protagonist herself) to put this together? This in itself seems like a smear campaign and tactic to sway the public, unfortunately we can read, research, and have critical thinking skills. I wish the director actually took time to read the lawsuit on both ends before putting out such garbage.

This documentary significantly oversimplified a complex legal situation. It featured interviews with individuals who presented inaccurate information and constructed a flawed timeline of events. Crucially, the documentary omitted key parties and numerous lawsuits, while downplaying serious allegations. For instance, the extortion claim, a central element of the legal proceedings, was barely addressed and dismissed as an exaggeration.

The documentary relied heavily on the perspectives of three bloggers, a non-expert attorney, and an inexperienced freelancer. This approach lacked investigative journalism and demonstrated a failure to fact-check. The documentarians presented these viewpoints as definitive, without providing any balanced, or well researched information.

It is important to note that there are currently eight complaints filed by six distinct groups of individuals related to this case. The documentary only acknowledged three of these complaints, which shows a significant lack of depth.

Loved the movie, but everything about this senseless surrounding drama told me that watching the documentary would make me cringe at yet another set of overpaid, air-headed celebrities behaving badly. I should not have watched because it actually turned out to be worse than what I expected. All of the claims seem baseless and definitely mimic the behavior of schoolyard children hurling nonsensical taunts. This whole case is such a waste of precious court resources so two immature adults can try to one up each other.

I'm very disappointed in Lively because that's not the way to get creative control. Then to bring in Reynolds and Swift; talk about a mean girl gang (Ryan included).

This whole case is just one big BS non-debacle. And this is why I no longer pay to go to the movies.